Georgetown University Takes Major Step To Atone For Its Slave-Owning History

To pay off its debts, the priests who ran the school sold 272 slaves in 1838

Patricia Bayonne-Johnson holds a photo of her great-grandparents and their son. The retired science teacher discovered that some of her ancestors were sold by the Jesuits of the Maryland Province in 1838, to pay off Georgetown University's massive debt.

On Thursday, Georgetown University announced a broad plan to right at least some of the wrongs perpetuated by its slave-owning history. Nearly two centuries have passed since the university benefited from the sale of nearly 300 slaves, The New York Times reports, and now administrators plan to incorporate preferential admission treatment for those whose ancestors were enslaved.

To get the process started, Georgetown president John J. DeGioia made a formal apology over the course of his speech on Thursday while also outlining the reparative measures he plans to enforce. Among those measures will be an institute devoted to the study of slavery as well as a public memorial honoring the slaves who literally built the institution and were sold to keep the school running in the early 1800s. One campus building will be renamed after an African-American slave while another will take the name of a black teacher.

These provisions go far beyond what most universities offer the descendants of slaves who built their schools. While Brown, Harvard, the University of Virginia, and a handful of other colleges have acknowledged their slave-owning pasts, none have provided preferential treatment in the admissions process, say historians Craig Steven Wilder and Alfred L. Brophy.

Though today’s steps forward may be unparalleled, the children and grandchildren of Georgetown alumni have enjoyed the priority admissions for decades. This isn’t a level playing field—it’s the bare minimum. (Even if some people think the school has already gone too far).

Universities are expected to lead cultural shifts toward progressive and inclusive platforms, so much more needs to be done. Georgetown made a modern equivalent of $3.3 million dollars after the 1838 sale of its slaves. Is it really that much to ask to put at least some of that money back into educating and uplifting deserving black students?

For a college that charges its students an average of $50,000 a year for tuition, I think not—and neither does The New York Times. In April, the editorial board stated:

“Georgetown is morally obligated to adopt restorative measures, which should clearly include a scholarship fund for the descendants of those who were sold to save the institution.”

A working group has released a report advising the university on its plan to engage and reconcile with descendants of slaves. For more about the school’s history of slavery, you can review a repository of letters, photos, and more at the Georgetown Slavery Archive.

via Real Time with Bill Maher / YouTube and The Late Late Show with James Corden / YouTube

A controversial editorial on America's obesity epidemic and healthcare by comedian Bill Maher on his HBO show "Real Time" inspired a thoughtful, and funny, response by James Cordon. It also made for a great debate about healthcare that Americans are avoiding.

At the end of the September 6th episode of "Real Time, " Maher turned to the camera for his usual editorial and discussed how obesity is a huge part of the healthcare debate that no one is having.

"At Next Thursday's debate, one of the candidates has to say, 'The problem with our healthcare system is Americans eat shit and too much of it.' All the candidates will mention their health plans but no one will bring up the key factor: the citizens don't lift a finger to help," Maher said sternly.

Keep Reading Show less

There is no shortage of proposals from the, um, what's the word for it… huge, group of Democratic presidential candidates this year. But one may stand out from the pack as being not just bold but also necessary; during a CNN town hall about climate change Andrew Yang proposed a "green amendment" to the constitution.

Keep Reading Show less
Me Too Kit

The creator of the Me Too kit — an at home rape kit that has yet to hit the market — has come under fire as sexual assault advocates argue the kit is dangerous and misleading for women.

The kit is marketed as "the first ever at home kit for commercial use," according to the company's website. "Your experience. Your kit. Your story. Your life. Your choice. Every survivor has a story, every survivor has a voice." Customers will soon be able order one of the DIY kits in order to collect evidence "within the confines of the survivor's chosen place of safety" after an assault.

"With MeToo Kit, we are able to collect DNA samples and other tissues, which upon testing can provide the necessary time-sensitive evidence required in a court of law to identify a sexual predator's involvement with sexual assault," according to the website.

Keep Reading Show less

Villagers rejoice as they receive the first vaccines ever delivered via drone in the Congo

The area's topography makes transporting medicines a treacherous task.

Photo by Henry Sempangi Senyule

When we discuss barriers to healthcare in the developed world, affordability is commonly the biggest concern. But for some in the developing world, physical distance and topography can be the difference between life and death.

Widjifake, a hard-to-reach village in northwestern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) with a population of 6,500, struggles with having consistent access to healthcare supplies due to the Congo River and its winding tributaries.

It can take up to three hours for vehicles carrying supplies to reach the village.

Keep Reading Show less
via Keith Boykin / Twitter

Fox News and President Trump seem like they may be headed for a breakup. "Fox is a lot different than it used to be," Trump told reporters in August after one of the network's polls found him trailing for Democrats in the 2020 election.

"There's something going on at Fox, I'll tell you right now. And I'm not happy with it," he continued.

Some Fox anchors have hit back at the president over his criticisms. "Well, first of all, Mr. President, we don't work for you," Neil Cavuto said on the air. "I don't work for you. My job is to cover you, not fawn over you or rip you, just report on you."

Keep Reading Show less