5 Shocking Ways Listicles Are Destroying Civilization

Fighting clickbait with clickbait.

Listicles are big business in the land of web content. In 2014, lists proved to be the No. 1 most-shared article type, each one socially shared at an average rate of 21,000 times per month. (Even GOOD is not immune to the listicle’s charms.) Though lists have been around for a long time (pop quiz: how many commandments were there?), they’re becoming one of the major ways we consume journalism, even about serious topics (see “9 Questions About Syria You Were Too Embarrassed to Ask”). And, for good or ill, their lack of nuance might just be limiting our comprehension.

Below, an entirely unironic list of five reasons why that’s the case.

1. They Let Our Brains Off the Hook

It’s not hard to see why our brains are drawn to “snackable”—or easily digestible—content like lists. Because they’re numbered, we know upfront approximately how much time and energy we’re about to expend on a listicle. As The New Yorker puts it, before we’ve even begun reading, “the mental heavy lifting of conceptualization, categorization, and analysis is completed[...] a bit like sipping green juice instead of munching on a bundle of kale.” When encountering longer and more challenging information, our brains will immediately begin to sort that information spatially—and along the way, process and store it. Lists have already done that hard work for us, letting our brains off the hook.

2. They Cater to Our Distraction

Internet users only read about 28 percent of the words on a standard webpage. Some studies also suggest that our average attention span is only about 2.8 seconds. The National Center for Biotechnology Information is a bit more generous, estimating in 2013 that we’ve got about eight seconds before we’re on to the next thing (that’s one second less than a goldfish, by the way, and down from 12 seconds in 2000). Listicles anticipate our tendency toward distraction, grouping ever-smaller bits of information into sections, so just when we’re about to lose focus and go on to something else—perhaps “4 Quicks Ways to Help You Stay Focused”—we’ve got a new bite-sized chunk of text to snack on. In recent years, neuroscientists have revealed that the connections in our brains are far from fixed, with a plasticity to them that allows them to change neuronally in response to our habits. So the more we get accustomed to scanning and skimming, even within one piece of content, the more we crave (and click on) novel stimuli that we’ll never entirely absorb.

3. They Prevent Us From Making Our Own Mental Pictures

Listicles, particularly those created on the Buzzfeed model, are notorious for containing more animated GIFs than they do text. Though images have been a staple of journalism for hundreds of years, it’s a relatively new phenomenon for content to essentially “speak” in pictures. This isn’t a problem in and of itself, but research on reading comprehension has long demonstrated that the more a brain is able to create its own imagery in response to any concept it’s ingesting, the better it’s able to truly retain that information. As text shrinks and we encounter cute cat GIFs more frequently, our minds are shifting to expect and demand that imagery already be provided for us.

Here’s a picture, since your brain expects one.

4. They Prioritize Surface Over Substance

Material presented in a list can potentially facilitate quick recall, but does little to contribute to more indelible recognition. This is something that Meagan Norlin, the Twin Cities-based regional director of learning centers for Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes, says contributes to an overall failure of information comprehension. In her experience, even quick recall doesn’t always happen. She says she’s given her clients very short content—we’ll go ahead and call it “snackable”—to help them develop their reading skills. When asked what the content was about, even immediately afterward, “the client says they don’t remember,” as if the information went “in one ear and out the other.” The reading that occurs is for the sake of completing an activity, without retaining anything.

It may be great fun to read “8 Completely True Facts about Hippos,” but that quick-hitting list doesn’t provide enough background information for you to really understand and recall hippo facts. It’s not unlike cramming rather than studying over the long-term—you get the surface facts, but at the cost of more permanent, in-depth knowledge.

5. They Toy with Our Emotions

In 2006—long before the word “listicle” was in the Oxford English Dictionary—two sociologists, Matt Salganik and Duncan Watts, conducted a music-based experiment featuring a list of 48 top-ranking songs. They showed two groups of people the same list, reversing the order of songs for one group. So No. 1 became No. 48, No. 2 became No. 47, and so on. Afterwards, participants were asked to download their favorite songs included in the rankings. Findings showed that the best-ranked song was routinely the one downloaded, regardless of whether it was actually No. 1, or if it was merely No. 48 masquerading as the top song.

Though you might not rush out to buy the No. 1 puppy in “7 Dog Breeds That Like Humans Better Than Dogs,” that listicle will likely prevent you from recalling other information about the breed that’s buried in your mind. Your feelings about the breed might even start to change. And that’s to say nothing of more sensationalized headlines—otherwise known as clickbait—that listicles in more unsavory realms of the internet tend to employ. Yellow journalism isn’t exactly the newest kid on the block, but emerging neuroscience about clickbait suggests that the more persuasive a piece of content is, especially if it’s attempting to persuade you to be happy or angry about something, the more likely it is to go viral.

You may think your critical thinking skills enable you to rise above such manipulative tricks. Since you’ve stuck around long enough to reach the end of this listicle, you’ve got a chance. But as content strategists get savvier and your brain becomes more resistant to deep comprehension, that might not always be the case.

Screenshot via (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less

The disappearance of 40-year-old mortgage broker William Earl Moldt remained a mystery for 22 years because the technology used to find him hadn't been developed yet.

Moldt was reported missing on November 8, 1997. He had left a nightclub around 11 p.m. where he had been drinking. He wasn't known as a heavy drinker and witnesses at the bar said he didn't seem intoxicated when he left.

Keep Reading Show less
via Real Time with Bill Maher / YouTube and The Late Late Show with James Corden / YouTube

A controversial editorial on America's obesity epidemic and healthcare by comedian Bill Maher on his HBO show "Real Time" inspired a thoughtful, and funny, response by James Cordon. It also made for a great debate about healthcare that Americans are avoiding.

At the end of the September 6th episode of "Real Time, " Maher turned to the camera for his usual editorial and discussed how obesity is a huge part of the healthcare debate that no one is having.

"At Next Thursday's debate, one of the candidates has to say, 'The problem with our healthcare system is Americans eat shit and too much of it.' All the candidates will mention their health plans but no one will bring up the key factor: the citizens don't lift a finger to help," Maher said sternly.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore

The common stereotypes about liberals and conservatives are that liberals are bleeding hearts and conservatives are cold-hearted.

It makes sense, conservatives want limited government and to cut social programs that help the more vulnerable members of society. Whereas liberals don't mind paying a few more dollars in taxes to help the unfortunate.

A recent study out of Belgium scientifically supports the notion that people who scored lower on emotional ability tests tend to have right-wing and racist views.

Keep Reading Show less