When Mitt Romney wanted to find a way to help respond to Hurricane Sandy, his campaign decided that it would be a good idea to head to a “relief center” and package up a few cans of Campbell’s soup.

While there’s nothing wrong with Campbell’s, this isn’t the type of response that a crisis like Hurricane Sandy requires. Never mind that the Red Cross would prefer cash donations rather than canned goods (actually, do mind that, and then go donate here). The real problem is that along with his cans of soup, Governor Romney is also offering the American people something much more dangerous: an energy plan that would keep us burning more fossil fuels, leading to more climate change, and more extreme weather like Hurricane Sandy.

The science is increasingly clear: Climate change is causing more extreme weather. By heating up the average temperature of the planet, global warming puts more energy into storms. As a number of scientists have put it, pumping more carbon into the atmosphere is like putting the planet on steroids. Just like a juiced up hitter won’t always hit a homerun, not every storm will turn into a hurricane. But, the more pollution we put in, the more likely we’ll see a grand slam like Hurricane Sandy.

There are a number of other ways that climate change influences hurricanes in particular. Since warm air holds more water than cold, the atmosphere is about 4 percent wetter than it was in 1970, leading to heavier rain falls that make flooding more likely. Storm surges also now ride on sea levels that have risen over the last century due to global warming, amplifying flooding losses where the surge strikes. In the Northeast United States, sea levels are rising up to four times faster than the global average, making this area even more vulnerable to flooding.

And if you were thinking that it was a bit strange that a sub-tropical cyclone was able to get all the way up to Northeast in late October, there’s a climate connection there too. Right now, sea surface temperatures along the Northeast U.S. coast are about 5 degrees above average, which helps keep the storm powered up and load moisture into the system, fueling heavy rain. September had the second highest global ocean temperatures on record.

So, what are our politicians doing about the problem? While a discussion of global warming was mostly absent from the presidential election—the words “climate change” didn’t appear in a presidential debate for the first time since 1988—the topic of sea level rise did come up once. It was part of a laugh line at the Republican National Convention, when Romney criticized President Obama for promising to “slow the rise of the oceans and heal the planet.” As Bill Clinton put it in Minneapolis on Tuesday, “In my part of America, we would like it if someone could’ve done that yesterday.”

Perhaps it’s little surprise that climate change has all but disappeared from the public agenda. The fossil fuel industry has spent over $150 million this election cycle to keep up the climate silence. Just last week, Chevron made the largest single corporate political donation since the Citizens United decision, giving $2.5 million to a pro-GOP SuperPAC. Together with the hundreds of millions the industry spends on lobbying during the regular calendar year, this tidal wave of money has been enough to drown out any Congressional attempts at real climate action.

Which is why, when it comes to the question of how to respond to Hurricane Sandy once we’ve donated to immediate disaster relief, the answer is: find new ways to challenge the fossil fuel industry.

Unless we can begin to weaken the stranglehold that Big Oil, Coal, and Gas have over our economy and our democracy, we won’t be able to see the type of rapid fossil fuel phase-out necessary to prevent further climate catastrophe. Even the most conservative governments in the world have agreed that we must limit global warming to no more to 2 degrees and scientists have calculated that we can only burn 565 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide in order to stay below the target. But the fossil fuel industry has 2795 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide in their reserves, nearly five times too much—and everyday they’re spending millions of dollars looking for more.

The industry is going to fight tooth and nail to turn this carbon below ground into money above ground, so we need to find creative ways to fight back. This fall, 350.org is launching a fossil fuel divestment campaigns to go directly at the industry’s bottom line. The effort will start on college campuses, but quickly needs to spread to religious institutions, pension funds, and personal investments. We’re kicking off the effort with a big nationwide tour called Do The Math, which you can sign up for here.

Along with divestment, we need to go after the fossil fuel industry’s social license to operate. During the 1990s, health advocates successfully isolated the tobacco industry by combining grassroots campaigns, smart advertising, and political lobbying. Slowly but surely, smoking began to transform from something that made you cool to something that killed you. Remember when the Big Tobacco executives got dragged before Congress and lied about nicotine being addictive? Well, it’s time to drag some Big Oil CEOs onto the stand to see what they’ll say about climate change.

Finally, we need to find innovative ways to free our own communities from fossil fuels. This is where the GOOD community in particular can help take a lead. Together, we’re finding new ways to do everything from transforming urban agriculture into an art form to saving billions of dollars in health costs by promoting local biking. Exciting new efforts like Mosaic are offering people ways to put their money into reliable, local solar projects rather than ship it off to be gambled on Wall Street.

Coming together as a community not only helps address climate change, it helps prepare us for the impacts that we can’t avoid. My 350.org colleagues in Brooklyn, for example, have teamed up with a group of activists from Occupy Wall Street to use a new tool called Recovers.org to help coordinate bottom-up, grassroots disaster relief and community recovery.

Who knows, maybe they’ll even pull together some sort of canned goods drive and invite Governor Romney. In the meantime, it’s high-time for our politicians, and all of us, to connect the dots between extreme weather events like Hurricane sandy, climate change, and the root of the problem: the fossil fuel industry.


Jamie Henn is a co-founder and communications director for the international climate campaign 350.org.

  • Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away
    Dogs have impressive observational powers.Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.

    “A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”

    His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.

    pregnancy signs, dogs and pregnancy, pitbull behavior, pet intuition, dog overprotection, Reddit stories, viral Reddit, dog instincts, canine emotions, dog owner tips
    Otis knew before they did. Canva

    Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.

    So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”

    The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.

    Any chance your wife is pregnant?

    ZZBC | Reddit

    The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!

    “The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”

    Redditors responded with similar experiences.

    Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.

    realityisworse | Reddit

    So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?

    Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”

    The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.

  • ,

    Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

    Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

    While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

    When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

    Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.


Explore More Articles Stories

Articles

Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Articles

11 hilarious posts describe the everyday struggles of being a woman