GOOD

How Designers Will Re-engineer Our Relationship With Government


When a conference delegate exclaimed in a loud whisper, "Ooh, it feels like San Francisco '97 in here!" at the Gov 2.0 Summit last week, should I have gotten the tour T-shirt signed there and then, or was it time to start worrying?Lessons from the last dot-com frenzy would suggest caution: hang back, leave a little Kool-aid in the can, avoid the bugs of first releases, adopt late with savvy, and then tell everyone you were there at the beginning. In this case, there's another problem: Public technology initiatives are funded by tax dollars, not angel investors. Accountability, the threat of elections, expectations raised by other service experiences, and the zeal of do-gooding developers all have a part to play in driving improvements and innovation in public services.Government administrators are experts on the public service mission and the business of governing-from local to federal. And geeks know what's technically feasible: They are, for example, happy to mine public databases for meaningful information and reveal previously unseen patterns with policy implications. But someone needs to focus on who this is actually serving: the people. And that's where designers, the unlikely stewards of citizenship, come in.Service designers-who tend to be rigorous thinkers, great story-tellers, and experienced opportunity-spotters-have a way of framing possibilities and, much like regulators, a knack for turning what seems ridiculous today into the obvious and expected of tomorrow. And they are seasoned brokers of client requirements and end-user needs. So when Silicon Valley's product innovation meets the Beltway's org charts, it will be designers who are representing the interests of citizens at the center of any Gov 2.0 initiative.This isn't just about showing off widgets, beautifying tax forms, or giving the census a new typeface. Creativity can and must be applied to the driest technocratic details in order to deliver seamless, intuitive, accessible, and engaging services that create new ways for people and government to interact.At the Summit, both Dave Warner (CEO of MindTel, and a former Navy medic) and Clay Shirky (the author of Here Comes Everybody) argued that to succeed, tech-mediated civic participation must allow for radical inclusion, and for transactions created for, by, and between citizens and government. That doesn't imply mob rule and a diminished role for bureaucrats; merely a change in responsibility. Expert administrators become curators, licensors of public services, and facilitators of transparent transactions within the public realm, but they remain specialists who are able to govern flexibly and coherently and at a massive scale.The opportunity now, as government goes online, is to invite civic participation through all kinds of properly regulated, tech-mediated services. The timing is right. The network is installed, and the electorate is digitally savvy. And it seems like we have a new administration that might be able to do something about it.Guest blogger Rachel Abrams is in D.C. to listen in to the wisdom of the technorati, grass-roots idealist application designers, public officials, and social media gurus at the Gov 2.0 summit. See her previous post coverage here. Photo (cc) by Flickr user ChrisAmico.
Articles
via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading
Culture

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading