GOOD

Inside Trumpsingles.com, The Exclusive Dating Site For Donald Supporters

“I very much would like to meet a person with shared values”

A screenshot of Trumpsingles.com

It’s been quite some time since I last mulled over an About Me section, but Trumpsingles.com was forcing me to enter my personal tastes before logging in. I eventually landed on: “Lives for NFL Sundays. Loves going to the beach and long hikes. Hanging with my family. You know, the usual.” Yikes, I know. But I wasn’t really looking for true love when I joined the new dating site created for Donald Trump supporters. I just wanted to know what it was like inside.


A run-of-the-mill online dating network, Trumpsingles was created by David Goss, a 35-year-old associate producer of reality television from Santa Clarita, CA. After hearing stories of Trump supporters getting ditched on first dates, he built a dedicated social network where fans of the Republican nominee could meet each other and, ideally, find love. To date, 7,000 users are active on Trumpsingles—about 5,500 less than the trailblazing Berniesingles.com, Goss’ obvious inspiration which launched back in February, but the number is growing by the hour.

[quote position="full" is_quote="true"]I very much would like to meet a person with shared values.[/quote]

I asked one user, a Trump supporter from Florida named Patricia Passaretti, how she found the site and why she’s been active on it so far. She said joining up was a no-brainer after hearing about it on Fox & Friends last Thursday. “I have used other sites (eHarmony, Match, Plenty Of Fish) with no success,” she told me. “I very much would like to meet a person with shared values, and I firmly believe that our political beliefs exemplify our core values.”

Harry Reis, a professor of psychology at the University of Rochester who studies social interaction and relationships, has found that Passaretti’s view is common, but it’s one of many filters people use to find mates. “People filter out potential partners on all sorts of dimensions, like religion, hobbies, and whether they like to sleep late or rise early,” he said. “Political preferences are just another one. I don't think this is intended as a shortcut to intimacy—but even if it was, it certainly wouldn't create intimacy. It just rules out one potential source of conflict."

Given our current political climate, the possibility of your candidate of choice becoming a “source of conflict” while dating seems like an understatement. Goss, talking to the New York Post last week, said the need for Trumpsingles emerged from the stigma experienced by supporters due to the candidate’s divisive language and policies. But does the site actually do that?

After I entered the usual information—interests, body type, hair color, smoking and drinking preferences—I arrived at a barebones home page with 140 initial matches. The network’s featured choice for me, a 30-year-old in Brooklyn, was a 67-year-old woman from Wyoming, but I went through the entire list to see what kinds of users were active. Out of 140, I only received three people of color as matches. The age range skewed older, an issue experienced by both genders.

“I've had some communication with men, been hit on by two 60-something men who could be my father, and a couple of younger guys,” Passaretti told me. “I also had the usual jerk comment on a photo telling me to contact him if I want to see nude photos. I immediately reported him and they deactivated his account.”

[quote position="full" is_quote="true"]I had the usual jerk comment on a photo [...] telling me to contact him if I want to see nude photos.[/quote]

So, basically par for the course on any dating platform. “I think the concept is awesome, but the site needs to be tweaked a little and obviously needs to grow,” she added, praising the moderator’s quick response to her abuse complaint.

Trumpsingles uses an old-school model, favored by mid-aughts innovators like Nerve.com, where users purchase credits in order to contact potential mates. On enrolling, I was provided with six complementary tokens to get started. Each private message costs a credit. Saving to your “hot list” costs 25, which seems like a typo. (I asked, but didn’t receive comment from the site’s owners.) Ten credits sell for $2.99, yet 25 credits go for $12.99—some fuzzy math which needs clarification.

Either way, politics-driven dating sites are nothing new. Beyond the afformentioned Berniesingles, there’s LiberalHearts for other leftys. TheAtlasphere, an homage for Ayn Rand, joins LibertarianPassions on the anti-government front. The #NeverTrump movement will love ConservativeDates, which holds it down for more traditional right wingers.

A screenshot of Berniesingles.com

And while the old adage that opposites attract sounds nice, the research of Neil Malhotra, a professor of political economy in the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University, has found these political-leaning dating sites exist for a reason. “Political sorting is comparable in size to sorting based on education and race,” he told me. “Our findings suggest that shared political orientations signal shared values, which may be important in child rearing and general household harmony.”

It’s easy to scoff at Trumpsingles, to mock its inelegant design and odd logo (which I believe owes a lot to the covers of supermarket romance novels) or its nearly-witty slogan (“making dating great again”). But dating is hard enough. How could I begrudge a safe space for like-minded people to meet and explore their deeper chemistry? I certainly didn’t experience any hate while browsing around.

I do wonder, though, what does Trump think? The Republican nominee has yet to comment on the dating platform bearing his name. I’m betting he thinks it’ll be yuuuuge, just like everything else created in his image.

Articles
via Chela Horsdal / Twitter

Amazon's "The Man in the High Castle" debuted the first episode of its final season last week.

The show is loosely based on an alternative history novel by Philip K. Dick that postulates what would happen if Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan controlled the United States after being victorious in World War II.

Keep Reading Show less
Politics
via Mike Mozart / Flickr

Chick-fil-A is the third-largest fast food chain in America, behind McDonald's and Starbucks, raking in over $10 billion a year.

But for years, the company has faced boycotts for supporting anti-LGBT charities, including the Salvation Army, the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and the Paul Anderson Youth Home.

The Salvation Army faced criticism after a leader in the organization implied that gay people "deserve to die" and the company also came under fire after refusing to offer same-sex couples health insurance. But the organization swears it's evolving on such issues.

via Thomas Hawk / Flickr

The Fellowship of Christian Athletes explicitly announced it was anti gay marriage in a recent "Statement of Faith."

God instituted marriage between one man and one woman as the foundation of the family and the basic structure of human society. For this reason, we believe that marriage is exclusively the union of one man and one woman.

The Paul Anderson Youth Home teaches boys that homosexuality is wrong and that same-sex marriage is "rage against Jesus Christ and His values."

RELATED: The 1975's singer bravely kissed a man at a Dubai concert to protest anti-LGBT oppression

In 2012, Chick-fil-A's CEO, Dan Cathy, made anti same-sex marriage comments on a radio broadcast:

I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, "We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage". I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.

But the chicken giant has now decided to change it's says its charitable donation strategy because it's bad for business...Not because being homophobic is wrong.

The company recently lost several bids to provide concessions in U.S. airports. A pop-up shop in England was told it would not be renewed after eight days following LGBTQ protests.

Chick-fil-A also has plans to expand to Boston, Massachusetts where its mayor, Thomas Menino, pledged to ban the restaurant from the city.

via Wikimedia Commons

"There's no question we know that, as we go into new markets, we need to be clear about who we are," Chick-fil-A President and Chief Operating Officer Tim Tassopoulos told Bisnow. "There are lots of articles and newscasts about Chick-fil-A, and we thought we needed to be clear about our message."

RELATED: Alan Turing will appear on the 50-pound note nearly 70 years after being persecuted for his sexuality

Instead, the Chick-fil-A Foundation plans to give $9 million to organizations that support education and fight homelessness. Which is commendable regardless of the company's troubled past.

"If Chick-Fil-A is serious about their pledge to stop holding hands with divisive anti-LGBTQ activists, then further transparency is needed regarding their deep ties to organizations like Focus on the Family, which exist purely to harm LGBTQ people and families," Drew Anderson, GLAAD's director of campaigns and rapid response, said in a statement.

Chick-fil-A's decision to back down from contributing to anti-LGBT charities shows the power that people have to fight back against companies by hitting them where it really hurts — the pocket book.

The question remains: If you previously avoided Chick-fil-A because it supported anti-LGBT organizations, is it now OK to eat there? Especially when Popeye's chicken sandwich is so good people will kill for it?

Lifestyle

Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr and nrkbeta / flickr

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) dropped a bombshell on Tuesday, announcing it had over 900 emails that White House aide Stephen Miller sent to former Breitbart writer and editor Katie McHugh.

According to the SPLC, in the emails, Miller aggressively "promoted white nationalist literature, pushed racist immigration stories and obsessed over the loss of Confederate symbols after Dylann Roof's murderous rampage."

Keep Reading Show less
Politics
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less
Business