GOOD

Food Safety Bill Brought Back from the Dead

In a surprise vote on Sunday evening, the Senate passed the Food Safety Modernization Act, which now looks set to become law. But will it work?


For a lame duck session, the Senate is really cranking. This weekend brought the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" by a majority of 65 to 31 (including a lot of Democrats who voted for it 17 years ago, but finally changed their minds) on Saturday, followed by the surprise resurrection of the Food Safety Bill on Sunday evening, with even more bipartisan support.

Formally known as the Food Safety Modernization Act, the bill has followed a particularly tortured path through the legislative process. The House passed its version a year and a half ago, in July 2009. Wrangling about the potential impact of the proposed regulations on small food producers, filibuster threats, and other business kept the Senate from passing their own bill until November 2010.


Two weeks ago, Democrats admitted there was a small problem. The Senate's inclusion of a provision that would allow the FDA to impose fees on companies whose food is recalled meant that the bill was a revenue-raising measure, and according to the U.S. Constitution, all revenue-raising measures must originate in the House.

Politicians, journalists, and activists alike had given up the bill for dead, and the Sunday evening announcement that the Senate had unanimously passed it was met with universal surprise.

The Food Safety Modernization Act is the first significant update to food safety legislation passed in 1906, the same year that Upton Sinclair's novel The Jungle exposed horrifying conditions in Chicago's meat-packing plants. It finally gives the FDA the authority to recall contaminated products (at the moment, all recalls are voluntary), and mandates the creation of a national food tracing system, to streamline the process of finding an outbreak's source.

But although some food safety advocates are happy this morning (among them New York University professor Marion Nestle and Bill Marler, publisher of Food Safety News), others see the bill as ineffective or even downright misguided.

The massive recalls of recent years (including 380 million eggs this summer alone) certainly revealed the weaknesses of a food system in which one burger can contain parts from 100 or more different cows, as well as the FDA's limited resources—for example, agency inspectors had never visited Jack DeCoster's insanitary factory farms in Iowa, despite repeated warnings by public health officials.

However, while the new bill includes funding to hire more inspectors, it also puts the food safety focus on paperwork, requiring producers to submit risk assessment and implement Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points (HACCP) safety plans. These monitoring and management requirements actually favor larger, industrial-scale operations, whose volume of business makes the increased burden of compliance affordable—and yet it is precisely this kind of consolidation that creates the conditions for such large-scale outbreaks to happen in the first place.

In short, then: will the passing of the Food Safety Modernization "protect American families from encountering contaminated food," as Harry Reid promised? No, but it's still better than nothing. As my colleague Peter concluded when the Senate first passed this bill last month:

Small may be beautiful and small may eventually lead to a paradigm shift, but the most important thing to remember about any food safety bill is that it should reduce levels of illness and death. To do that, we’ve got to take on the 99 percent of farms and food producers that are causing illnesses and right now, unfortunately, they are not on the fringe. They're consistently the country’s largest food producers.

\n

IMAGE: Scanning electron micrograph of E. coli, via Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institutes of Health.

Articles
via Alan Levine / Flickr

The World Health Organization is hoping to drive down the cost of insulin by encouraging more generic drug makers to enter the market.

The organization hopes that by increasing competition for insulin, drug manufacturers will be forced to lower their prices.

Currently, only three companies dominate the world insulin market, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. Over the past three decades they've worked to drastically increase the price of the drug, leading to an insulin availability crisis in some places.

In the United States, the price of insulin has increased from $35 a vial to $275 over the past two decades.

Keep Reading Show less
Health

Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

Since the International Whaling Commission banned commercial whaling in 1986, whale populations have been steadily recovering. However, whales in the wild still face other dangers. In the summer of 2018, four Russian companies that supply aquariums with marine animals captured almost 100 beluga whales and killer whales (aka orcas). After a public outcry, those whales are swimming free as the last of the captive whales have been released, the first time this many captured whales have been released back into the wild.

In late 2018 and early 2019, a drone captured footage of 11 orcas and 87 beluga whales crammed into holding pens in the Srednyaya Bay. The so-called "whale jail" made headlines, and authorities began to investigate their potentially illegal capture.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less
Business
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

The 2020 election is a year away, but Donald Trump has some serious ground to cover if he doesn't want it to be a historical blowout.

A Washington Post- ABC News poll released Tuesday shows that Trump loses by double digits to the top Democratic contenders.

Vice President Joe Biden (56%-39%); Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (54%-39%); Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont (56%-39%); South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg (52%-41%); and Sen. Kamala Harris of California (52%-41%) all have big leads over the president.

Keep Reading Show less
Politics