Why Does Indie Music Hate Lana Del Rey?

Authenticity is used to create indie’s borders, while elite tastemakers serve as border patrol.

Lana Del Rey has been hyped and hated, trafficked and attacked. But if this week’s debut of “China Doll,” an Interscope record deal, and an Odd Future remix tell us anything, it’s that she’s here to stay—for now. From the more unflattering origin stories, we’re told the artist Lizzie Grant modeled herself after Britney Spears until her managers thought her fit to ascend the Best Coast throne. They orchestrated a Mad Men makeover, injected her lips with collagen, and renamed her Lana Del Rey.

The controversy over Del Rey isn’t about her music. It's that she’s “inauthentic,” apparently the worst thing an indie music star can be. Hipster RunOff ran a feature titled “Lana Del Rey EXPOSED: B4 she was alt, she was a failed mnstrm artist without fake lips,” asking, “will she fool the Indiesphere?” The Los Angeles Times flipped Lana’s self-promotional press portrayal as the “gangster Nancy Sinatra” to “ersatz femme fetale.”

But for indie music, “authentic” designates anything but genuineness—it’s just a fetishized form of cool. When artists are labeled authentic by indie tastemakers, it means they've internalized a standard image of indie success and have re-invented themselves accordingly. We congratulate them for saying and doing on their own what they (or Pitchfork) wanted them to say and do all along. Is this so different than Del Rey saying and doing what she is “told” to do?

The critiques against Del Rey come from the same indie music tastemakers that celebrated Best Coast’s Crazy for You without voicing any concern that all 13 tracks of the album feature Bethany Cosentino pining, whining, and worrying over a man. I don’t mean to suggest that we knock down Cosentino’s door for writing my favorite album of last summer, but maybe it’s time that we as critics pull back our focus on individual performers and start questioning the industry.

Amy Klein, former member of the band Titus Andronicus, wrote a scathing explanation of what she terms the “Problem with Lana Del Rey.” Del Rey “has conquered America with plastic surgery, video games, a regression to nostalgia, and an appeal to the sex drive of every male music critic on the planet,” she writes. She calls the singer a “mirror” who reflects her fans’ own depraved, nostalgic longing for a better time when women were objects whose only desire was to be wanted by men, a take that leaves out the role of the music industry and its professionals in producing and distributing marketable images of femininity.

The role of Del Rey’s managers in creating her aesthetic provides an opportunity to critique the industry she (and Klein) are part of. Making Del Rey and her fans the center of criticism instead of her managers, the industry, or the indie genre serves only to strategically protect the actual decisionmakers, and ultimately, the indie brand.

Pitchfork’s Nitush Abebe captures the tension in a column about the controversy, writing that “different genres have totally different rules about the ways in which artists are supposed to be imaginative. And everything I've heard from Del Rey seems caught between them.” That’s exactly why authenticity matters so much to the indie world: it defines the genre as not pop, a separate genre with separate listeners—just as it did for folk, punk, and many others. Authenticity is used to create indie’s borders, while elite tastemakers serve as border patrol, blacklighting IDs before welcoming some and turning others away. Del Rey makes the fatal mistake of appealing to pop listeners, who have to be excluded to maintain indie’s integrity. It’s a fate that befalls musicians who start out with indie cred as well: get too popular, and tastemakers deem you a sellout no longer worthy of their attention.

Klein’s criticisms echo these brand-protecting impulses; by focusing her attention on Del Rey and her fans, she avoids hurling stones at her own glass house. When she writes that “it doesn’t matter if Lana Del Rey is entirely sarcastic,” she denies the possibility and significance of Del Rey self-awareness or distance from her persona. She favors preserving the purity of a tradition of Indie she herself helped shape. Klein has never written a critique of Madonna, Lady Gaga, Beyoncé, Rihanna, Britney Spears, or other members of the pop pinup canon, because they never tried to be indie. The singular rage Del Rey provokes is a result of her threat to indie as a genre, and Klein has a personal stake in the genre’s integrity.

Of course, the indie world’s dirty little secret—and its greatest fear—is that even while claiming innocence, indie reproduces many of the evils of pop. What happens to Lana Del Rey and all those scapegoated, formerly-known-as-indie artists? Cut off like gangrenous appendages, they turn into phantom limbs and haunt the body of indie forever.

via David Leavitt / Twitter

Anyone who has ever worked in retail knows that the worst thing about the job, right after the pay, are the unreasonable cheapskates who "want to talk to your manager" to get some money off an item.

They think that throwing a tantrum will save them a few bucks and don't care if they completely embarrass themselves in the process. Sometimes that involves belittling the poor employee who's just trying to get through their day with an ounce of dignity.

Twitter is rallying around a gal named Tori who works at a Target in Massachusetts after she was tweet-shamed by irate chapekate, journalist, and Twitter troll, David Leavitt.

Keep Reading

Childbirth is the number one reason American women visit the hospital, and it ain't cheap. In fact, it's getting more and more expensive. A new study published in Health Affairs found that the cost of having a baby with employer-sponsored health insurance increased by almost 50% in the past seven years.

The study evaluated "trends in cost-sharing for maternity care for women with employer-based health insurance plans, before and after the Affordable Care Act," which was signed into law in 2010. The study looked at over 657,061 women enrolled in large employer-sponsored health insurance plans who delivered babies between 2008 and 2015, as these plans tend to cover more than plans purchased by small businesses or individuals.

Keep Reading

A meteorite crashed into Earth nearly 800,000 years ago. The meteor was 1.2 miles wide, and the impact was so big, it covered 10% of the planet with debris. However, scientists haven't been able to find the impact site for over a century. That is, until now. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal believes the crash site has been located.

Tektites, which are essentially rocks that have been liquefied from the heat of the impact and then cooled to form glass, help scientists spot the original impact site of a meteor. Upon impact, melted material is thrown into the atmosphere, then falls back to the ground. Even if the original crater has disappeared due to erosion or is hidden by a shift in tectonic plates, tektites give the spot away. Tektites between 750,000 to 35.5 million years old have been found in every continent except Antarctica.

Keep Reading