The Curious Rise Of Secret Facebook Groups

There’s the life we present on Facebook—then there’s the truth we tell in groups

Around this time last year, Adiba G., a 21-year-old Muslim-American based in California, felt like she’d run out of people to talk to. She wasn’t comfortable going to her parents about her problems with love or sex. And whenever she’d approached a counselor or therapist, the responses she received were toxic—even xenophobic.

[quote position="right" is_quote="true"]I just spilled my guts to you and this is all you got?[/quote]

“They'll be like, ‘Wellllll, it must be because your parents were arranged.’ Or just come out of nowhere with the mega-Orientalist shit, like, ‘It's probably because you're Muslim,’” she says. “I just spilled my guts to you and this is all you got?”

Adiba says that Arab and Arab-American women often have to deal with a “double stigma,” their behaviors unfairly judged first by their own communities, then the rest of American society. The latter, she says, has an “intense, exotifying fascination… with Middle Eastern women's experiences.” Whenever Adiba opened up about her personal narrative to outsiders, she felt she ran the risk that it would be used as fodder for someone’s anti-Arab agenda.

So with her friend Mariam, 25, Adiba founded Ishtar, a secret Facebook group and “sacred space” for Middle Eastern women in the United States. [All of the names and secret group titles in this article have been changed]. The two invited a select group of women they knew and trusted to talk about family disputes, mental health, and, as Mariam puts it, “things like sexual assault, relationships, queer sexualities, and being a sexual woman in a culture that’s told you that that’s the worst thing you can be.”

Ishtar is, for all intents and purposes, a “safe space”—a concept that in recent years has become a lightning rod for controversy. Free speech absolutists spit the phrase out with disdain, arguing that the call for safe spaces on university campuses and online platforms are examples of a politically correct culture gone awry. Political commentator Jonathan Chait and professional atheist Richard Dawkins are members of this cabal.

But what these critics fundamentally misunderstand about safe spaces is that they’re intended to be self-contained, entirely independent of the public sphere. The phrase was deployed as early as the 1960s to describe gay and lesbian bars, and in the 1970s to describe women’s “consciousness-raising groups.” These were domains where marginalized people could organize and connect with a community of their peers—people who’ve had similar experiences with homophobia or sexism.

Unfortunately, physical safe spaces are vulnerable to attack. Regulars at Pulse, the LGBTQ nightclub where 49 people were killed by a mass shooter, considered it to be a safe space for queer folks. And earlier this summer, a male professor at the University of Michigan-Flint sued the school over a women’s lounge that he argued violated the “civil rights” of men on campus; the private gathering area is set to be opened up to all students on campus.

In the face of this kind of hostility, more people like Mariam and Adiba are retreating to virtual spaces. Tumblr for many years served (and, for some, continues to serve) as a safe online harbor. The relative anonymity of the platform and the way it was structured—as a rolling, reverse chronological feed of text and image posts—encouraged confessional writing and emotional responses.

In 2012, as Tumblr was gaining a reputation as the premier virtual teen hangout, observers noted gravely that Facebook was becoming the domain of—gasp—old people. Parents were sending friend requests to their children. Grandparents were posting memes and commenting on their photos. In February of 2013, Blake Ross, Facebook’s director of product, resigned via a public goodbye letter echoing these concerns.

“I’m leaving because a Forbes writer asked his son’s best friend Todd if Facebook was still cool and the friend said no,” Ross wrote in a now-deleted post to his Facebook profile. A Pew Research Center poll released that same month suggested that even adults were tiring of the site.

Yet more than three years later, Facebook has surpassed Exxon in total market value, the fourth most valuable company in the world behind Apple, Google, and Microsoft. In January, the company announced that it had hit 1.59 billion users. According to CEO Mark Zuckerberg, 1 billion of them are active in Groups, a feature that was turned into a standalone app in 2014.

Facebook’s revised focus on Groups signals a recognition that users are migrating to the closed-off margins of their Facebook feeds, where they’re able to vent about daily trials and tribulations—an endeavor that’s become increasingly difficult on main profile pages. Ellis Hamburger of The Verge attributes this to the platform’s “friend problem”: A typical user’s vast network of friends includes coworkers, former pals from middle school, people encountered briefly at parties or conferences, and distant relatives.

If Facebook profiles have become our polished digital business cards, these discreet communities give us permission to get messy.

Mona, a 37-year old mother of three, started a Facebook group for Arab “mommies,” where she could feel comfortable talking openly about being a stay-at-home mom. “Within Arab communities, there's a facade that you have to portray outside of the house,” she says. “Inside of the house, it's a different situation. I think this group does give a little relief to that.”

Still, as closed-off online spaces increase in popularity, some are starting to feel less than safe. “I'm a part of a lot of different ‘secret’ Facebook groups,” says Hanna, a 24-year-old writer. “I have only one where I feel safe enough to share personal details, mostly because they're spaces where we have built up relationships of trust… You can't guarantee, no matter how curated your Facebook/Twitter is, that you won't get a man popping in and ruining shit.”

[quote position="right" is_quote="true"]You can't guarantee, no matter how curated your Facebook/Twitter is, that you won't get a man popping in and ruining shit.[/quote]

Mona counters that it's possible to regulate her group pretty tightly. Members aren’t allowed to discuss what happens within the group to non-members. “We do have a rule where you have to participate,” she says. Those who don’t are subject to being kicked out: If you’re not confessing, you have no personal stake in protecting the group’s security.

For a generation that came of age on Facebook, the assumption that everything posted to a Facebook page is public is one widely taken for granted. In the groups, however, it’s likely users won’t know every participant or member—or anyone at all. And that’s, in fact, one of the draws. “There are some people in groups in general who I've never met or spoken to one-on-one that know information about me people close to me don't even know,” says Hanna.

“It really is just a bunch of floating names in space,” adds Adiba. “What if you hate these people in real life? It doesn't fucking matter. Your personality stuff doesn't matter, because you’re doing this intense spiritual work together that's really liberating and beautiful.”

via Chela Horsdal / Twitter

Amazon's "The Man in the High Castle" debuted the first episode of its final season last week.

The show is loosely based on an alternative history novel by Philip K. Dick that postulates what would happen if Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan controlled the United States after being victorious in World War II.

Keep Reading Show less
via Mike Mozart / Flickr

Chick-fil-A is the third-largest fast food chain in America, behind McDonald's and Starbucks, raking in over $10 billion a year.

But for years, the company has faced boycotts for supporting anti-LGBT charities, including the Salvation Army, the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and the Paul Anderson Youth Home.

The Salvation Army faced criticism after a leader in the organization implied that gay people "deserve to die" and the company also came under fire after refusing to offer same-sex couples health insurance. But the organization swears it's evolving on such issues.

via Thomas Hawk / Flickr

The Fellowship of Christian Athletes explicitly announced it was anti gay marriage in a recent "Statement of Faith."

God instituted marriage between one man and one woman as the foundation of the family and the basic structure of human society. For this reason, we believe that marriage is exclusively the union of one man and one woman.

The Paul Anderson Youth Home teaches boys that homosexuality is wrong and that same-sex marriage is "rage against Jesus Christ and His values."

RELATED: The 1975's singer bravely kissed a man at a Dubai concert to protest anti-LGBT oppression

In 2012, Chick-fil-A's CEO, Dan Cathy, made anti same-sex marriage comments on a radio broadcast:

I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, "We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage". I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.

But the chicken giant has now decided to change it's says its charitable donation strategy because it's bad for business...Not because being homophobic is wrong.

The company recently lost several bids to provide concessions in U.S. airports. A pop-up shop in England was told it would not be renewed after eight days following LGBTQ protests.

Chick-fil-A also has plans to expand to Boston, Massachusetts where its mayor, Thomas Menino, pledged to ban the restaurant from the city.

via Wikimedia Commons

"There's no question we know that, as we go into new markets, we need to be clear about who we are," Chick-fil-A President and Chief Operating Officer Tim Tassopoulos told Bisnow. "There are lots of articles and newscasts about Chick-fil-A, and we thought we needed to be clear about our message."

RELATED: Alan Turing will appear on the 50-pound note nearly 70 years after being persecuted for his sexuality

Instead, the Chick-fil-A Foundation plans to give $9 million to organizations that support education and fight homelessness. Which is commendable regardless of the company's troubled past.

"If Chick-Fil-A is serious about their pledge to stop holding hands with divisive anti-LGBTQ activists, then further transparency is needed regarding their deep ties to organizations like Focus on the Family, which exist purely to harm LGBTQ people and families," Drew Anderson, GLAAD's director of campaigns and rapid response, said in a statement.

Chick-fil-A's decision to back down from contributing to anti-LGBT charities shows the power that people have to fight back against companies by hitting them where it really hurts — the pocket book.

The question remains: If you previously avoided Chick-fil-A because it supported anti-LGBT organizations, is it now OK to eat there? Especially when Popeye's chicken sandwich is so good people will kill for it?


Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr and nrkbeta / flickr

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) dropped a bombshell on Tuesday, announcing it had over 900 emails that White House aide Stephen Miller sent to former Breitbart writer and editor Katie McHugh.

According to the SPLC, in the emails, Miller aggressively "promoted white nationalist literature, pushed racist immigration stories and obsessed over the loss of Confederate symbols after Dylann Roof's murderous rampage."

Keep Reading Show less
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less