Kid Vs. Ferrari: Here’s How Much It Costs To Raise A Child In 2017

Financially, you’re better off getting that Ferrari

Image via Flickr/John Althouse Cohen

Planning on having a kid? If so, you may want to plan on going back to a college ramen diet as well. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the cost of raising a child from birth to the age of 17 now adds up to an average cost $233,610. That average spans a wide range of tax brackets and family structures, but the typical middle-income, married-couple family can expect to spend roughly $13,000 to $14,000 per year on “child-rearing expenses.” With its annual report, the USDA aims to help families with financial planning.

But how do those estimated expenses break down exactly? According to the report, parents can expect living expenses (i.e., rent) to take up a third of the cost of raising a child. Researchers came to this conclusion after calculating the average cost of adding an additional bedroom to a family’s living space. The department admits this estimate likely doesn’t reflect the real costs of moving, which vary widely depending on where you live. It’s worth noting, too, that the USDA based its most recent numbers on 2015 statistics. Average costs will almost certainly be higher for those planning to have a baby this year—especially in terms of housing costs.

[quote position="full" is_quote="true"]The fact that the USDA leaves college tuition out of its estimate creates an unrealistic portrait of the true cost of raising a child.[/quote]

For those living in an expensive city like Los Angeles, for example, these numbers seem laughably conservative. Anyone searching for an apartment in West Hollywood knows that moving from a one-bedroom to a two-bedroom can easily cost you an extra $1,000 in rent. That’s an added $12,000 right there to make room for baby, taking a massive chunk out of the nearly $14,000 the USDA expects you to spend per year on a child.

Using Baby Center’s Cost of Raising a Child Calculator—which adjusts estimates based on your location and income bracket—it costs more than half a million dollars to raise a child from birth until age 18 in the western region of the United States if you include college tuition. The fact that the USDA leaves college tuition out of its estimate creates an unrealistic portrait of the true cost of raising a child, considering it’s difficult enough to get a job with a college degree and near impossible without one. Taking into account current inflation rates, you can also expect the costs presented today to increase by the time your kid is ready to apply to college. According to The Wall Street Journal, it costs an average of $214,000 to raise a child born in 1990. However, since then, the cost of going to college has nearly tripled, something the parents of millennials likely didn’t anticipate.

[quote position="left" is_quote="true"]Educational institutions don’t recognize this 'cheaper by the dozen' effect.[/quote]

Leaving the cost of college out of its estimates is misleading, but the message used to end the USDA’s report is borderline dangerous. “There are significant economies of scale, with regards to children, sometimes referred to as the ‘cheaper by the dozen effect,’” says Dr. Mark Lino, an economist at the USDA's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. “As families increase in size, children may share a bedroom, clothing and toys can be reused, and food can be purchased in larger, more economical packages.” To suggest that it’s somehow cheaper to have multiple children belies the fact that educational institutions don’t recognize this “cheaper by the dozen” effect. As far as I know, colleges don’t operate like Costco. There are no “buy one, get one free” discounts for bachelor’s degrees.

Condoms, on the other hand, which do double duty by preventing the spread of STDs, cost $15 for a pack of 24. You don’t need to be a math whiz to know that costs far less than the roughly $1 million it will take to send five kids to college.

Photo by Josh Couch on Unsplash

Christopher Columbus, Alexander Hamilton, William Shakespeare, and Sir Walter Scott are getting company. Statues of the famous men are scattered across Central Park in New York City, along with 19 others. But they'll finally be joined by a few women.

Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Sojourner Truth are the subjects of a new statue that will be on display along The Mall, a walkway that runs through the park from 66th to 72nd street. It will be dedicated in August of next year, which is fittingly the 100-year anniversary of the 19th Amendment that granted women the right to vote.

Currently, just 3% of statues in New York City are dedicated to women. Out of 150 statues of historical figures across the city, only five statues are of historical women, including Joan of Arc, Golda Meir, Gertrude Stein, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Harriet Tubman.

Keep Reading Show less

It's easy to become calloused to everyday headlines with messages like, "the world is ending" and "everything is going extinct." They're so prevalent, in fact, that the severity of these statements has completely diminished to the point that no one pays them any attention. This environmental negativity (coined "eco-phobia") has led us to believe that all hope is lost for wildlife. But luckily, that isn't the case.

Historically, we have waited until something is near the complete point of collapse, then fought and clawed to bring the species numbers back up. But oftentimes we wait so long that it's too late. Creatures vanish from the Earth altogether. They go extinct. And even though I don't think for a single second that we should downplay the severity of extinction, if we can flip this on its head and show that every once in a while a species we have given up on is actually still out there, hanging on by a thread against all odds, that is a story that deserves to be told. A tragic story of loss becomes one about an animal that deserves a shot at preservation and a message of hope the world deserves to hear.

As a wildlife biologist and tracker who has dedicated his life to the pursuit of animals I believe have been wrongfully deemed extinct, I spend most of my time in super remote corners of the Earth, hoping to find some shred of evidence that these incredible creatures are still out there. And to be frank, I'm pretty damn good at it!

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

For more than 20 years. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) has served the citizens of Maine in the U.S. Senate. For most of that time, she has enjoyed a hard-fought reputation as a moderate Republican who methodically builds bridges and consensus in an era of political polarization. To millions of political observers, she exemplified the best of post-partisan leadership, finding a "third way" through the static of ideological tribalism.

However, all of that has changed since the election of Donald Trump in 2016. Voters in Maine, particularly those who lean left, have run out of patience with Collins and her seeming refusal to stand up to Trump. That frustration peaked with the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Keep Reading Show less
NHM Vienna/Hans Reschreiter

Wealth inequality has been a hot topic of discussion as of late, but it's something that's occurred all throughout history. Class structure is a complicated issue, especially when you consider that haves and have nots have been in existence for over 4,000 years.

A study published in Science took a look at over 100 late Neolithic and early Bronze Age skeletons found in a burial site in southern Germany. The study "shed light on the complexity of social status, inheritance rules, and mobility during the Bronze Age." Partly by looking at their teeth and the artifacts they were buried with, researchers were able to discover that wealth inequality existed almost 4,000 years ago. "Our results reveal that individual households lasting several generations consisted of a high-status core family and unrelated low-status individuals, a social organization accompanied by patrilocality and female exogamy, and the stability of this system over 700 years," the study said.

Keep Reading Show less
via / Flickr and Dimitri Rodriguez / Flickr

Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign looks to be getting a huge big shot in the arm after it's faced some difficulties over the past few weeks.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a leading voice in the Democratic parties progressive, Democratic Socialist wing, is expected to endorse Sanders' campaign at the "Bernie's Back" rally in Queens, New York this Saturday.

Fellow member of "the Squad," Ilhan Omar, endorsed him on Wednesday.

Keep Reading Show less