GOOD

What Cultural Differences Can Reveal About the Way We Learn

The same lesson is experienced differently by learners from different cultures. #ProjectLiteracy

Beijing at Twilight. A longitudinal study is comparing students at USC with those at Beijing Normal University in China—two groups with different ideals about when and how to appropriately express emotion. Image via Flickr user Jonathan Kos-Read.

How does one learn to read? If you’ve helped a child of your own learn her letters, you probably would tell me about words and letter sounds; how you helped her make the connection between language and symbols. But two more vital factors may be at play that you’ve likely never considered: emotion and culture. New work from Mary-Helen Immordino-Yang’s lab at the University of Southern California (USC) Rossier School of Education has revealed that emotions powerfully shape the way that we experience the world around us—as well as how we learn from it. What’s more, emotion is strongly influenced by an individual’s culture and social environment.


Says Immordino-Yang:

“There’s a lot of evidence—and we all intuitively sense—that individuals construct different kinds of meaning out of emotional and social situations. We wanted to get a handle on the ways in which that meaning-making process influences how kids come to experience the world and how they learn. We’ve long assumed that emotion had no place in learning. That, in fact, it may actually interfere with it. But studies have shown that that is a false assumption. It’s impossible—actually neurobiologically impossible—to have any kind of complex, meaningful thought without some emotional content in it. We are biologically built not to waste energy thinking about things we don’t care about.”

Immordino-Yang and colleagues are currently in the middle of a cross-cultural longitudinal study, comparing students at USC with those at Beijing Normal University in China—two groups with different ideals about when and how to appropriately express emotion. For example, typical Chinese culture puts emphasis on being less emotive, while Americans are generally encouraged to be more outwardly expressive. In the first phase of the study, participants’ brains were scanned as they viewed 40 true documentary-style narratives about extraordinary teenagers from around the globe. The stories were intended to elicit an emotional response: compassion for physical pain, admiration for a physical skill, empathy for social pain, or admiration for a virtue. The researchers discovered some intriguing brain differences from the two different cultural groups in the anterior insula, the area of the brain that maps visceral states and makes us aware of our feelings in the context of our environment, suggesting that our ability to construct conscious experiences of social emotion is influenced by the culture in which we are raised.

“There were no differences at all in how much these young adults’ brains were activating when they responded to our emotional stories—and no differences in the strengths of emotions that participants in the different cultural groups reported,” says Immordino-Yang. “But there was a strong cultural difference in how patterns of neural activity corresponded in real-time with participants’ experience—in how people became aware of their emotion.”

Guinevere Eden, a scientist at Georgetown University’s Center for the Study of Learning says the study’s findings so far are compelling. Her own work, for example, has demonstrated that unlike American children, who learn to read mainly by listening, Chinese children’s reading abilities are strongly tied to their writing skills because of the language’s particular meaning-based alphabet. So an understanding of both cultural norms and practices when it comes to language acquisition—and the emotions such practices may influence—may help us develop better interventions for helping individual children who may be struggling with literacy in the future.

“Reading is a cultural skill, it’s uniquely human—it’s essentially a very special skill acquisition that is critical to academic outcomes,” says Eden. “But some aspects of learning to read are trickier than others. And it would make sense that emotional and cultural aspects would influence what is a very complex process.”

Immordino-Yang says that the education system could really benefit from harnessing more emotion in teaching practices when it comes to reading or learning about other academic subjects. Finding ways to make students care may help them better learn the things they need to succeed. Adds Immordino-Yang:

“Think about all those four-year-old kids who fall in love with dinosaurs—who want to know all about them. It’s not that we expect all these kids to become paleontologists one day. But they are demonstrating an intrinsic satisfaction in becoming an expert in this domain. Nobody is drilling them on dinosaur flash cards. They want to learn and they can learn about dinosaurs because teachers and parents will point them to resources, show them how to use them, and then let them see what it feels like to follow their interests. Such experiences shouldn’t be limited to preschool. We should provide kids of all ages with really rich learning environments where there are resources and opportunities for them to really engage, and experts to help steer them. Schools don’t emphasize that feeling of satisfaction enough, that feeling of learning about something you really care about. And that’s the kind of learning we should be supporting all through the school years in age-appropriate ways.”

But beyond that, Immordino-Yang argues that new results about emotion, culture, and the brain challenge many assumptions that scientists and educators have about how human beings learn in general. They give us new ways to consider teaching practices and academic environments, she says—and raise new questions to investigate. She says:

“We’re learning that what’s happening on the outside—the same story, the same lesson—can be interpreted differently, experienced differently, by different learners. So we really need to start to unpack the roles of school culture and individual variability when we think about how children learn. We need to understand that the way kids feel matters. Their embodied experience in the classroom powerfully influences what children take away and how they grow both academically and personally. What science is teaching us, in short, is the need to understand the holistic emotional experience of a person, and the need to account for subjective experience when we design and evaluate educational environments. Doing so can hopefully inform more effective teaching practices.”

Articles
via Chela Horsdal / Twitter

Amazon's "The Man in the High Castle" debuted the first episode of its final season last week.

The show is loosely based on an alternative history novel by Philip K. Dick that postulates what would happen if Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan controlled the United States after being victorious in World War II.

Keep Reading Show less
Politics
via Mike Mozart / Flickr

Chick-fil-A is the third-largest fast food chain in America, behind McDonald's and Starbucks, raking in over $10 billion a year.

But for years, the company has faced boycotts for supporting anti-LGBT charities, including the Salvation Army, the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and the Paul Anderson Youth Home.

The Salvation Army faced criticism after a leader in the organization implied that gay people "deserve to die" and the company also came under fire after refusing to offer same-sex couples health insurance. But the organization swears it's evolving on such issues.

via Thomas Hawk / Flickr

The Fellowship of Christian Athletes explicitly announced it was anti gay marriage in a recent "Statement of Faith."

God instituted marriage between one man and one woman as the foundation of the family and the basic structure of human society. For this reason, we believe that marriage is exclusively the union of one man and one woman.

The Paul Anderson Youth Home teaches boys that homosexuality is wrong and that same-sex marriage is "rage against Jesus Christ and His values."

RELATED: The 1975's singer bravely kissed a man at a Dubai concert to protest anti-LGBT oppression

In 2012, Chick-fil-A's CEO, Dan Cathy, made anti same-sex marriage comments on a radio broadcast:

I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, "We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage". I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.

But the chicken giant has now decided to change it's says its charitable donation strategy because it's bad for business...Not because being homophobic is wrong.

The company recently lost several bids to provide concessions in U.S. airports. A pop-up shop in England was told it would not be renewed after eight days following LGBTQ protests.

Chick-fil-A also has plans to expand to Boston, Massachusetts where its mayor, Thomas Menino, pledged to ban the restaurant from the city.

via Wikimedia Commons

"There's no question we know that, as we go into new markets, we need to be clear about who we are," Chick-fil-A President and Chief Operating Officer Tim Tassopoulos told Bisnow. "There are lots of articles and newscasts about Chick-fil-A, and we thought we needed to be clear about our message."

RELATED: Alan Turing will appear on the 50-pound note nearly 70 years after being persecuted for his sexuality

Instead, the Chick-fil-A Foundation plans to give $9 million to organizations that support education and fight homelessness. Which is commendable regardless of the company's troubled past.

"If Chick-Fil-A is serious about their pledge to stop holding hands with divisive anti-LGBTQ activists, then further transparency is needed regarding their deep ties to organizations like Focus on the Family, which exist purely to harm LGBTQ people and families," Drew Anderson, GLAAD's director of campaigns and rapid response, said in a statement.

Chick-fil-A's decision to back down from contributing to anti-LGBT charities shows the power that people have to fight back against companies by hitting them where it really hurts — the pocket book.

The question remains: If you previously avoided Chick-fil-A because it supported anti-LGBT organizations, is it now OK to eat there? Especially when Popeye's chicken sandwich is so good people will kill for it?

Lifestyle

Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr and nrkbeta / flickr

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) dropped a bombshell on Tuesday, announcing it had over 900 emails that White House aide Stephen Miller sent to former Breitbart writer and editor Katie McHugh.

According to the SPLC, in the emails, Miller aggressively "promoted white nationalist literature, pushed racist immigration stories and obsessed over the loss of Confederate symbols after Dylann Roof's murderous rampage."

Keep Reading Show less
Politics
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less
Business