The expand-at-all-costs model used by so many retail and food chains over the past decades is a wrap, and it’s been interesting to see what some of the massive chains are coming up with as a new plan. Which brings us to Starbucks, which is opening three unbranded coffee and tea houses in Seattle.So what does “unbranded” even mean? No logos, customer-organized poetry readings, wine and beer in the evenings, bring-your-own-CD-and-put-it-on policies, etc. Even the name “Starbucks” only appears in a small font, in a few locations, with the phrase “Inspired by Starbucks.” (Unclear whether the tall, grande, venti sizing has also been retired.)This seems to have the potential to create a whole different kind of location-specific loyalty (not to be confused with the “brand loyalty” every company seems to have been trying to create for eons)-a far cry from the latte-to-go-within-spitting-distance-of-wherever-you-are model. Main angle here: Local.Is it, as one blog called it, “one of the more brazen attempts by a corporation to disguise itself as a locally owned business”? Or, as another put it, an example of Starbucks “returning to its roots”?We haven’t been to one yet, so we’re not going to weigh in, but as an idea, it’s undeniably compelling.Image via Full disclosure: GOOD occasionally works with Starbucks, like on our GOOD Sheet project.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

