GOOD.is
GOOD is a collaboration of individuals, businesses, and nonprofits pushing the world forward. Get involved.
  • Home
  • |
  • Columns ▶
    • BoingBoing on GOOD
    • Joe Ippolito on Business
    • Carol Coletta on Cities
    • Alissa Walker on Design
    • Ben Jervey on the Environment
    • Peter Smith on Food
    • Truman National Security Project on Foreign Policy
    • Picture Show
    • Mark Peters on Language
    • Anne Trubek on Literature
    • See All Columns
  • |
  • Video
  • |
  • Infographics
  • |
  • Community
  • |
  • Events
  • Follow GOOD:
  • twitter
  • flickr
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss feed
  • Business
  • |
  • Cities
  • |
  • Culture
  • |
  • Design
  • |
  • Education
  • |
  • Environment
  • |
  • Food
  • |
  • Health
  • |
  • Media
  • |
  • People
  • |
  • Politics
  • |
  • Technology
  • |
  • Transportation
  • 3
  • 11

Is Owning a Dog Worse than Owning an SUV?

  • Posted by: Zach Frechette
  • on November 3, 2009 at 10:06 am

27311601New Scientist took a look at the relative carbon impact of owning a dog (or cat, or hamster) and owning an SUV like a Toyota Land Cruiser. The results, plotted in the chart above, may surprise you. Take a look at the original article to see if you agree with the methodology, or if you can even put an environmental price on your furkid.

(Via @foodrumblings)

  • Filed under: Blog : GOOD Blog
  • Categories: Environment
  • Tags: carbon footprint , dogs , SUV
  • Share
  • Discuss
  • Mark it good!
  • Facebook
  •   Twitter
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
Direct link to this post:
Send as an Email:
Your email address:
Recipient's email address:
Message:

X
DISCUSSION: 11 Comments
    • Posted by: Patrick James
    • on November 3, 2009 at 10:13 am

    What if your dog only eats carbon?

    • Posted by: Atley Kasky
    • on November 3, 2009 at 10:36 am

    Cuddles combat global warmings!

    • Posted by: bang21
    • on November 3, 2009 at 11:22 am

    Pretty low mileage driven per year:10,000 km = 6,200+ milesStill interesting. You can have my wife’s dog.

    • Posted by: jpperry
    • on November 3, 2009 at 11:25 am

    What about kids?

    • Posted by: KPJ
    • on November 3, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    “But if you must own your own, think about getting an animal that serves
    a dual purpose. He recommends hens, which partly compensate for their
    eco-footprint by providing eggs. Or there is an even better
    alternative, if you can stomach it. ‘Rabbits are good,’ he says, ‘provided you eat them.’”Have we really gotten to the point where the companionship, health, happiness and good times provided by a pet are not legitimate purposes of human activity?

    • Posted by: JuliaOsovskaya
    • on November 4, 2009 at 12:11 am

    Wow, this is interesting

    • Posted by: albygip
    • on November 4, 2009 at 3:56 am

    yeah kill your dog and go to buy a SUV NOW!!!! you’ill be much more environmental friendly…1) 10,000km/year is really too low…2) they included the energy for the construction of the SUV but what about the dog?3) they didn’t consider the entire life cycle…what about the final disposal? I think a dog is much more biodegradable than a SUV!!i’ll keep my dog while i wait for futher investigations…

    • Posted by: Amras
    • on November 4, 2009 at 11:04 am

    As Fast Company said on their take on the results published by New Scientist, “Too bad the figures smell like bullshit.” Bang21 already hit the nail on the head, 6200 miles per year is barely half the actual average mileage in the United States. And the meat and grain that goes into dog food is mostly byproduct from meat processing for humans, so what’s the “fresh” bit in that 450 grams the Vales are using? I mean valiant effort and all to try to “live green,” but let’s put a bit more research and thought into things before publishing.

    • Posted by: Michael Hodgson
    • on November 6, 2009 at 8:53 am

    …but my cat also stop many birds and mice from making carbon emissions, so shouldn’t he be getting a carbon credit for that? If that were taken into account I am sure my cat is carbon neutral.

    • Posted by: amiricle
    • on November 8, 2009 at 9:43 am

    I’m mostly curious why someone would think up this question and spend time comparing the need of a living thing to a machine? But like the previous commenter mentioned, the meat that is the hugest chunk of this equation is mostly byproduct, not primarily grown just for dog food. Who funded this study?

    • Posted by: Phil K.
    • on November 13, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    Maybe a better question would be, “What’s worse? Being a smug wanker with nothing better to do than attempt to make people feel bad about their pets, or minding your own damn business?”

Login or Sign up to discuss this article

Related Content

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Carbon Industry Collapse?

    Last week Al Gore warned Wall Street movers and shakers to rethink their investments in carbon-intensive businesses. Carbon ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    New Doc Chronicles Threat to South Central L.A. Garden

    A tree may grow in Brooklyn, but there's a 14-acre farm in South Central Los Angeles. ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Nice Suit

    Ten states, led by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, have taken matters into their own hands and filed suit ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : The Community Board

    Lose the Cattle, Save the World

    Lose the Cattle, Save the World   We’ve all heard the meat is murder argument, and chances are if it hasn’t inspired ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : The Community Board

    EPA releases Bush-era endangerment finding « Legal Planet: Environmental Law and Policy

    Original article: EPA releases Bush-era endangerment finding « Legal Planet: Environmental Law and Policy
    Read & Discuss

Recent Readers

  • guynamedtopher
  • redwaterlily
  • Facebook User
  • rob273b
  • Will Etling
  • zachfrechette
  • Jay J. Ku
  • morganclendaniel
  • atleyzgoodmagazi
See all

This Week In Blogs

  • Most Discussed
  • Most GOODMarked
  1. How Thanksgiving Got Its Turkey
  2. Is Newsweek’s Sarah Palin Cover Sexist?
  3. The Culture of the Interrobang
  4. Transparency: The Effects of Bike Commuting on Obesity
  5. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  6. Sad or Cute: Hermit Crab Makes Home in Broken Bottle
  7. Are You Raising a Furkid?
  8. Rental Goats Clear Brush Better, Beat Cosmonauts in Space Race
  9. The Charter for Compassion
  10. How Many Books Do You Read Each Year?
  1. The Charter for Compassion
  2. New School: How the Web Liberalized Liberal Arts Education
  3. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  4. EyeWriter: Paralyzed Artist Draws with His Eyes
  5. The Culture of the Interrobang
  6. Intermission: Eye-popping 3D Building Projections
  7. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Fire this Time: Copenhagen and the War for the Future
  8. The Kids Are All Right
  9. Charging Forward with Mission Motor’s Electric Superbike
  10. Singularity 101: What Is the Singularity?

GOOD Magazine
About
|
Join
|
Sign In

Categories

  • Business
  • Cities
  • Culture
  • Design
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Media
  • People
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Transportation

Special Features

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Infographics
  • Look
  • Picture Show
  • Q&A
  • Video

Community

  • Community Board
  • Member directory
  • Join the Community

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Flickr

Magazine

  • Current issue
  • Back issues
  • Subscribe
  • Gift a gift
  • Renew/Service

GOOD

  • What is GOOD?
  • Make GOOD better
© GOOD Worldwide LLC. - all rights reserved
  • Company details
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • RSS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Powered by Verkata