This week’s post is “Transparency: Who Has Given the Most to Haiti,”a collaboration between GOOD and Design Language. The post illustrates the disparities of donations that have come to fruition since the earthquake in Haiti.Representing the donated amount in millions from individual donors, NGOs, businesses and countries, the aesthetic result of the statistics proved controversial. Some comments voiced concerns about Canada’s represented donations at the time of posting. Others, like commenter dskimin, who wrote, “Really? Giselle gave more than Goldman Sachs and Citibank?” seemed more surprised by the visual.And there’s a fair bit to be surprised about; like Sandra Bullock and the Coca Cola Corporation donating the same amount. Or the fact that individual out-of-pocket donations soared well past those of major banks, countries, celebrities and aid relief organizations, second only to donations from the U.S.For more Transparency posts, check out: Transparency: State-by-state Abortion Rates, Transparency: Is New Airport Security Causing Flight Delays, Transparency: GOOD’s Most Popular Infographics of 2009For more posts on Haiti: Haiti: A Reading List, Somali Pirates: Down to Help Haiti, Picture Show: Haitian Earthquake Appeal
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

