As an addendum to my more vitriolic post below, here is a collection of links from today and yesterday from the left and right to help expand your thinking on the current conflict:Time magazine on why Israel’s offensive wont workJonah Goldberg, preempting Goodwin’s Law, on whether Nazi comparisons are valid.From Slate, Christopher Hitchens on Palestine’s failed promise.From pro-Israel (but anti AIPAC) lobby group J-Street, on why they support a cease fire. From the NYT, election flash point Rashid Khalidi on what you need to know about Gaza.From Fox News, a Gazan reporter describes the carnage.What are some of the best things you’ve read about the conflict? Post them in the comments and we’ll add them to this post. UPDATE:From the comments:From the Times, a visual timeline of Gaza, Hamas, and Israel. The U.S Senate passes a resolution supporting the incursion. The Economist on rights and wrongs in Gaza.Another, older Times op-ed on what, exactly, Israel is so scared of. Photo via NYT
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

