Bobby Jindal has been keeping a relatively low profile since his goofy TV response to Obama in February. He’s back, but you’ll have to imagine his folksy cadence because this time he chose the medium of print. In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Jindal goes after Obama’s health care plan.He has three main complaints. First, he says that the promise that you can keep your private health care plan is empty because the reforms are designed to push people into the public option. He also worries about the expense of the plan. And lastly, he questions whether the government can provide quality health care:…the Democrats disingenuously argue their reforms will not diminish the quality of our health care even as government involvement in the delivery of that health care increases massively. For all of us who have seen the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s response to hurricanes, this contention is laughable on its face.The FEMA response was terrible, yes. Maybe Jindal and I can agree on this: if we try government health care let’s not put the horse show guy in charge this time.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

