Explore Your City’s Urban Smellscape With Scent-Based Smelly Maps

Smell your way around town with a new project that merges “olfactory” with “cartography.”

While scent may be the most powerful of our five senses, it’s usually not the one most of us think of when it comes to how we navigate our way through cities both familiar and foreign. Save for instances when we get a nose-full of some extreme scent both good (roasting coffee, fresh cut grass) or bad (hot garbage, pee), we probably don’t spend a whole lot of time thinking about the role our olfactory glands play in our day-to-day lives.

As it happens, though, our sense of smell can actually play a significant role in our spacial understanding of urban centers. Now, thanks to artist, designer, and informational experience design Ph.D candidate Kate McLean, we can begin to fully explore just how our noses shape our understanding of the cities in which we live. McLean heads the team behind Smelly Maps, a new project that blends cartography, urban planning, and social media to present cities as we’ve never seen—or smelled—them before.

McLean’s maps, created with the help of researchers Daniele Quercia, Luca Maria Aiello, and Rossano Schifanella, began with walking tours around seven cities across Europe and the United States, during which participants took notes on the various smells they inhaled along the way. For two cities, London and Barcelona, those notes were then cross-indexed with geo-specific social media tags culled from Twitter and Flickr, and used to create an “Urban Smell Dictionary” consisting of nearly three hundred scent terms from “abattoir” to “zoo.”

Per the Smelly Maps homepage:

The researchers found that the high-level olfactory footprint of Barcelona and London consists of nature and, alas, traffic emissions. At street level, streets with emissions words (e.g., Kensington Road and Park Lane in London) suffer from air pollution, while streets with nature words (e.g., Hyde Park) do not. Where do you expect to find animal smells? In the zoo, of course.

In other words, those city’s smells broke down, broadly, into two camps: Flora/Fauna and car exhaust.

Using their collected data, McLean’s team then created the project’s titular Smelly Maps—graphic representations of what smells can be found where in the cities researched.

London: Animals, via Smelly Maps

Barcelona: Animals, via Smelly Maps

London: Nature/Emissions, via Smelly Maps

Barcelona: Nature/Emissions, via Smelly Maps

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the scent cartography collected by McLean’s team ended up syncing well with existing air purity data, explained researcher Daniele Quercia to PSFK. There, he also touched on some of the project’s possible applications in terms of urban planning, saying:

Researchers need to study all types of smells – not only bad odors (as they typically do) but also pleasurable ones. If they were to do that, there would be a number of ways that the urban smellscape could be altered. A few examples include changing the street layout (to modify the air flow), pedestrianization (to lower traffic emissions), and planting trees (to create restorative environments).

While we’re probably never going to fully turn our sense of urban navigation over to a smell-based system (“Head down 7th and take a right when you smell begonias and dog poop”), the Smelly Maps project offers a unique way to think about our cities. Through McLean’s work—the Smelly Maps themselves, as well as her previous forays into sense-based spacial experience—we examine cities not only as collections of sights and sounds, but as places where the nose knows more than we might otherwise expect.

You can learn more about Smelly Maps on its homepage, and in “Smelly Maps: The Digital Life of Urban Smellscapes,” the scientific paper written for the project.

[via PSFK]

Center for American Progress Action Fund

Tonight's Democratic debate is a must-watch for followers of the 2020 election. And it's a nice distraction from the impeachment inquiry currently enveloping all of the political oxygen in America right now.

For most people, the main draw will be newly anointed frontrunner Pete Buttigieg, who has surprisingly surged to first place in Iowa and suddenly competing in New Hampshire. Will the other Democrats attack him? How will Elizabeth Warren react now that she's no longer sitting alone atop the primary field? After all, part of Buttigieg's rise has been his criticisms of Warren and her refusal to get into budgetary specifics over how she'd pay for her healthcare plan.

The good news is that Joe Biden apparently counts time travel amongst his other resume-building experience.

Keep Reading Show less
Official White House Photo by Sonya N. Hebert

This election cycle, six women threw their hat in the ring for president, but is their gender holding them back? Would Americans feel comfortable with a woman leading the free world? Based on the last election, the answer is a swift no. And a new study backs this up. The study found that only 49% of American men would feel very comfortable with a woman serving as the head of the government. By comparison, 59% of women said they would feel comfortable with a woman in charge.

The Reykjavik Index for Leadership, which measures attitude towards women leaders, evaluated the attitudes of those living in the G7 countries as well as Brazil, China, India, and Russia. 22,000 adults in those 11 countries were surveyed on their attitudes about female leadership in 22 different sectors, including government, fashion, technology, media, banking and finance, education, and childcare.

Only two countries, Canada and the U.K., had a majority of respondents say they would be more comfortable with a female head of state. Germany (which currently has a female Chancellor), Japan, and Russia were the countries least comfortable with a female head of state.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

If you are totally ready to move on from Donald Trump, you're not alone. According to a report last April from the Wason Center National Survey of 2020 Voters, "President Trump will be the least popular president to run for reelection in the history of polling."

Yes, you read that right, "history of polling."

Keep Reading Show less
via Around the NFL / Twitter

After three years on the sidelines, Colin Kapernick will be working out for multiple NFL teams on Saturday, November 16 at the Atlanta Falcons facility.

The former 49er quarterback who inflamed the culture wars by peacefully protesting against social injustice during the national anthem made the announcement on Twitter Tuesday.

Kaepernick is scheduled for a 15-minute on-field workout and an interview that will be recorded and sent to all 32 teams. The Miami Dolphins, Dallas Cowboys, and Detroit Lions are expected to have representatives in attendance.

RELATED: Joe Namath Says Colin Kaepernick And Eric Reid Should Be Playing In The NFL

"We like our quarterback situation right now," Miami head coach, Brian Flores said. "We're going to do our due diligence."

NFL Insider Steve Wyche believes that the workout is the NFL's response to multiple teams inquiring about the 32-year-old quarterback. A league-wide workout would help to mitigate any potential political backlash that any one team may face for making an overture to the controversial figure.

Kapernick is an unrestricted free agent (UFA) so any team could have reached out to him. But it's believed that the interested teams are considering him for next season.

RELATED: Video of an Oakland train employee saving a man's life is so insane, it looks like CGI

Earlier this year, Kaepernick and Carolina Panthers safety Eric Reid reached a financial settlement with the league in a joint collusion complaint. The players alleged that the league conspired to keep them out after they began kneeling during the national anthem in 2016.

Before the 2019 season, Kaepernick posted a video of himself working out on twitter to show he was in great physical condition and ready to play.

Kaepnick took the 49ers to the Super Bowl in 2012 and the NFC Championship game in 2013.

He has the 23rd-highest career passer rating in NFL history, the second-best interception rate, and the ninth-most rushing yards per game of any quarterback ever. In 2016, his career to a sharp dive and he won only of 11 games as a starter.