Hey, science nerds. Here’s a fascinating piece by Olivia Judson, an evolutionary biologist who is exceptionally good at making science interesting to those who don’t necessarily know their way around science-journal lingo. The piece is about forest fires. Actually it’s about different plant species and whether or not they are evolving to actually encourage these fires in a sort of plant version of survival of the fittest.It’s a great read, and since it’s that time of year when forest fires start to take over the news, it adds an extra element of interest to the perennial news story. Do these trees want to be torched?Writes Judson: “Many plants that live in places prone to fire are highly flammable – more flammable than plants that live elsewhere. This has led some to speculate that these plants have actually evolved to cause fires: that they “want” fire, and have evolved features that make it more likely that a spark will become a flame, and a flame will become a fire. I call this the torch-me hypothesis.”
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

