GOOD

If the Budget's So Bad, Why Doesn't California Repeal the Death Penalty?

Other states are talking about repealing the death penalty to save money. If California followed suit, it would save the state $125.5 million.


California's new (and former) governor, Jerry Brown, has announced broad and brutal budget cuts in an attempt to dig the state out of a $28 billion shortfall for this fiscal year. The University of California and California State University systems are losing $500 million each. Services for the developmentally disabled are being cut by $750 million. Welfare is being cut by $1.5 billion. It's rough.

To deal with its own fiscal problems, the Illinois House of Representatives just voted to ban the death penalty in the state. Seven other states are considering doing the same.


So how much would California save if it followed suit? A 2008 report (PDF) showed that "the $137 million annual cost of maintaining the criminal justice system would drop to just $11.5 million annually if the death sentence were abolished." The death penalty, with its expensive death row accommodations and lengthy legal proceedings, costs an astounding $125.5 million dollars each year. If it were made more error-proof it would cost even more.

Jerry Brown has a long and fraught history with the capital punishment in California. He tried to abolish it once and was overruled by the voters, as you can see in this news clip from 1977.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpKSifhiN3k

But doesn't it seem obvious that the world would be a better place if California stopped spending that $125.5 million trying to kill criminals that could simply be given life without parole and spent it on public education instead?

Articles
via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading
Culture

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading