When a start-up company enters a saturated market, odds are usually against it. But Chris Van Dyke, the president and CEO of Nau, a Portland-based active-wear company that launched online in January, isn’t concerned with normal business models.With a line of clothing that mixes sustainability and style -think Patagonia meets Prada-Nau plans to do nothing less than reinvent the shopping experience. Nau stores, which the company calls “webfronts,” will have a limited inventory of Nau’s entire line (made of recycled materials and recyclable itself). Customers shop for the right sizes and styles, with the choice of ordering at in-store web kiosks for a ten percent discount. Purchases are then delivered by mail from a centralized warehouse-thereby reducing each store’s size and operating costs, and conserving energy. The company plans to open four such “webfronts” across the country this March.Nau’s clothing philosophy is based on what they call a fusion of beauty, performance, and sustainability. “The dominant paradigm suggests you can’t do all three,” says Ian Yolles, vice president of marketing. “We’re doing it all, but none of it matters-sustainability, charity, green ethos-without a killer product.”PEDIGREE Nau president and CEO Chris Van Dyke is the son of Hollywood legend Dick Van Dyke.LEARN MORE nau.com
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

