China's Climate Commitments Maybe Not So Binding?

China's lauded commitment to subject its carbon cuts to the U.N. body might have been overblown.

Yesterday, Andrew wrote about a potentially huge development in the world of international climate negotiations. Reuters was reporting that China "offered to submit its carbon emissions targets to a binding U.N. resolution

Unfortunately, sources I'm talking to on the ground in Cancun are saying today that that story was way overblown, and that China's position hasn't really changed as much as its language has.

My successor as U.S. "tracker" in the Adopt a Negotiator project, Alex Stark, wrote this yesterday (emphasis mine):

The conference center is also abuzz about a Reuters article that broke this morning indicating that “China on Monday offered for the first time to submit its voluntary carbon emissions target to a binding U.N. resolution.” The article has Huang Huikang, the Chinese Foreign Ministry’s envoy for climate change talks, saying “we can create a resolution and that resolution can be binding on China.” Reactions on-the-ground are mixed: some analysts are describing the statements as a breakthrough, while rumors are circulating that the Chinese delegation has said that the Reuters article has overblown their position and that the statements only reflect their previously held positions. Nevertheless, both sides have made more explicit public statements than they ever have in the past.


Josh Wiese, the coordinator of the Adopt a Negotiator project, told me this morning "it was a miscommunication," and that apparently China was talking about having their cuts legally binding domestically, which isn't really a change in position."

I can't help but have a cynical take that Chinese officials knew exactly how this news would be received, and didn't want to be seen as the roadblock to progress two years in a row. (Last year, in the shakeout from Copenhagen, a heavy portion of the blame for the failed talks fell on China.) Regardless, the impact of the news has seemingly given the perpetually stalled UNFCCC talks something of a shot in the arm.

Photo credit: Amily Yang for Adopt a Negotiator

via National Nurses United/Twitter

An estimated eight million people in the U.S. have started a crowdfunding campaign to help pay for their own or a member of their household's healthcare costs, according to a survey released Wednesday.

The poll, which was conducted by the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago, also found that in addition to the millions who have launched crowdfunding efforts for themselves or a member of their household, at least 12 million more Americans have started crowdfunding efforts for someone else.

Keep Reading
via Library of Congress

In the months after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the military to move Japanese-Americans into internment camps to defend the West Coast from spies.

From 1942 to 1946, an estimated 120,000 Japanese Americans, of which a vast majority were second- and third-generation citizens, were taken from their homes and forced to live in camps surrounded by armed military and barbed wire.

After the war, the decision was seen as a cruel act of racist paranoia by the American government against its own citizens.

The internment caused most of the Japanese-Americans to lose their money and homes.

Keep Reading

Step by step. 8 million steps actually. That is how recent college graduate and 22-year-old Sam Bencheghib approached his historic run across the United States. That is also how he believes we can all individually and together make a big impact on ridding the world of plastic waste.

Keep Reading
The Planet