Ethical Style: Fashion Advice for the Socially Conscious

Introducing GOOD's new column on dressing ethically.

Every Thursday, your Ethical Style questions, answered.

Its reputation is shallow, but fashion’s influence runs deep. Americans have spent $250 billion on clothing and accessories each year since 2008. Today, the fashion industry employs 25 million people worldwide. My entire adult life, I’ve been one of them. But my immersion in the fashion industry has shed little light on the source of most of the clothing in my wardrobe. When it comes to consuming fashion ethically, I’m plucking blindly from the racks just like everyone else.

The fashion system is complex, and the clothing it churns out has economic, social, and environmental implications that reach far beyond our closets. As we consumers grow increasingly aware of our role in this system, we’re beginning to make fashion choices beyond style and fit—we want to know how our sweater’s production has impacted the environment, and whether the factory workers who made our shoes work decent hours. As a whole, the fashion industry has been slow to respond to these demands. But that's changing.

Buy-one-give-one initiatives like TOMS wed charity with footwear (even if they fail to fix the problems of factory-made shoes). On the runway, Stella McCartney is a forerunner of vegan fashion (at a price inaccessible to many). Environmental consciousness has inspired the use of organic cotton and low-impact dyes for the t-shirts in Alternative Apparel’s Alternative Earth line (which constitutes about a third of the company’s total output). Even big corporations like H&M have made moves toward integrating organic and recycled raw materials in their supply chains (even as their focus on throwaway fashion has cut a skirt’s lifespan to a matter of months). Companies like Nike have committed to airing internal audits of their factories to ensure safe working conditions, fair wages, and no child labor (Nike still calls its commitment to sustainability a “journey”).

Welcome to the thorny landscape of “ethical,” “sustainable,” “eco-friendly,” and “organic”-branded companies. Ethical terminology is highly marketable, but it’s hardly illuminating. With so many wide-ranging issues at hand, it’s virtually impossible to make an informed decision. At best, ethical labels indicate one fashion company’s adherence to a single issue—an emphasis on environmentally-friendly production processes, maybe, or else a commitment to buying fair trade. At worst, they’re nothing more than misleading greenwashing with little oversight. Consumers lack the industry know-how and supply-chain access to discern the difference.

What is ethical fashion, really? The truth is, even industry leaders don’t know. Two years ago, Financial Times fashion editor Vanessa Friedman interviewed a host of fashion designers about what constitutes sustainable fashion. After finding little consensus, she called for the creation of “some sort of public lexicon” to guide the way—a system for defining and substantiating the claims behind the labels.

In the United States, at least, such a lexicon remains elusive. But one U.K. nonprofit organization has posed a definition of “ethical fashion” that offers a few simple guidelines. The Ethical Fashion Forum calls it the “triple bottom line”—three pillars necessary to consider a business truly “sustainable.” They are:

  • Social: “Increasing the capacity and well-being of the people and communities behind fashion.”
  • Environmental: “Minimizing the environmental impact of all business operations, throughout the supply chain."
  • Commercial: “Without a robust financial business model, none of the above can be achieved… A sustainable approach includes quality products or services that meet market needs and demands and are fairly marketed.”
  • \n

In other words, a sustainable company must consider the people, the earth, and the bottom line—after all, if the clothes won’t sell, they won’t make our closets any more ethical. The EFF offers an array of information and help on establishing sustainable practices for fashion professionals.

That still leaves fashion consumers like us with little guidance and plenty of questions. In this column, I’ll tackle your ethical fashion queries in the hopes of demystifying supply chains, dissecting new trends, and highlighting the companies that are making the best efforts to do better. The concept of ethical fashion is still in the works, and that’s ok—actually, it’s exciting. We have to start somewhere. Today, we as consumers have a lot of power to affect change in the clothes we wear. So let’s start asking the real questions.

Got an ethical fashion quandary? Email Tabea at

via David Leavitt / Twitter

Anyone who has ever worked in retail knows that the worst thing about the job, right after the pay, are the unreasonable cheapskates who "want to talk to your manager" to get some money off an item.

They think that throwing a tantrum will save them a few bucks and don't care if they completely embarrass themselves in the process. Sometimes that involves belittling the poor employee who's just trying to get through their day with an ounce of dignity.

Twitter is rallying around a gal named Tori who works at a Target in Massachusetts after she was tweet-shamed by irate chapekate, journalist, and Twitter troll, David Leavitt.

Keep Reading

Childbirth is the number one reason American women visit the hospital, and it ain't cheap. In fact, it's getting more and more expensive. A new study published in Health Affairs found that the cost of having a baby with employer-sponsored health insurance increased by almost 50% in the past seven years.

The study evaluated "trends in cost-sharing for maternity care for women with employer-based health insurance plans, before and after the Affordable Care Act," which was signed into law in 2010. The study looked at over 657,061 women enrolled in large employer-sponsored health insurance plans who delivered babies between 2008 and 2015, as these plans tend to cover more than plans purchased by small businesses or individuals.

Keep Reading

A meteorite crashed into Earth nearly 800,000 years ago. The meteor was 1.2 miles wide, and the impact was so big, it covered 10% of the planet with debris. However, scientists haven't been able to find the impact site for over a century. That is, until now. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal believes the crash site has been located.

Tektites, which are essentially rocks that have been liquefied from the heat of the impact and then cooled to form glass, help scientists spot the original impact site of a meteor. Upon impact, melted material is thrown into the atmosphere, then falls back to the ground. Even if the original crater has disappeared due to erosion or is hidden by a shift in tectonic plates, tektites give the spot away. Tektites between 750,000 to 35.5 million years old have been found in every continent except Antarctica.

Keep Reading
The Planet