GOOD

Attorney General William Barr is bringing back the federal death penalty after nearly 20 years

There is nothing less ‘conservative’ than a government executing its own citizens.

For the first time in nearly two decades, the federal government is reviving the death penalty. Attorney General Bob Barr has asked the government to bring back the policy and directed the Bureau of Prisons to schedule executions for five inmates currently on death row.

The change is another stark contrast in American policy that runs counter to virtually the rest of the entire world. For some perspective, America’s zeal for capital punishment puts us in competition with Saudi Arabia and North Korea, two of the least democratic nations on the planet.


It’s been 16 years since the United States federal government last put one of its own citizens to death. And the fact that the policy reversal comes from a self-described conservative, Christian administration highlights an incredible chasm between the values of limited government and faith.

What, exactly, is conservative about using the power of government to kill its own citizens? There is literally no greater exercise of federal power than saying a bureaucracy should be given the right to decide if one of its own free citizens lives or dies by the authority of the state.

What exactly is the correlation between those who say their religion dictates that abortion is murder while simultaneously advocating for the government to kill people convicted of crimes?

In a statement, Barr defended the move by pointing to past precedent:

“Congress has expressly authorized the death penalty through legislation adopted by the people’s representatives in both houses of Congress and signed by the President,” Attorney General Barr said. “Under Administrations of both parties, the Department of Justice has sought the death penalty against the worst criminals, including these five murderers, each of whom was convicted by a jury of his peers after a full and fair proceeding. The Justice Department upholds the rule of law—and we owe it to the victims and their families to carry forward the sentence imposed by our justice system.”

And that’s both technically true and wildly out of step with our evolving attitudes toward the death penalty.

Public support for the death penalty has been steadily declining over the past 25 years and is at near historic lows. A 2018 poll found that 54 percent of Americans still support the death penalty but those numbers are a sharp decline from just over 20 years ago when 76 percent of Americans supported capital punishment.

The death penalty is now banned in 21 states. In fact, conservatives have been leading the charge against capital punishment in recent years. Organizations like Conservatives Concerns About the Death Penalty have helped lead the march to reverse capital punishment laws in a number of states across the U.S.

In an op-ed opposing the move, Hannah Cox explains that while many believe the death penalty is reserved for the worst offenders, the opposite is often the case:

The federal death penalty system encompasses all of the problems we find at the state level. Though many think the federal system is reserved for the “worst of the worst” crimes like treason, espionage, or terrorism, the reality is only one person on the federal death row is there for one of those crimes.

Democrats came out in force opposed to the decision, including Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) and Elizabeth Warren (D-CA):

The five executions are scheduled to take place next year and the Justice Department said further executions are likely to be scheduled in the near future. Several groups and legal representatives for the targeted death row inmates said they will challenge the decision.

In the meantime, it’s likely to become a topic of discussion at the next Democratic presidential debate. But there’s little debate amongst Democrats when it comes to opposing capital punishment except in the most extreme cases.

But for Republicans, especially those who consider themselves limited-government advocates and social conservatives, this is a gut check moment: Will you stand up for those beliefs or put party over country? There’s nothing conservative about the death penalty and anyone who cares about liberty and justice should do their part to send the barbaric practices back to the history books.

Articles
Julian Meehan

Young leaders from around the world are gathering at the United Nations Headquarters in New York Saturday to address arguably the most urgent issue of our time. The Youth Climate Summit comes on the heels of an international strike spearheaded by Greta Thunberg, the 16-year-old climate activist from Sweden, who arrived in New York via emissions-free sailboat earlier this month.

Translated from Swedish, "berg" means "mountain," so it may feel fated that a young woman with Viking blood in her veins and summit in her name would be at the helm. But let's go out on a limb and presume Thunberg, in keeping with most activists, would chafe at the notion of pre-ordained "destiny," and rightly so. Destiny is passive — it happens to you. It's also egomaniacal. Change, on the other hand, is active; you have to fight. And it is humble. "We need to get angry and understand what is at stake," Thunberg declared. "And then we need to transform that anger into action."

This new generation of activists' most pernicious enemy is denial. The people in charge — complacent politicians and corporation heads who grossly benefit from maintaining the status quo — are buffered from real-life consequences of climate change. But millions of people don't share that privilege. For them, climate change isn't an abstract concept, but a daily state of emergency, whether it comes in the form of "prolonged drought in sub-Saharan Africa…devastating tropical storms sweeping across Southeast Asia, the Caribbean and the Pacific…[or] heatwaves and wildfires," as Amnesty International reportsare all too real problems people are facing on a regular basis.

RELATED: Greta Thunberg urges people to turn to nature to combat climate change

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

Millions of people in over 150 countries across the globe marched for lawmakers and corporations to take action to help stop climate change on Friday, September 20.

The Climate Strikes were organized by children around the world as an extension of the of the "Fridays for Future" campaign. Students have been walking out of classrooms on Fridays to speak out about political inaction surrounding the climate crisis.

"We need to act right now to stop burning fossil fuels and ensure a rapid energy revolution with equity, reparations and climate justice at its heart," organizers say.

There's no doubt the visual images from the marches send a powerful message to those on the ground but especially those watching from around the world. GOOD's own Gabriel Reilich was on the scene for the largest of the Climate Strikes. Here are 18 of the best signs from the Climate Strike march in New York City.

Keep Reading Show less

September 20th marks the beginning of a pivotal push for the future of our planet. The Global Climate Strike will set the stage for the United Nations Climate Action Summit, where more than 60 nations are expected to build upon their commitment to 2015's Paris Agreement for combating climate change.

Millions of people are expected to take part in an estimated 4,000 events across 130 countries.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Apple

When the iPhone 11 debuted on September 10, it was met with less enthusiasm than the usual iPhone release. A lot of techies are holding off purchasing the latest gadget until Apple releases a phone with 5G technology.

Major US phone carriers have yet to build out the infrastructure necessary to provide a consistent 5G experience, so Apple didn't feel it necessary to integrate the technology into its latest iPhone.

A dramatic new feature on the iPhone 11 Pro is its three camera lenses. The three lenses give users the the original wide, plus ultrawide and telephoto options.

Keep Reading Show less
Health
via I love butter / Flickr

We often dismiss our dreams as nonsensical dispatches from the mind while we're deep asleep. But recent research proves that our dreams can definitely affect our waking lives.

People often dream about their significant others and studies show it actually affects how we behave towads them the next day.

"A lot of people don't pay attention to their dreams and are unaware of the impact they have on their state of mind," said Dylan Selterman, psychology lecturer at the University of Maryland, says according to The Huffington Post. "Now we have evidence that there is this association."

Keep Reading Show less
Health