What Now?

We got sucker-punched by this election—we have to get back up

The Titanic. That’s how a colleague described the election tonight. Hillary Clinton, we believed, was an unsinkable campaign. Perfect? No. But undeniably ready, steadfast and ambitious. What we didn’t realize from where we stood: there were a whole bunch of people in the engine room, rooting for the iceberg.

So, we’ve hit the ice. The nightmare has come true. And, like any once-in-a-century, slow motion catastrophe, we have time—a punishing amount of time—to weigh our collective options.

My first instinct, like many of us who didn’t see this coming, is to jump. All those jokes about fleeing to Canada—suddenly, a very real scramble for that absurd lifejacket. So much so, it appears we crashed the Canadian immigration website. Because we thought we understood the country we were living in. We believed it was a country that was increasingly defined by a commitment to social progress and shared prosperity. We believed that because of the undeniable progress we have witnessed in the past eight years. We thought we were the winning majority.

We were wrong.

This election has laid bare how broken our country really is. Nearly half of the Americans who voted have backed a man who has repeatedly and shamelessly denigrated women, demonized immigrants and minorities, rejected science, and urged us to turn our backs on the rest of the world. We put the smart, qualified woman up against the ignorant, unqualified man. The man won.

So why didn't we see the iceberg? Maybe we’ve been seeing only the best of ourselves — emphasizing the positives in an effort to wither away the negatives. We’ve been in a warm bath of optimism. This election is cold reality. We now have two choices: give up and flee, or get angry and fight.

Ten years ago, at the height of the Bush era, we embarked on this mission with a single rallying call: America - Love It or Fix It. We committed ourselves to the Fix, and launched GOOD in order to celebrate and elevate an emerging movement of people who shared that commitment. We will dedicate ourselves once again to that mission, but with a fire and focus like never before. Because we aren’t going down with this ship.

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading