Gen Z is on a constant search for unique experiences. Surprisingly, that search has led them straight to the past.

Farley Ledgerwood, a writer for Global English Editing who identifies as a boomer, recently highlighted a fascinating trend. The hobbies he grew up with (like activities that were once considered “old fashioned”), are suddenly the coolest things you can do on a Saturday night.

In an era of digital overload, young people are craving tactile, real world experiences. Here are 10 “boomer” hobbies that have found a new life with a younger generation.

Gen Z hobbies, boomer trends, analog hobbies, slow living, vinyl records resurgence, urban homesteading, birdwatching trends, mental health hobbies
A group of Gen Z friends pose for a photo Canva

1. Vinyl records

The sales of vinyl records are once again on the rise. So much so, that top pop stars put out vinyl versions of their latest albums. According to The Foothill Dragon Press, over 50 percent of physical album sales are attributed to vinyl. Mega music stars like Taylor Swift and Harry Styles all release multiple versions of their music on these analog discs. Teens and young adults love the sound. And why wouldn’t they? Throwing a record on the turntable was ‘vibey’ before and absolutely ‘slaps’ today.

2. Gardening

Gardening was a necessity at one time. People literally grew their own food. Today it can be challenging to keep a succulent alive more than a year or two. However, younger people are unearthing a passion for “urban homesteading.”

Homesteaders try to live self-sufficiently by growing their own food and maybe even raising some too. Business Insider reported Gen Z have embraced the concept and are excited to build something with their own two hands.

3. Handwritten journaling

There is an interesting power in the written word. Writing about what’s happening in our lives helps calm our minds and still emotions. Farley, the boomer, said he journaled about, “teenage worries, young love, and big dreams.”

An article in The Post written by Abby Jenkins described that young people are drawn to journaling from digital overload. She believed it helped to have a grounding hobby amidst the chaos of daily life.

@blisshaze

Can you guess who I wrote to? ? I literally just sat down to film me writing something and then I got the idea to write to a character of the book I was reading just then. Loved that! ✍? Who would you want to write to right now? ? Journaling, writing, handwriting, cursive writing #journal #journaling #journalinspiration #writing #handwriting ♬ original sound – Elena ?

4. Knitting

I’ve come across some people knitting in public situations both young men and women. They’ve spoken of it’s calming nature and that it helps them settle during bouts of anxiety. I had no idea boomers did it when they were young. Seems pretty cool, people are back at it again. Maybe it’s time to invest in yarn.

5. Fishing

The Times wrote about an increase in young people filing for fishing licenses. Teens claimed the sport of fishing was great for navigating the effects brought on by anxiety. Farley framed the experience in a fantastic way saying, “Watching a bobber dance on the surface still beats doomscrolling any day.”


Gen Z hobbies, boomer trends, analog hobbies, slow living, vinyl records resurgence, urban homesteading, birdwatching trends, mental health hobbies
Gif of man tying to reel in something from a boat viau00a0Giphy

6. Baking from scratch

This is not pulling open a packet and throwing in eggs and some water. This is taking the core individual ingredients and crafting something unique. These original creations are often found from something called, a recipe.

Back during the Covid pandemic, baking was one of the things people embraced to navigate a challenging time. The Atlantic wrote about teens having their lives disrupted with no access to team sports, school, and time with friends. Many spent these lonely days watching the unique fads exploding across YouTube and TikTok. Ever since, Gen Z has been baking breads and crafting meals from scratch in the kitchen.

7. Letter writing

There is something awfully nice about a personally written letter. Not texting or a quick email, but pen to paper to say ‘hello.’ Teens are taking to calligraphy workshops, pen pal clubs, and sending snail mail (mailing through the post office.) Newsweek wrote about teens appreciating the personal touch most. They also felt like they could avoid being monetized, and love that the experience feels more private.

8. Woodworking

Some people are just pretty handy with some wood and a saw. Crafting furniture pieces, making cutting boards, building shelves are all time consuming, yet relaxing endeavors for the budding carpenter. Architectural Digest found young people craved the experience. Even though it can be a costly hobby, the challenges are all part of the fun.

9. Puzzles and board games

There’s nothing quite like the fun found in sitting around a table battling over a game of Monopoly or hunting down that weird angular piece for a puzzle. An article in Pittwire, the newspaper for the University of Pittsburgh, found that the popularity in board games had skyrocketed amongst college students. So much that the trend rivaled the rise of social media and smart phones.

10. Bird-watching

It’s nice to get outside. A lovely day with a nice walk and a pair of binoculars or a smartphone can lead to some wonderful discoveries. Nature is out there, if you’re willing to go look for it. The Guardian wrote about social-media platforms have communities for young “birders” to post images and videos of their sightings. Young people are organizing outings for hikes, getting to enjoy some beautiful days, and see some colorful birds.

Gen Z hobbies, boomer trends, analog hobbies, slow living, vinyl records resurgence, urban homesteading, birdwatching trends, mental health hobbies
Gif of a bird birdwatching viau00a0Giphy


Some thoughts about it

These 10 hobbies are great for younger people to get off their tech screens and experience some tactile interaction. All of these things can be done alone, but also with another person or group. It’s concerning how isolated and alone young people often find themselves these days. A culture of self reliance and few opportunities to socially engage in an open setting is troublesome. A lot of the reasons young people gave for trying out these boomer hobbies was the desire to cope with growing anxiety.

The New York Post wrote that Generation Z has the lowest levels of social fitness. Growing up on the internet with less human interactions has led to greater feelings of loneliness and isolation. Hopefully getting into these timeless, cool hobbies, Gen Z can learn stronger social skills and gain the benefits of that human, communal touch.

This article originally appeared last year.

  • Despite all the likes, literallys and dropped g’s, English isn’t decaying before our eyes
    Photo credit: LisaStrachan/iStock via Getty Images Fear not: There isn’t anything that needs saving.

    As a linguistics professor, I’m often asked why English is decaying before our eyes, whether it’s “like” being used promiscuouslyt’s being dropped deleteriously or “literally” being deployed nonliterally.

    While these common gripes point to eccentric speech patterns, they don’t point to grammatical annihilation. English has weathered far worse.

    Let’s start with something we can all agree on: Old English, spoken from approximately A.D. 450 to 1100, is pretty unintelligible to us today. Anyone who’s had the pleasure of reading “Beowulf” in high school knows how different English back then used to sound. Word endings did a lot more grammatical work, and verbs followed more complicated patterns. Remnants of those rules fuel lingering debates today, such as when to use “whom” over “who,” and whether the past tense of “sneak” is “snuck” or “sneaked.”

    The language went on to experience centuries of tumult: Viking invasions, which introduced Old Norse influence; Anglo-Norman French rule, which shifted the language of the elite to French; and 18th-Century grammarians, who dictated norms with their elocution and grammar guides.

    In that time, English has lost almost all of the more complex linguistic trappings it was born with to become the language we know and – at least, sometimes – love today. And as I explain in my new book, “Why We Talk Funny: The Real Story Behind Our Accents,” it was all thanks to the way that language naturally evolves to meet the social needs of its speakers.

    From dropping the ‘l’ to dropping the ‘g’

    The things we tend to label as “bad” or sloppy English – for instance, the “g” that gets lost from our -ing endings or the deletion of a “t” when we say a word like “innernet” – actually reflect speech habits that are centuries old.

    Take, for example, “often.” Originally spoken with the “t,” that pronunciation gradually became less favored around the 15th century, alongside that “l” in “talk” and the “k” in know. Meanwhile, the “s” now stuck on the back of verbs like “does” and “makes” began as a dialectal variant that only became popular in 16th-century London. It gradually replaced “th” whenever third persons were involved, as in “The lady doth protest too much.”

    While dropping the “l” in talk may have been initially frowned upon, today it would be strange if you pronounced the letter. And the shift makes sense: It smoothed out some linguistic awkwardness for the sake of efficiency.

    If people learned to look at language more like linguists, they might come around to seeing that there is more than one perspective on what good speech consists of.

    And yes, that absolutely is a sentence ending with a preposition – something many modern grammar guides discourage, even though the idea only took hold after 18th-century grammarian Robert Lowth intimated it was a less elegant choice based on the model of Latin.

    Though Lowth voiced no hard and fast rule against it, many a grammar maven later misconstrued his advice as an admonition. Just like that, a mere suggestion became grammatical law.

    The rise of the grammar sticklers

    Many of today’s ideas about what constitutes correct English are based on a singular – often mistaken – 19th-century view of the forces that govern our language.

    In the late 18th century, the English-speaking world began experiencing class restructuring and higher literacy rates. As greater class mobility became possible, accent differences became class markers that separated new money from old money.

    Emulation of upper-crust speech norms became popular among the nouveau riche. With literacy also on the rise, grammarians and elocutionists raced to dictate the terms of “proper” English on and off the page, which led to the rise of usage guides and dictionaries that were eager to sell a certain brand of speech.

    Another example of grammarian angst reconfiguring the view of an otherwise perfectly fine form is the droppin’ of the “g.” It became so tied to slovenly speech that it was branded with an apostrophe in the 19th century to make sure no one missed its lackadaisical and nonstandard nature.

    Up until the 19th century, however, no one seemed to care whether one pronounced it as “-in” or “-ing.”

    Evidence suggests that -ing wasn’t even heard as the correct form. Many elocution guides from the 18th century provide rhyming word pairs like “herring/heron,” “coughing/coffin” and “jerking/jerkin,” which suggest that “-in” may have been the preferred pronunciation of words ending with “-ing.” Even writer and satirist Jonathan Swift – a frequent lobbyist for “proper” English – rhymes “brewing” with “ruin” in his 1731 poem “Verses on the Death of Dr. Swift, D.S.P.D..”

    Embrace the change

    Language has always shifted and evolved. People often bristle at changes from what they’ve known to what is new. And maybe that’s because this process often begins with speakers that society usually looks less favorably on: the young, the female, the poor, the nonwhite.

    But it’s important to remember that being disliked and bad are not the same thing – that today’s speech pariahs are driven by the same linguistic and social needs as the Londoners who started going with “does” instead of “doth” or dropped the “t” in often.

    So if you think the speech that comes from your lips is the “correct” version, think again. Thou, like every other English speaker, art literally the product of centuries of linguistic reinvention.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.

  • 10 boys and 10 girls were left alone in separate houses and the different results are just wild
    Photo credit: Canva(L) Kids wrestling in the yard; (R) young children playing chess

    It sounds like the plot of William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. However, in the mid-2000s, it was a very real and very controversial reality television experiment.

    Footage from the UK Channel 4 documentary Boys and Girls Alone is captivating audiences all over again. It offers a fascinating and chaotic look at what happens when you remove parents from the equation.

    The premise was simple but high stakes. Twenty children, aged 11 and 12, were split into two groups by gender. Ten boys and ten girls were placed in separate houses and told to live without adult supervision for five days.

    The Setup

    While there were safety nets in place, the day-to-day living was entirely up to the kids. A camera crew was present but instructed not to intervene unless safety was at risk. The children could also ring a bell to speak to a nurse or psychiatrist.

    The houses were fully stocked with food, cleaning supplies, toys, and paints. Everything they needed to survive was there. They just had to figure out how to use it.

    The Boys: Instant Chaos

    In the boys’ house, the unraveling was almost immediate. The newfound freedom triggered a rapid descent into high-energy anarchy.

    They engaged in water pistol fights and threw cushions. In one memorable instance, a boy named Michael covered the carpet in sticky popcorn kernels just because he could.

    The destruction eventually escalated to the walls. The boys covered the house in writing, drawing, and paint. But the euphoria of freedom eventually crashed into the reality of consequences.

    “We never expected to be like this, but I’m really upset that we trashed it so badly,” one boy admitted in the footage. “We were trying to explore everything at once and got too carried away in ourselves.”

    Their attempts to clean up were frantic and largely ineffective. Nutrition also took a hit. Despite having completed a cooking course, the boys survived mostly on cereal, sugar, and the occasional frozen pizza. By the end of the week, the house was trashed, and the group had fractured into opposing factions.

    The Girls: Organized Society

    The girls’ house looked like a different planet.

    In stark contrast to the mayhem next door, the girls immediately established a functioning society. They organized a cooking roster, with a girl named Sherry preparing their first meal. They baked cakes. They put on a fashion show. They even drew up a scrupulous chores list to ensure the house stayed livable.

    While their stay wasn’t devoid of interpersonal drama, the experiment highlighted a fascinating divergence in socialization. Left to their own devices, the girls prioritized community and maintenance. The boys tested the absolute limits of their environment until it broke.

    The documentary was controversial when it aired, with critics questioning the ethics of placing children in unsupervised situations for entertainment. But what made it so enduring, and why footage keeps resurfacing years later, is what it reveals about how kids are socialized long before anyone puts them in a house together. The boys weren’t born anarchists and the girls weren’t born organizers. They arrived at those houses already shaped by years of being told, implicitly and explicitly, what boys do and what girls do. Whether that’s a nature story or a nurture story is the question the documentary keeps asking without quite answering, which is probably why people are still watching and arguing about it nearly two decades later.

    This article originally appeared two years ago. It has been updated.

  • 9-year-old girl asks Steph Curry why his shoes aren’t in girls’ sizes. The response was perfect.
    Photo credit: Wikicommons(L) A young girl's letter to Steph Curry asking about women's shoe sizes; (R) Steph Curry.
    ,

    9-year-old girl asks Steph Curry why his shoes aren’t in girls’ sizes. The response was perfect.

    “… it seems unfair that the shoes are only in the boys,” Riley Morrison wrote, starting a chain reaction of positive change.

    Nine-year-old Riley Morrison from Napa, California is a huge basketball fan. She roots for the Golden State Warriors and her favorite player is four-time NBA champion Steph Curry. Morrison loves to play basketball so she went online to pick up a pair of Curry’s Under Armour Curry 5 shoes, but there weren’t any available in the girls’ section of the site.

    But instead of resigning herself to the fact she wouldn’t be able to drive the lane in a sweet pair of Curry 5’s, she wrote a letter to the man himself. Her father posted it on social media:

    “My name is Riley (just like your daughter), I’m 9 years old from Napa, California. I am a big fan of yours. I enjoy going to Warriors games with my dad. I asked my dad to buy me the new Curry 5’s because I’m starting a new basketball season. My dad and I visited the Under Armour website and were disappointed to see that there were no Curry 5’s for sale under the girls section. However, they did have them for sale under the boy’s section, even to customize. I know you support girl athletes because you have two daughters and you host an all girls basketball camp. I hope you can work with Under Armour to change this because girls want to rock the Curry 5’s too.”

    “I wanted to write the letter because it seems unfair that the shoes are only in the boys’ section and not in the girls’ section,” Riley told Teen Vogue. “I wanted to help make things equal for all girls, because girls play basketball, too.”

    The letter got to Curry and he gave an amazing response on X (formerly Twitter).

    Many might be surprised that a megastar like Curry took a nine-year-old’s letter seriously, but he’s long been a vocal supporter of women’s issues.

    That August, Curry wrote an empowering letter that was published in The Player’s Tribune where he discussed closing the gender pay gap, hosting his first all-girls basketball camp, and what he’s learned from raising two daughters.

    In the essay he shared a powerful lesson his mother taught him. “Always stay listening to women to always stay believing in women, and — when it comes to anyone’s expectations for women — to always stay challenging the idea of what’s right,” he wrote.

    Curry clearly practices what he preaches because when a nine-year-old girl spoke up, he was all ears.

    Steph Curry and Under Armour didn’t just fix the girls’ sizing issue, they launched a special edition Curry 6 “United We Win” co-designed by Riley, created a $30K annual scholarship for girls, and shifted to unisex sizing across Curry Brand shoes.

    Since then, Curry has stayed active in promoting gender equity: he’s hosted girls’ camps, added girls to his elite training programs, mentored players like Azzi Fudd, and launched the Curry Family Women’s Athletics Initiative to fund 200+ scholarships at Davidson College.

    Riley and Steph bumped into each other at an event where they caught up and took photos. She is now a high school athlete at Vintage High School in Napa, still playing basketball. And yes, still rocking Currys.

    This article originally appeared seven years ago. It has been updated.

Explore More Culture Stories

Culture

Despite all the likes, literallys and dropped g’s, English isn’t decaying before our eyes

Culture

10 boys and 10 girls were left alone in separate houses and the different results are just wild

Media

9-year-old girl asks Steph Curry why his shoes aren’t in girls’ sizes. The response was perfect.

Art

Why Michelangelo’s ‘Last Judgment’ endures