This morning the Obama administration announced the formation of a new “climate service,” an agency “aimed at providing long-term forecasts to assist fisheries managers, farmers, state governments, renewable energy developers, water managers and others,” according to Greenwire. The new agency will fall under the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and head Jane Lubchenco, who appeared with Commerce Secretary Gary Locke to make the announcement this morning.Locke likened the new agency to the National Weather Service, explaining: “This will provide a single point of contact, a one-stop shop for businesses and government that need NOAA’s high-quality forecasting for making predictions…They turn to the Weather Service for making predictions in the short range, now we need the climate service … because increasingly climate change is affecting everyone’s bottom line.”The Climate Service is a reorganization more than an entirely new endeavor. It will bring into closer contact existing climate science from throughout many government agencies. The current director of the National Climatic Data Center, Thomas Karl, will serve as temporary director, along with six regional directors.Diagram courtesy of Pew Center on Global Climate ChangeThis post originally appeared on www.refresheverything.com, as part of GOOD’s collaboration with the Pepsi Refresh Project, a catalyst for world-changing ideas. Find out more about the Refresh campaign, or to submit your own idea today.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

