I have not studied the complete history of famous rivers, but I think I can confidently say that the Los Angeles River is having a big month. In fact, it may be the river’s biggest month since February 1938, when, flood-fueled, it sloshed so far out of its banks that it busted down dams, destroyed thousands of houses, and killed around 100 people. Engineers at that time couldn’t handle the task of taming the beast in a way that could assure ecological conservation, so they controlled it the only way they knew how: Those lovely concrete channels that let the water slice through the city faster than a flushing toilet.


Because of this unfortunate oversight, the Army Corps of Engineers determined that the Los Angeles River was not made up of “traditionally navigable waters.” It is, by the way, technically navigable; many people have kayaked all 50 miles of it—including one Army Corps employee who lost her job. And not all of it is a concrete chute. But, deemed unnavigable, the river lost its shot at federal funding that could have helped to tidy it up, including dollars from the Clean Water Act.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC-nbwbqNY4

So that’s why July 7 was a really big day for the not-quite-river: Representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency stood on its banks and made a sweeping statement that reversed its previous decision. The Los Angeles River was once again a river.

A big reason that the EPA made that statement was because they plan to make an example of Los Angeles’s watershed. If they can revitalize our little cement chute, there’s great hope for everything from sustainably managing seasonal floods in urban areas to “daylighting” buried creeks which are buried below years of development. And it’s especially important that Los Angeles is in such a parched corner of the west, where access to water is a bigger concern for some people than money. We can be a model for making rivers run safely, cleanly, and beautifully through other metropolises.

Thus comes the Los Angeles River’s next big milestone: July 16.

On this day, I joined a dozen other people in jail. We were atop the blisteringly hot helipad for the Twin Towers containment facility, where the concrete seemed to simmer endlessly in all directions, then blur mirage-like into the distant concrete of the train yards, bus yards, scrap yards. Lewis MacAdams, who founded the Friends of the Los Angeles River 23 years ago, used to carry a fake L.A. Weekly press pass to gain access to this roof, which offers one of the only truly unimpeded views of the river and how it curves through downtown. He pointed out the various landmarks below, as well as an interesting detail: From here, you can actually see how Los Angeles is nestled in a very obvious river valley.

We stood here because it had the very best view of Piggyback Yard, a 125-acre site where shipping containers move from trains to trucks. It’s not used nearly as much as it used to be, and in a few years, it will be up for sale. The Friends of the LA River are planning on transforming it into the tongue-in-cheek Piggy Backyard, a park and mixed-use development which will offer the first truly revitalized and redeveloped portion of the river.

The most exciting part of the plans, which were revealed on that helipad, is that Piggy Backyard would actually be the age-old solution to managing those outrageous floods the 1930s engineers couldn’t envision. The plan would essentially turn Piggy Backyard into a mini-floodplain by either widening the river channel, or diverting a significant amount of water into wetlands. When large amounts of water came surging downstream, it would flow freely into the greenspace, perhaps rendering some of the park unusable, but actually allowing the water to sink down into the aquifer, instead of being pushed out to sea.

The team behind this plan is the PBy Collaborative Design Group, a collective made up of architects at Michael Maltzan Architecture, Perkins + Will, and Chee Salette Architecture Office, as well as Mia Lehrer, the landscape designer who was also part of 2005’s Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan (and judge of our recent school garden design contest). Lehrer noted that the groundbreaking for another park, Civic Park, was happening simultaneously, about a mile away. While parks are always welcome in downtown Los Angeles, it seemed ironic to be moving buildings around to make room for greenspace, when there was such an opportunity to naturalize our greatest resource just a few blocks away. “We need to focus on the river,” she says.

Thankfully, there’s even more attention being heaped upon the river (told you it was a good month). Two years ago the Community Redevelopment Agency revealed a proposal for a Cleantech Corridor, a massive plan to retrofit the city’s outdated manufacturing district for green industry and sustainable living, making one of the largest greentech districts in the country. This month, SCI-Arc and The Architect’s Newspaper announced the Cleantech Corridor & Green District Competition, where designers will communicate their visions for what this area should look like. As you can see from the map above, the corridor follows the river like a spine, meaning more architects, designers, and planners will be offering their ideas for how an urban river can interact with progressive businesses and residents.

And yes, there’s more. California’s High Speed Rail system—the impending train network linking the state’s major cities—is also intertwined with the river’s future. Piggy Backyard is walking distance from Union Station, where the city’s high-speed rail station will be constructed, and any routes in or out of that station must pass over (or under) the river channel. Once again, designers and architects are figuring prominently into that vision. RailLA, which we’ve written about here before, launched a call for ideas that will be featured in an upcoming exhibition, LA Beyond Cars: A Global Perspective on Rail and Public Space, which will open July 29 in the city. It’s impossible to envision the river without rail—namely because it’s a site so criss-crossed with train tracks—most of which will need to remain in place. But also because they both offer symbols of Los Angeles’s greener future.

In my time in Los Angeles I have found that there are two kinds of residents: Those of us who become fiercely protective of the river, and those of us who quite honestly don’t even know that it’s there. On that sweltering morning, standing on a prison, disoriented by my first true 360-degree view of my city, I admit it took me a few minutes to find it. But it was there, a strip of dark blue-green ribboning its way through the chalk-white channel. After seeing the plans for its future, and the designers who are so invested in them, in my mind, I was already swimming in it.

Renderings courtesy of PBy Collaborative Group

More for You

  • Indie coffee shops are meant to counter corporate behemoths like Starbucks – so why do they all look the same?
    Photo credit: stomy/iStock via Getty ImagesMany coffee shops today seem to be aesthetically divorced from time and place.

    Like many young, urban professionals, we run on coffee. We especially enjoy frequenting independently owned cafes that pride themselves on ethically sourced beverages, strong local ties and a hip aesthetic.

    They’re the kinds of places that sneer at the homogenization and predictability of Tim Hortons, Second Cup, Dunkin and Starbucks.

    But as public space and consumer culture researchers, we began noticing a pattern: While the invention of new, nondairy milks to mix into lattes continues to amaze us, many U.S. coffee shops seemed to share a similar aesthetic.

    What was up with all the exposed brick? Why did so many of the baristas look cooler than us, but also so similar to one another? And why did most menus appear on a chalkboard, as if we were still in kindergarten?

    Weren’t we supposed to be in one-of-a-kind, authentic settings that make us feel unique and, let’s admit it, slightly elevated?

    As it turns out, the visual patterns we noticed had never been backed up by research. So after a quick cortado, we set out to test our hunch that local coffee shops had adopted a uniform aesthetic.

    Measuring homogeneity

    We asked over 100 American and Canadian young professionals living in cities to share an interior image of their favorite independent coffee shop, describe why they liked the shop’s appearance, and document aspects of its interior design.

    They could select these interior design features from a list of 23 common elements that we had identified in a pilot study – brick walls, marble counters, indoor plants, local art, vintage furniture and even the look of the baristas. Respondents could also write down other details they noticed.

    The elements that they selected and wrote down showed a fascinating overlap.

    Baristas led the pack: Two-thirds of the participants’ favorite local coffee shops had staff with tattoos or piercings. Over half had baristas with beards. Well over half of the respondents noted that their favorite shop had chalkboards, reclaimed wood features, local art, milk foam designs on beverages, local event posters and exposed brick. A large share of the shops had vintage furniture, community message boards and free books available to patrons to read. One-third of the images had indoor plants, trees or greenery.

    Barista with a beard and tattooed hands pours boiling water over coffee grounds.
    Chances are your favorite local coffee shop has a barista with a beard and tattoos. Wera Rodsawang/Moment via Getty Images

    Next up, we challenged the participants to identify the city where these coffee shops were located.

    Using the images provided by the respondents from the initial survey, we asked 158 new and prior participants if they could match the location of the shops depicted in six photographs to Cincinnati, St. Louis or Toronto – cities chosen for their different architectural and aesthetic qualities.

    Not a single participant was able to correctly identify the correct city for all the photos.

    We gave respondents another chance by showing two pictures of coffee shops, one at a time. This time, the two shops were located in Chicago and San Francisco – again, places that pride themselves on their unique and recognizable design culture. They were now given the choice of these key cities to select from, as well as three wrong cities. Only 6% successfully located both coffee shops, and nearly 20% immediately gave up.

    As one participant conceded: “Honestly, these aesthetics are very transferable now … they were random guesses and they could have been in any of the cities mentioned.”

    In other words, independent coffee shops in North America have become so similar aesthetically that their location cannot be picked from a lineup. The purportedly unique and local feel of coffee shops has instead been homogenized into a singular, palatable, North American aesthetic.

    Ironically, these shops have narrowed their aesthetics like a de facto brand franchise – exactly like the chain stores that their patrons ostensibly reject.

    A young woman with dreadlocks pays for her coffee as a smiling young female barista with short hair holds out a card reader.
    Exposed brick, check. Plants, check. Chalkboard, check. Tara Moore/Digital Vision via Getty Images

    Computers and capital

    So why is this happening?

    New Yorker cultural critic Kyle Chayka has attributed aesthetic homogenization to popular social media platforms like Instagram. He calls it the “tyranny of the algorithm”: Social media algorithms promote the visuals that users are most likely to engage with. This, in turn, causes the same types of visuals to be liked and shared, since users encounter them more often. Because the algorithm sees they’re popular, it continues to promote them, in a self-reinforcing cycle. In turn, coffee shop owners also see these online images and try to replicate them in their own establishments.

    Artificial intelligence will likely accelerate the digital homogenization of visual culture, since AI models are trained on massive datasets that feature widely circulated images. Whether it’s popular fashion, architecture or interior design, idiosyncrasies are collapsing into a generic, hegemonic aesthetic – what scholars Roland Meyer and Jacob Birken call “platform realism.”

    Finance plays a role as well. With the average cost of starting a new coffee shop between US$80,000 and $300,000, and with only a small share of coffee shops expected to stay open beyond five years, banks are keen to reduce their risk. Many of them will therefore ask aspiring coffee shop owners to opt for cheaper interior design choices that appeal to the broadest customer base.

    The consumer also plays a role

    But patrons of hip coffee shops may also be to blame.

    Decades before the rise of social media, AI and financial risk management, scholars such as Sharon Zukin revealed how young urban professionals paradoxically embrace the homogenization of their environment in their quest for authenticity.

    Those exposed brick walls? Zukin already described how Manhattan real estate brokers had marketed them to gentrifying SoHo yuppies in the early 1980s.

    Like their predecessors, today’s hipsters, creative professionals and knowledge workers are essentially cultural and aesthetic consumers. Many of them crave visuals – from fashion to architecture – that are different enough to feel cool and authentic, yet safe enough to match their lifestyle and their social status. They want a tasty latte as much as a palatable interior to drink it in.

    Businesses and developers are eager to appeal to these upwardly mobile consumers. At the same time, they want to reach the biggest number of customers. So they tend to create repeatable, homogenized environments in what Zukin describes as a “symbolic economy.”

    In coffee shops, patrons want more than a good espresso. They want to immerse themselves in a “scene” that matches their lifestyle and aspirations. And the exposed brick and the vintage furniture do just that – even if they’ve been copy-and-pasted in cities, small and large, across the nation.

    As we chase authenticity, we may just be finding comfort in carefully curated conformity.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.

  • Overpackers love this simple ‘5-4-3-2-1’ packing rule that makes travel way easier
    Photo credit: CanvaAn obvious overpack for travel.
    ,

    Overpackers love this simple ‘5-4-3-2-1’ packing rule that makes travel way easier

    When it comes to travel, packing efficiently is a skill acquired through experience. Lifestyle and content creator Alison Lumbatis shares a helpful 5-4-3-2-1 method designed to take the stress out of packing for both seasoned travelers and first-timers. Trying to pack light while still remembering everything you need can feel a little daunting. A simple…

    When it comes to travel, packing efficiently is a skill acquired through experience. Lifestyle and content creator Alison Lumbatis shares a helpful 5-4-3-2-1 method designed to take the stress out of packing for both seasoned travelers and first-timers.

    Trying to pack light while still remembering everything you need can feel a little daunting. A simple trick is knowing exactly what’s necessary, making your bag lighter and more practical.

    Putting The ‘5-4-3-2-1 Packing Method’ Into Action

    In her trending TikTok post, Lumbatis shares a packing system she claims to be “as easy as it sounds.” Here are the basics of the 5-4-3-2-1 packing method:

    • 5 TOPS
    • 4 BOTTOMS
    • 3 SHOES
    • 2 LAYERS
    • 1 MISCELLANEOUS

    Lumbatis explains, “So all you got to do is pick out 5 tops, 4 coordinating bottoms, 3 pairs of shoes, 2 layering pieces, and 1 of anything else. Like a dress, pajamas, a hat, a belt, or any other accessories that you might need. And then of course pack as many undergarments and toiletries as you need.”

    The strategy isn’t just about simplifying and maximizing the number of items you bring on a trip. It’s also about function. “The key is to pick versatile pieces that can mix and match so you can pair them up for whatever activities you have planned for your trip.”

    minimalism, versatile pieces, functionality, packing
    Packing the necessary items
    Photo credit Canva

    Taking Pictures Can Help Plan Ahead

    Another helpful step is taking photos of your outfits to remember how everything fits together. Lumbatis offers, “You can even take pictures of the outfits with you wearing them or flat lays of the pieces and keep them on your phone or in your Notes App — So you can refer back to it on your trip.”

    Is the 5-4-3-2-1 packing method effective? These were some of the thoughts in the comments from readers hopeful to put the plan into action:

    “Great tip for me. Hate packing and never wear all the clothes I bring.”

    “Heading to Japan and I was just going to my closet to put it together. I overpack so this is sooo helpful.”

    “I’m dreading how to not over pack for such a variety of occasions, heat, and limited washing facilities. Ugh.”

    “I struggle with under packing so this is super helpful!”

    travel, adventure, alleviate stress, preparation
    Soaking up the adventure.
    Photo credit Canva

    The Science Behind Good Preparation

    Traveling is a great way to alleviate the stress and burdens of our daily lives. A 2025 study in Springer Nature Link showed travel helped people improve their long-term resilience by creating positive emotions while ecouraging self reflection. National Geographic found the benefits of travel begin even before the trip begins.

    However, preparation can have a powerful effect on the simple stresses a person might acquire during traveling. A 2025 study revealed that planning reduced anxiety and helped people prepare for delays or unexpected changes. Research in 2025 reported by AP News found that even making a simple checklist reduced anxiety and helped make for smoother trips.

    Lumbatis claims, “If you struggle with overpacking and want to create a great capsule wardrobe packing list, you’ve got to try this method.”

    People hope that traveling will relieve stress more than generate it. The 5-4-3-2-1 packing method offers a clear and simple way to pack just what you need. Careful preparation helps prevent last-minute chaos and produces a more enjoyable trip. Hopefully, this method can help you spend less time worrying and more time soaking in the adventure.

    Watch this YouTube video on incredible vacation destinations to inspire your next trip:

  • People are cheering woman’s refusal to accept the latest trend in hotel bathrooms
    Photo credit: @bring_back_doorsSadie has declared war on non-private hotel bathrooms.

    People are cheering woman’s refusal to accept the latest trend in hotel bathrooms

    “I HATE how hotels started thinking going to the bathroom is a shared experience.”

    It can be frustrating seeing change for change’s sake in the world. To be more specific, changes that are said to be done in the name of innovation and design, but are in truth ways for companies to save a buck.

    One example that is getting attention is the bathroom doors in hotels… or the lack thereof, actually. One TikToker has had enough and has taken it upon herself to save regular bathroom doors in hotels and to point out why open-space bathrooms and glass doors just don’t cut it.

    On her @bring_back_doors TikTok account, Sadie has a collection of videos highlighting the flaws in hotel bathroom designs, with the most prominent being the lack of a regular door to the bathroom. In one viral TikTok, Sadie discussed a hotel that reached out to her, explaining that they have “foggy” glass doors to their bathroom to provide privacy. She was quick to point out that it still doesn’t provide adequate privacy. “Yes you can see through these,” Sadie said, adding that “glass doors do not close properly.”


    The comments rallied behind Sadie’s bathroom-door crusade

    The commenters joined in with Sadie, demanding the return of solid, closing, and lockable doors to bathrooms in hotels:

    “I HATE how hotels started thinking going to the bathroom is a shared experience.”

    “I hate how you can’t turn the bathroom light on without disturbing the other person in the room.”

    “The foggy ones are almost worse, you just get a hazy fleshy silhouette hunched over on the crapper like some kind of sack of ham.”

    “I just don’t get it, NOBODY wants this, even couples. I won’t be more likely to book two separate rooms for me and my friend/sibling/parent, I’ll just book another hotel.”

    “Love this campaign, I do not want a romantic weekend listening to the other person poo.”


    A great way to save a buck—er, I mean, ‘create a modern look’

    As many commenters asked, why do hotels have glass doors — or, worse, no doors at all—in their bathrooms? Well, this has been a growing trend in modern hotels over the past decade as a means to create a sleek aesthetic and to allow glass partitions to bring more daylight into otherwise darker sections of the room.

    At least that’s what’s being promoted to the customer. In reality, skimping on solid doors for glass ones or none at all gives the illusion that the room is bigger than it is while requiring fewer building materials. It does bring in more daylight, but mostly with the hope that you’ll cut down on electricity use for lights in an otherwise enclosed space. These reasons are also why some hotels don’t have solid walls around their bathroom areas at all.

    TikTok · Bring Back Doors

    TikTok u00b7 Bring Back Doors www.tiktok.com


    Tired of the lack of privacy? Check out the database

    To combat this trend, Sadie has developed a database at bringbackdoors.com for her and her followers to report which hotels have true, solid, private bathrooms in their accommodations and which ones do not, so people can properly plan where to stay and have true privacy during their most vulnerable moments.

    “I get it, you can save on material costs and make the room feel bigger, but what about my dignity?,” Sadie wrote on her website. “I can’t save that, when you don’t include a bathroom door.”

    Over time, the hope is that sanity and dignity can be restored as hotels realize that their glass “features” don’t have any real benefit when they don’t allow basic privacy.

Explore More Design Stories

Design

Indie coffee shops are meant to counter corporate behemoths like Starbucks – so why do they all look the same?

Culture

Overpackers love this simple ‘5-4-3-2-1’ packing rule that makes travel way easier

Design

People are cheering woman’s refusal to accept the latest trend in hotel bathrooms

Design

MIT’s super-fast camera can capture light as it travels