Test Your Glucose Levels With Temporary Tattoos

Nanoresearchers have developed a wearable device that may allow diabetics to banish those awful finger-pricking monitors forever.

Photo courtesy the UC San Diego Jacobs School of Engineering.

Mere mention of “temporary tattoos” dredges up a certain nostalgia for most. There was a certain thrill in removing that damp washcloth after dabbing for 30 interminable seconds and carefully peeling back the paper to reveal a perfectly transferred tattoo (a glittering, technicolor Lisa Frank character, for me). There was also the stinging pain of having to scrub it off if your chosen area of application (usually my cheek or, just once, my forehead) wasn’t suitable for that day’s family function or piano recital.

At any rate, nanoresearchers at University of California, San Diego are now harnessing this childhood favorite in the name of medical advancement, developing a temporary tattoo that can measure a wearer’s glucose levels. This highly sensitive, easy to wear sensor is particularly encouraging for those afflicted with diabetes, who often have to check their glucose levels several times a day, usually by pricking a fingertip to nab a blood sample—a painful process which some diabetics prefer to avoid altogether, even in the face of potentially harmful repercussions. What’s more is that the tattoos are incredibly inexpensive, costing only around a few cents per device.

Developed and tested by graduate student Amay Bandodkar and a team of colleagues at the Jacobs School of Engineering’s Center for Wearable Sensors, the device, according to nano researchers, works like this: “A very mild electrical current applied to the skin for 10 minutes forces sodium ions in the fluid between skin cells to migrate toward the tattoo’s electrodes. These ions carry glucose molecules that are also found in the fluid. A sensor built into the tattoo then measures the strength of the electrical charge produced by the glucose to determine a person’s overall glucose levels.” Results published by the team in the Analytical Chemistry journal found that the device functioned just as well as a finger-stick monitor in detecting glucose levels in subjects.

While the device doesn’t currently provide the numerical readout necessary for wearers to check their own glucose levels, Bandodkar says it’s in development, and the hope is that the tattoo “will also eventually have Bluetooth capabilities to send this information directly to the patient’s doctor in real-time or store data in the cloud.” Additionally, if the device is used by large populations who suffer from diabetes, as they envision it could be, the team believes the data gathered by their temporary tattoos could prove useful in providing more insight into the causes and potential prevention of diabetes.

via David Leavitt / Twitter

Anyone who has ever worked in retail knows that the worst thing about the job, right after the pay, are the unreasonable cheapskates who "want to talk to your manager" to get some money off an item.

They think that throwing a tantrum will save them a few bucks and don't care if they completely embarrass themselves in the process. Sometimes that involves belittling the poor employee who's just trying to get through their day with an ounce of dignity.

Twitter is rallying around a gal named Tori who works at a Target in Massachusetts after she was tweet-shamed by irate chapekate, journalist, and Twitter troll, David Leavitt.

Keep Reading

Childbirth is the number one reason American women visit the hospital, and it ain't cheap. In fact, it's getting more and more expensive. A new study published in Health Affairs found that the cost of having a baby with employer-sponsored health insurance increased by almost 50% in the past seven years.

The study evaluated "trends in cost-sharing for maternity care for women with employer-based health insurance plans, before and after the Affordable Care Act," which was signed into law in 2010. The study looked at over 657,061 women enrolled in large employer-sponsored health insurance plans who delivered babies between 2008 and 2015, as these plans tend to cover more than plans purchased by small businesses or individuals.

Keep Reading

A meteorite crashed into Earth nearly 800,000 years ago. The meteor was 1.2 miles wide, and the impact was so big, it covered 10% of the planet with debris. However, scientists haven't been able to find the impact site for over a century. That is, until now. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal believes the crash site has been located.

Tektites, which are essentially rocks that have been liquefied from the heat of the impact and then cooled to form glass, help scientists spot the original impact site of a meteor. Upon impact, melted material is thrown into the atmosphere, then falls back to the ground. Even if the original crater has disappeared due to erosion or is hidden by a shift in tectonic plates, tektites give the spot away. Tektites between 750,000 to 35.5 million years old have been found in every continent except Antarctica.

Keep Reading