Damage Control: Why the Backlash Against the Komen Foundation Succeeded Why the Backlash Against the Susan G. Komen Foundation Succeeded

Why don't we put the same pressure on politicians as we did on Komen?

On Tuesday, the anti-breast cancer charity Susan G. Komen For The Cure announced it was pulling funds that it had previously provided Planned Parenthood for breast exams. And today, after a hailstorm of protest on Twitter, Facebook, and Susan G. Komen's message boards, the charity announced that it would be restoring Planned Parenthood's grants.

Folks across the Internet are attributing this victory to, well, the Internet. Yay, social media! But it's worth asking why this particular attack on women's health prompted such a deafening outcry. After all, just one year ago the House of Representatives voted to defund Planned Parenthood outright. Conservative legislators rail against the HPV vaccine, which also prevents women from getting life-threatening cancer. Neither case prompted a fraction of the ire. What exactly got us so riled up this time?

It's partly about the politics of breast cancer itself, or lack thereof. Breast cancer is one of the few nonpartisan women's health issues. For those of us irritated by Komen's pinkwashing or the foundation's petty lawsuits against smaller charities, this may have also been an opportunity to vent our disgust. Mainly, though, the difference lies in the money: We expect to have a say in where our donations go.

Technically, we should have the same passion about our tax dollars, but taxes are mandatory. We don't decide the amount we pay based how much we like the government. Donations and purchases are voluntary and deliberate, and we're confident that foundations and businesses are obligated to please their supporters. Even when individuals donate to campaigns, few actually believe that political leaders prioritize our interests.

Besides, the politicians who attack Planned Parenthood are likely not the ones women's health advocates voted for. Even if they are, voters have to wait for the next election cycle to exact revenge. When politicians do something that tick us off, we have a hard time harnessing the kind of public protest we've seen this week. Usually, we don't even try. Politicians, in turn, have noticed. Whereas Komen's image is everything, politicians assume that, unless you're giving millions, they can get away with almost anything.

The Komen Foundation's reversal is an undeniable victory. It's also a lesson. We may not have a choice about paying our taxes, but we still have a right to hold our legislators accountable for where that money goes. If we make them look as bad as we just made the Susan G. Komen Foundation, perhaps they'll even listen to us.

Photo (cc) via Flickr user pfala.

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading