When the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) became law in 1990, it offered legal protections to prevent discrimination against employees with disabilities in the workforce. There is one law it did not overturn — the ability for employers to pay some workers with disabilities less than minimum wage. Now the government is asking for feedback on this law in a national online dialogue.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which was passed in 1938, mandated protections for most workers across the country. Most notably, it guaranteed a minimum wage. FLSA also included another provision, section 14(C), that legalized subminimum wage for some people with disabilities. The initial purpose of issuing 14(C) certificates was to give companies financial incentive to hire “workers who have disabilities that impair their productivity for the work being performed.”


According to a database kept by the U.S. Department of Labor, nearly 100,000 workers with disabilities get paid under a 14(C) waiver. Employers must submit an application to receive approval to pay workers subminimum wage — it’s not available to every employer. A 14(C) certificate also does not allow any employer to pay any person with a disability at subminimum wage.

“Section 14(C) does not apply unless the disability actually impairs the worker’s earning or productive capacity for the work being performed,” according to a Department of Labor fact sheet. “The fact that a worker may have a disability is not in and of itself sufficient to warrant the payment of a subminimum wage.”

To receive a 14(C) waiver, employers must calculate the time it takes an employee without disabilities to complete a task compared to an employee with disabilities. For example, if it took a non-disabled worker five minutes to assemble a part at $12 an hour and a disabled worker took three times as long to assemble the same part, under section 14(C), the employer could legally pay the disabled worker three times less or $4 an hour. An NBC News investigation found one Goodwill location paid workers as low as $0.22 an hour. Current federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour.

The 14(C) provision in the Labor Act, however, is often prone to exploitation by bad-actor companies. In 2018, for example, the Labor Department revoked the 14(C) certificate of Rock River Valley Self Help Enterprises in Illinois. An investigation found nearly 250 employees with disabilities were exploited. After some shifts, Self Help paid employees with gift cards rather than a paycheck.

For disability advocates, employment has long been a difficult issue. In 2016, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported about 18 percent of people with disabilities were employed compared to 65 percent of those without disabilities. A 2017 report produced by the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics found the median yearly salary of people with disabilities with a third less than people without disabilities. More than 20 percent of people with disabilities qualify as low income.

There are other factors that may keep people with disabilities locked into low income or lower-paying jobs. Karin Willison, The Mighty’s disability editor, pointed out critical disability benefits such as supplemental security income (SSI) and Medicaid coverage require you to have less than $2,000 in assets if you’re single and $3,000 as a couple. This makes it more challenging for people with disabilities who want to work.

According to Vox, another part of the issue is society has historically had low expectations for people with disabilities. People with disabilities are often segregated at jobs like “sheltered workshops” (now classified as “work centers“) that hire only workers with disabilities to do menial tasks, pay subminimum wage and may offer some rehabilitation or skills training. Work centers are just one type of employer that can qualify for a 14(C) certificate.

Thanks primarily to disabled advocates who fought for inclusion, Vox noted the attitude people with disabilities aren’t capable or need to be segregated is starting to change. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP) national online dialogue on section 14(C) is a step toward reevaluating employment opportunities for people with disabilities.

The online forum asks for feedback on the experiences of section 14(C) stakeholders and ideas for the future of fair labor standards for people with disabilities. With a variety of stakeholders in the mix — people with disabilities, parents of kids with disabilities and 14(C) employers — the forum has already elicited a good deal of debate. Several commenters have called for eliminating section 14(C). KTRights wrote:

It is time for a complete phase-out of the use of 14(c) certificates and sub-minimum wage for ALL people with disabilities. Why is it that people with disabilities are the only population that can be paid less than minimum wage and it’s seen as acceptable? We will never have equal rights or be considered for competitive, integrated employment when the federal government doesn’t amend an archaic law from 1938 that completely devalues individuals with disabilities.

To share your feedback about section 14(C) and fair labor standards for people with disabilities, visit the Department of Labor’s national online dialogue forum here.

This article originally appeared on The Mighty. You can read it here.

  • Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away
    Dogs have impressive observational powers.Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.

    “A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”

    His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.

    pregnancy signs, dogs and pregnancy, pitbull behavior, pet intuition, dog overprotection, Reddit stories, viral Reddit, dog instincts, canine emotions, dog owner tips
    Otis knew before they did. Canva

    Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.

    So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”

    The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.

    Any chance your wife is pregnant?

    ZZBC | Reddit

    The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!

    “The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”

    Redditors responded with similar experiences.

    Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.

    realityisworse | Reddit

    So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?

    Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”

    The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.

  • ,

    Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

    Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

    While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

    When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

    Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.


Explore More Articles Stories

Articles

Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Articles

11 hilarious posts describe the everyday struggles of being a woman