GOOD

Get Your DNA Tested, But Don’t Expect a Party

Are genetic testing companies making us obsess about the stupid stuff, while we forget to test for what matters? Spit parties, online social networking built around DNA similarities, catchy details about which celebrities you most resemble-what fun! These are just some of the things one of the major..


Are genetic testing companies making us obsess about the stupid stuff, while we forget to test for what matters?

Spit parties, online social networking built around DNA similarities, catchy details about which celebrities you most resemble-what fun! These are just some of the things one of the major genetic testing companies, 23andMe, offers to anyone who can pay to play.And playfully paying we are. But there's a catch: the information these companies offer can make people worry about the wrong things-or give them a false sense of security-without giving them the information they really need. A tiny increase in a person's likelihood of developing a non-fatal disease can make them overly preoccupied about a negligible risk, when real harms might lurk in their spit-cup.For between $399 and $2,500, four prominent companies allow a person to purchase genetic data about their disease proclivities and personal traits. Big names including Google co-founder Sergey Brin (whose wife is a co-founder of 23andMe) have participated, as have numerous reporters and regular folks. With the cost of tests decreasing, even Main Street can join the fun.What the mainstream genetic testing companies do not do-for cost and ethical reasons-is test for the scarier, highly predictive genetic predispositions. This is the DNA data you actually need to know.To learn whether you have a significantly elevated risk of developing breast cancer, for example, you would likely go to your hospital, which would send your blood to a laboratory, neither of which offers you social networking, folders full of random fun facts, or other perks. The most important genetic tests make a lousy game.Companies like 23andMe, Navigenics, and DeCODEme have good reason to steer clear of the breast cancer test in particular. To start with, most medical professionals agree that it should always be accompanied by genetic counseling. If a woman carries the so-called BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (BRCA for "breast cancer"), her lifetime risk of developing breast cancer can be as high as 80 percent, and her risk of ovarian and uterine cancer also goes up. The fun-loving genetic profile purveyors recognize that they are ill-equipped to guide women through decisions about how to handle and act on this information.At a time when companies are making genetics gimmicky, we risk losing sight of which genetic data is actually useful. The more predictive tests, like those for breast cancer, and as of last year, prostate cancer, help people decide whether to get aggressive screenings and take precautionary measures. And while some of those measures are invasive, they can be lifesavers.Removing breasts is thought to bring breast cancer risk down to two percent, and removing ovaries can lower the risk of developing the disease by up to 50 percent. Men with a family history of prostate cancer and four or five DNA variants have a cancer risk ten times higher than men with no risk factors. These men will benefit from more intensive monitoring that could detect cancer at an earlier, treatable stage.Some people fear that health insurance companies might use genetic information against them by denying health coverage or raising premiums, and that employers could discriminate. But now that the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was signed into law in May, there is less reason for people to avoid the more telling tests. GINA makes genetic discrimination illegal.In fact, having your DNA scrutinized can be a wise financial decision. Most insurance companies will pay for a BRCA-positive woman to undergo yearly MRI screenings starting at age twenty-five, saving the woman thousands of dollars and allowing her to catch developments that a mammogram would miss. Insurance also covers breast removal and reconstruction for women with a mutation.It's not that DNA testing should be taken lightly. Rather, it should be taken more seriously than your neighbor's spit party. Testing for cancer is not easy on the emotions, especially for young people. Several academic studies have shown that women under 35 confront unique fears when they learn they carry a BRCA mutation.My own study showed that young women with elevated cancer risks often feel stressed about finding and sustaining relationships once they know they carry a mutation and are considering surgery. These women fret over the possibility of passing a genetic mutation on to their progeny and feel pressured to finish having children so they can remove their ovaries soon thereafter.It is lamentable that the best options for women with BRCA mutations may involve removing body parts. But preventive surgery is less disruptive than surgery after cancer has developed and spread.Remember this the next time you find yourself spitting into a cup at one of the trendy DNA parties sweeping the nation: there's a big difference between genetic profiles and the kind of genetic information that can help people make decisions that could save their lives.
Articles

When former Pittsburgh Steelers' center Mike Webster committed suicide in 2002, his death began to raise awareness of the brain damage experienced by NFL football players. A 2017 study found that 99% of deceased NFL players had a degenerative brain disease known as CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy). Only one out of 111 former football players had no sign of CTE. It turns out, some of the risks of traumatic brain injury experienced by heavily padded adults playing at a professional level also exist for kids with developing brains playing at a recreational level. The dangers might not be as intense as what the adults go through, but it can have some major life-long consequences.

A new PSA put out by the Concussion Legacy Foundation raises awareness of the dangers of tackle football on developing brains, comparing it to smoking. "Tackle football is like smoking. The younger I start, the longer I am exposed to danger. You wouldn't let me smoke. When should I start tackling?" a child's voice can be heard saying in the PSA as a mother lights up a cigarette for her young son.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

On Tuesday morning, President Trump tweeted about some favorable economic numbers, claiming that annual household income is up, unemployment is low, and housing prices are high.

Now, just imagine how much better those numbers would be if the country wasn't mired in an economy-killing trade war with China, bleeding out trillion-dollar-a-year debts, and didn't suffer from chaotic leadership in the Oval Office?

At the end of tweet, came an odd sentence, "Impeach the Pres."

Keep Reading Show less
Politics

October is domestic violence awareness month and when most people think of domestic violence, they imagine mostly female victims. However, abuse of men happens as well – in both heterosexual and homosexual relationships. But some are taking it upon themselves to change all that.

Keep Reading Show less
Culture

At this point most reasonable people agree that climate change is a serious problem. And while a lot of good people are working on solutions, and we're all chipping in by using fewer plastic bags, it's also helpful to understand where the leading causes of the issue stem from. The list of 20 leading emitters of carbon dioxide by The Guardian newspaper does just that.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via International Labour Organization / Flickr and Michael Moore / Facebook

Before the release of "The Joker" there was a glut of stories in the media about the film's potential to incite violence.

The FBI issued a warning, saying the film may inspire violence from a group known as the Clowncels, a subgroup of the involuntarily celibate or Incel community.

Incels an online subculture who believe they are unable to attract a sexual partner. The American nonprofit Southern Poverty Law Center describes them as "part of the online male supremacist ecosystem" that is included in its list of hate groups.

Keep Reading Show less
Culture