GOOD

In Bhutan, 'Gross National Happiness' for Some, Exile and Refugee Camps for Others Jonathan Harris's Balloons of Bhutan Shows Happiness for Some

Multimedia artist Jonathan Harris tells the story of Bhutanese happiness while overlooking the struggles of minority refugee groups

Curious about Balloons of Bhutan? See a slideshow of Jonathan Harris's work here.


Imagine a country where happiness is the guiding principal of government. Imagine a people who see all life as sacred and the source of their happiness, a place with an abundance of clean and renewable energy, a nation committed to preserving its culture. Imagine a Kingdom where the King lives in a simple wooden cottage and judges his progress by the country’s ‘Gross National Happiness.’ Where is this Shangri-La? Bhutan.

\n

So goes the synopsis of the Emmy-winning documentary Bhutan: Taking the Path to Middle Happiness. The romantic hyperbole is consistent with popular characterizations of the isolated nation in the Himalayas. Outsiders are particularly fascinated by the king of Bhutan’s 1972 decision to reject tracking Gross Domestic Product in favor of the concept of Gross National Happiness, a prosperity metric which weighs cultural and environmental preservation as well as economic development.

This quirky focus has fueled an outpouring of writing about Bhutan, from a chapter in the bestselling book The Geography of Bliss that follows “one grump’s search for happiest places” to a cross-country expedition and travel blogging project that kicked off last week, led by a team of “athletes and entrepreneurs." Last month, multimedia artist Jonathan Harris unveiled the latest contribution to the investigation of GNH with his art project “Ballons of Bhutan,” a website and photo gallery he describes as “a portrait of happiness in the last Himalayan kingdom.”

But by focusing entirely on the Bhutanese people's happiness, Harris ignores the government's mass resettlement program that kicked out one-sixth of the nation's population in the name of ethnic purity. In doing so, he does a disservice to the refugees, as well as to viewers of his project who believe it to be a fair representation of life in Bhutan.

Harris, who’s known for blending art, storytelling, and computer science, spent two weeks in Bhutan asking 117 people the same five questions about their favorite memory, one wish, and what they'd do if they were king. Subjects were asked to rank their happiness on a scale from one to 10 and inflate the corresponding number of balloons. (The average response is 6.9 balloons). Harris paired each question’s response with a portrait of the subject, showing the palms of his hands or a goofy expression. “I thought it would be fun to do something a little more silly,” Harris says in the project’s introduction. “Because it’s happiness, after all. It’s supposed to be somewhat silly.”

The digital art project is impressive in its execution: The site moves effortlessly from one interviewee to the next. The pictures are crisp and colorful and capture a diverse slice of life in Bhutan, including interview subjects from monks to a meteorologist. Yet Harris' interviews barely scratch the surface of people’s identities—he deliberately avoids politics, focusing on the mundane, on cuteness over controversy. He asks one man what he likes to do when he hangs out with his friends, interrupting to suggest maybe he likes playing pool. He asks several people why they like the color blue. ("That’s the color of the sky," they respond). You can hear little self-aware smiles in Harris’s affirmative “a-ha's” that prod his subjects to keep talking when their replies are lost in translation, as they often are.

The only time his questioning approaches critique is when he asks people what they’d like to change about Bhutan. But even then, the responses are overwhelmingly positive. Birdy Namgay, who imports fashionable clothing to a store in Thimpu, the capital, is hanging out at her city’s trendiest after-hours spot, a bowling alley, at the time of her interview. “Not really. Nothing. I’m happy,” she responds.

Of course, not all Bhutanese people feel that way. In the early 1990s, the Bhutanese government began expelling Lhotshampas, an ethnic minority of Nepali-speaking Bhutanese who live in the south of the country. The regime’s justification was to preserve Bhutanese culture from any foreign influence, a policy of “One Nation One People.” By the mid-1990s, 107,000 refugees lived among seven U.N. camps in southeastern Nepal, about one-sixth of Bhutan's total population. After talks between Nepal and Bhutan failed to produce a resettlement agreement—Bhutan didn’t want the Lhotshampas back—Western countries agreed to take on the refugees.

So began what the U.N. has called one of the world’s largest resettlement efforts. The United States welcomed 60,000 refugees starting in 2008. Khem*, who was kicked out of Bhutan when he was 13, was one of them. After 17 years in a refugee camp, he now lives in Oakland, California, where he’s active in the refugee community. “Now we are very happy,” says Khem. “We can say that we are refugees from Bhutan… Now the government we see [in Bhutan] says there’s gross national happiness when one-sixth of people are away from the country.”

Many Bhutanese aren’t told the truth about what happened to the Lhotshampas and believe the government's false claim that only several thousand were expelled, but Khem says technology-savvy, educated people are aware of the problem. Khem questions the ability of Bhutanese people to truly speak their mind, to the press or to an outsider. “They don’t have freedom of speech there," he says. "They say they are happy, but democracy is not there.”

Needless to say, ethnic cleansing was not a topic raised in Harris' interviews, an omission that led one commenter on Brain Pickings, which featured the project, to write, “Seriously, this is obscene. Like a Nazi documentary about how happy Germany is without jews.” Even without the Holocaust comparison, this raises an important, largely overlooked conversation: Is it appropriate to focus on a nation's overall happiness when a huge percentage of that country’s population is prohibited from sharing in that happiness? If artists like Harris—who did not respond to an email asking him to comment on Bhutan's refugees—want to help us better understand isolated places that most of us will never visit, they have a responsibility to paint a complete picture. The “sad” story of Nepali-Bhutanese refugees is as much a part of the story of modern-day Bhutan as the “happy” story of the many people who live there. Where are the balloons for the Lhotshampas?

Bhutan’s holy mountain pass of Dochula towers in the clouds at 10,000 feet. At the end of his stay in Bhutan, Harris ascended the peak bearing 117 balloons, one for each of his interviewees' wishes. At sunset, Harris reinflated the balloons and hung them among the prayer flags. In a TED Talk released after he got back from Bhutan, he encouraged people to go visit the site, where the balloons continued to hang. He didn't mention the thousands of Bhutanese people who would never have the opportunity to experience something so beautiful in their homeland.

*Name changed to protect his identity.

Photos courtesy of Jonathan Harris.

Articles
via Real Time with Bill Maher / YouTube and The Late Late Show with James Corden / YouTube

A controversial editorial on America's obesity epidemic and healthcare by comedian Bill Maher on his HBO show "Real Time" inspired a thoughtful, and funny, response by James Cordon. It also made for a great debate about healthcare that Americans are avoiding.

At the end of the September 6th episode of "Real Time, " Maher turned to the camera for his usual editorial and discussed how obesity is a huge part of the healthcare debate that no one is having.

"At Next Thursday's debate, one of the candidates has to say, 'The problem with our healthcare system is Americans eat shit and too much of it.' All the candidates will mention their health plans but no one will bring up the key factor: the citizens don't lift a finger to help," Maher said sternly.

Keep Reading Show less
Politics

There is no shortage of proposals from the, um, what's the word for it… huge, group of Democratic presidential candidates this year. But one may stand out from the pack as being not just bold but also necessary; during a CNN town hall about climate change Andrew Yang proposed a "green amendment" to the constitution.

Keep Reading Show less
test
Me Too Kit

The creator of the Me Too kit — an at home rape kit that has yet to hit the market — has come under fire as sexual assault advocates argue the kit is dangerous and misleading for women.

The kit is marketed as "the first ever at home kit for commercial use," according to the company's website. "Your experience. Your kit. Your story. Your life. Your choice. Every survivor has a story, every survivor has a voice." Customers will soon be able order one of the DIY kits in order to collect evidence "within the confines of the survivor's chosen place of safety" after an assault.

"With MeToo Kit, we are able to collect DNA samples and other tissues, which upon testing can provide the necessary time-sensitive evidence required in a court of law to identify a sexual predator's involvement with sexual assault," according to the website.

Keep Reading Show less
Health

Villagers rejoice as they receive the first vaccines ever delivered via drone in the Congo

The area's topography makes transporting medicines a treacherous task.

Photo by Henry Sempangi Senyule

When we discuss barriers to healthcare in the developed world, affordability is commonly the biggest concern. But for some in the developing world, physical distance and topography can be the difference between life and death.

Widjifake, a hard-to-reach village in northwestern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) with a population of 6,500, struggles with having consistent access to healthcare supplies due to the Congo River and its winding tributaries.

It can take up to three hours for vehicles carrying supplies to reach the village.

Keep Reading Show less
Health
via Keith Boykin / Twitter

Fox News and President Trump seem like they may be headed for a breakup. "Fox is a lot different than it used to be," Trump told reporters in August after one of the network's polls found him trailing for Democrats in the 2020 election.

"There's something going on at Fox, I'll tell you right now. And I'm not happy with it," he continued.

Some Fox anchors have hit back at the president over his criticisms. "Well, first of all, Mr. President, we don't work for you," Neil Cavuto said on the air. "I don't work for you. My job is to cover you, not fawn over you or rip you, just report on you."

Keep Reading Show less
Politics