GOOD

Day 20: Avoid Wearing or Using Chemicals #30DaysofGOOD

For October's challenge, we're asking you to get healthy, from your feet to your teeth to your brain.


\n
Welcome to The GOOD 30-Day Challenge (#30DaysofGOOD). Each month, we challenge our community members to do something that will improve the world around us—and our own lives. The challenge for October? To get healthy. In an effort to help us all rise to the occasion, we're going to assign one small task every day. Each morning, we will post the challenge on GOOD.is and Twitter, along with a testimonial from someone on the GOOD team who's already completed it. We invite you to complete all 30 mini-challenges with us! Today, we challenge you to:

Avoid wearing or using chemicals.

Every day, I slather a ton of chemicals on my face and body. But until I was asked to reduce my chemical intake for a day for GOOD’s 30-day challenge, I had no idea just how central synthetic chemicals were to the products I use on the regular: Contact solution, toothpaste, shampoo, conditioner, face soap, body wash, shaving cream, moisturizer, deodorant, sunscreen, chapstick, lipstick, concealer, perfume, pomade, hair spray, sometimes nail polish, other times nail polish remover. I even ingest a ton of this stuff, including the lipstick that slowly disappears from my lips (presumably into my mouth), the preservatives in my breakfast cereal, and whatever Diet Coke is.

I wasn’t eager to give up all of this stuff—I need chemicals to protect me from the sun and keep me awake in the afternoon, after I ingest all of my lunch chemicals! But I could seriously cut down on my intake. I started by swapping my regular soap and shampoo for Dr. Bronner’s natural version, and my bright blue-and-white toothpaste for Tom’s (how is it that a more “natural” toothpaste makes your teeth feel so much more unnatural?). I successfully ditched all my other regular skin, beauty, wakefulness, and vision-enhancing chemical products. Then, lunch happened.

Is the mayonnaise in my apple and cranberry salad pumped full of chemicals? Are there chemicals in bread? Cheese? Isn’t water a chemical compound? What does “chemical” mean, anyway, and how do I identify it on the back of a box? The most difficult part of today’s challenge wasn’t going without hair spray—my hair is valiantly unpredictable for the cause!—but realizing that I have no idea exactly what I’m putting on my skin or in my stomach on any given day, and am unequipped to differentiate between the 20-letters-long chemical compounds listed on my shampoo bottle.

\n

-Amanda Hess

\n

Ready, set, go! Good luck completing today's challenge. Share your experience on Twitter, Tumblr, and Facebook by using the hashtag #30DaysofGOOD, or let us know how it went in the comments section below.

Tomorrow's challenge: Clean out your pantry.

Articles
Photo by Casey Horner on Unsplash

As world leaders meet to discuss new ways to tackle climate change at the U.N. Climate Action Summit, they might miss one very big part of healing nature – nature. In a new short film, youth climate change activist Greta Thunberg and George Monbiot, a writer for the Guardian, talked about how we need to use nature as a solution to climate change.

There's a huge push to curb emissions, but it's not the be all end all of handling climate change; we also need to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. While we don't have technology to do that for us, there is another solution. "There is a magic machine that sucks carbon out of the air, costs very little, and builds itself. It's called a tree," Monboit says in the film. Researchers found that we could get rid of two-thirds of the carbon dioxide that we've emitted during the industrial era just by growing trees. That amounts to 205 billion tons of carbon. Right now, deforestation of tropical forests is responsible for 20% of current greenhouse emissions.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Climate Action Tracker

In 2016, 196 countries signed the Paris Agreement, pledging to combat climate change by taking action to curb the increase in global temperatures. The Paris Agreement requires countries to report on their emissions and what steps they're taking to implement those plans. Now that the countries are coming together again for the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York City, it's worth taking a look at what kind of progress they've made.

The Climate Action Trackerkeeps tabs on what each country is doing to limit warming, and if they're meeting their self-set goals. Countries are graded based on whether or not their actions would help limit warming to 1.5 degrees C.

According to a recent article from National Geographic, The Gambia, Morocco, and India are at the head of the class. "Even though carbon emissions in The Gambia, Morocco, and India are expected to rise, they'll fall short of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius limit," the article reads. Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United States, on the other hand, get a big fat F. "Projected emissions in Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the United States are far greater than what it would take to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius."

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Screenshot via Sweden.se/Twitter (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less
Science

The disappearance of 40-year-old mortgage broker William Earl Moldt remained a mystery for 22 years because the technology used to find him hadn't been developed yet.

Moldt was reported missing on November 8, 1997. He had left a nightclub around 11 p.m. where he had been drinking. He wasn't known as a heavy drinker and witnesses at the bar said he didn't seem intoxicated when he left.

Keep Reading Show less
Communities