As new hybrids of philanthropy and business exercise growing economic power, the White House’s top adviser on do-goodery wants to increase the government’s support for social enterprise.

In the bright first months after his inauguration, President Barack Obama launched the White House Office of Social Innovation and Civic Engagement, a bureaucratic grab-bag with responsibilities for community service, investing in successful and innovative community initiatives, and “new models of partnership.”


“Did you know about this job?” Jonathan Greenblatt, a social entrepreneur and the office’s new director, asks me at the beginning of our interview, both an indication of the office’s modest public presence and the administration’s aim of increasing its importance.

“What we need to do is to create an enabling environment for the impact economy,” Greenblatt says. “We can’t pick winners, but we can create the conditions in which entrepreneurs and intrepreneurs at large corporations can be successful at driving financial returns, creating good jobs, and generating social and environmental impact.”

Though he is only days into his tenure at SICP, Greenblatt’s comments reveal developments in the administration’s approach to solving thorny public problems.

While he has yet to outline any specific agenda beyond supporting SICP’s current successes, his focus on the “impact economy”—he helped organize the first White House conference on social enterprise while working at the Aspen Institute—suggest the White House wants to do more than help nonprofits scale up and expand service opportunities.

“How do we build on the momentum and make sure we’re focused on the President’s priorities, particularly economic renewal and job creation?” Greenblatt asks. “We’ll be looking pretty hard at what we call the impact economy—social enterprise and impact investing, where we can explore how do we leverage market forces and engage investors and entrepreneurs and investors to tackle these tough problems.”

Greenblatt replaces Sonal Shah, the economist who started the office after working on development and sustainability Google and Goldman Sachs. Greenblatt’s resume is equally impressive, including time in the Clinton administration; at Ethos Water, a successful social enterprise he and a partner sold to Starbucks in 2005; a stint as CEO of GOOD, the media company that publishes this website (he left well before I was hired) and the founding of All For Good, a web service for volunteers.

Greenblatt is now commuting between Los Angeles, where he was a professor at UCLA’s Anderson School of Business, and Washington, where he will have a small staff, a small (by Washington standards) budget and a massive mandate. Can he take such a diffuse set of tools and leverage them toward new models of public problem solving—and just as important, jobs?

“Social enterprises, for-profit, nonprofit—I think these distinctions are almost kind of frustrating,” Greenblatt says. “The goal is how to create businesses that create jobs and solve problems with sound business models.”

In its short existence, the agency’s successes have included supporting the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act, an expansion of national service championed by the late liberal legislator, and the establishment of a Social Innovation Fund that rewards nonprofit organizations that have demonstrated an ability to improve their communities.

“The idea is to take what works and bring it to scale,” Greenblatt says. “What the social innovation fund is doing is providing capital to nonprofits with proven models—this is an evidence-based approach—and help them scale.”

The office also cleared the way for $100 million in social impact bonds proposed as part of this year’s federal budget. The pilot project is designed to make competitive incentives drive public programs. The government outlines policy metrics—anti-poverty, worker retraining, and the like—and private organizations bid on specific improvement goals. If they succeed, the government pays them back for their work, but if they fail, they get nothing.

Greenblatt cites these bonds as just one tool to help leverage limited government resources for the greater public good. He’s hopeful that his office can help do more to develop a framework for social entrepreneurs to succeed in everything from fundraising to scaling up successful programs.

“People are building these businesses; developing these creative solutions … they’re just doing it, driving results,” he says. “The big thing we need to do is create a dialogue with those people, and listen, and learn, and help the people who are pioneering these efforts continue to succeed.”

Photo via (cc) Flickr user EnergeticNYC

  • Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away
    Dogs have impressive observational powers.Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.

    “A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”

    His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.

    pregnancy signs, dogs and pregnancy, pitbull behavior, pet intuition, dog overprotection, Reddit stories, viral Reddit, dog instincts, canine emotions, dog owner tips
    Otis knew before they did. Canva

    Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.

    So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”

    The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.

    Any chance your wife is pregnant?

    ZZBC | Reddit

    The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!

    “The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”

    Redditors responded with similar experiences.

    Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.

    realityisworse | Reddit

    So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?

    Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”

    The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.

  • ,

    Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

    Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

    While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

    When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

    Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.


Explore More Articles Stories

Articles

Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Articles

11 hilarious posts describe the everyday struggles of being a woman