GOOD

Harambe Isn’t The Perfect Meme—It’s A Racist One

The internet joke capitalizes on a history of using gorillas as avatars for black people

Last week, The Atlantic ran a piece titled, “How Harambe Became the Perfect Meme.” The subtitle read: “The slain gorilla signifies nothing — except maybe our increasingly weird post-everything world.” But it doesn’t take much reflection to realize that what the gorilla and the jokes surrounding his death signify is much pernicious. Nowhere in The Atlantic article is race even invoked to explain the meme’s staying power.


Living on the internet as a black person can be difficult—to put things mildly. Online, as in the real world, whiteness is seen as the default. And anything or anyone on the “wrong” side of that description can find themselves marginalized and othered, or worse, threatened and attacked. In a society where too many of us only look for racism at surface level, searching out the most egregious ghosts in white hoods or the codified vileness of a supposedly bygone era. If no evidence of racism is found skimming the top layer of our collective or individual experiences, the common assessment is that there is nothing to fear and nothing to worry about. The internet is not exempt from this dynamic.

When video of a small boy falling into the gorilla enclosure at the Cincinnati Zoo hit news feeds in May, it seemed just another instance of the harrowing weirdness of our world. In the days following the incident, the boy and his family, who are black, became the targets of online vitriol that became increasingly radicalized. Media outlets looked into the father’s criminal record, much in the same way they do when a black person is killed by police. Protesters were picketing the zoo, launching petitions and calling for justice for Harambe, demonstrating an anger that was not present for the lives of black people killed by police.

After those chanting “All Lives Matter” grew tired of shaming the boy’s parents, memes and “tributes” to the gorilla flooded every corner of the internet, in every configuration imaginable. “Bush Did Harambe” joked one popular meme. The rapper Young Thug even titled one of the songs on his latest album “Harambe.”

Harambe is not the first example of an internet joke that functions to debase black people by comparing them to apes. In 2015, a so-called “sexy” gorilla in Japan went viral, many of the resulting memes were steeped in the racist tradition of objectifying black men. There was an implicit insinuation that he was like the hulking black male of white imagination coming to conquer all the helpless, impossibly submissive women of Japan. In July, Ghostbusters star and comedian Leslie Jones was compared to a gorilla and an ape by an army of racist Breitbart trolls. Like all racist tropes, this one has meandered through the muck of our consciousness, a serpent taking on a new form.

Those who claim to eulogize Harambe are, more often than not, doing so in a tongue-in-cheek manner that mocks what he represents in our collective consciousness. “Harambe is the message that became a medium, capable of carrying any signal, without becoming identified with any of them,” wrote The Atlantic. But this argument ignores the cultural context in which Harambe became a meme in the first place. From King Kong to the exhibition of black children in human zoos in the 20th century, there is a precedent for understanding the joke as an extension of a racist history that diminishes black life.

As The Atlantic astutely points out of Richard Dawkins’ original meaning of a meme:

“Richard Dawkins: a cultural signifier that spreads simply because it is good at spreading. It is neither worth spreading the way a TED talk aspires to be, nor particularly worth resisting. It spreads because it can.”

It seems too much to ask white folks cloaked in the abyssal secrecy of the internet to show a similar decorum and respect in grieving the death of a black man, woman or child. I can’t, however, accept that it’s mere coincidence—or a result of internet “weirdness” as The Atlantic argues—that this incident more than many others before it has proliferated as it has. There was a time when I would fight tooth and nail to beat back this perception of black people as akin to animals such as Harambe. I know better now, how white people view us has nothing to do with us and everything to do with them.

Earlier this month, a letter by UMass resident assistants allegedly banning Harambe jokes because they were “microaggressions” made news, angering many critics of “PC culture.” These people interject, loudly and repeatedly, that the world’s gone soft. But the truth is, we’re just tired of your shit and not down for taking it anymore. If you’ve never had to deal with white people as someone who is not white, it’s likely that you don’t see what the big deal is.

Those scratching their heads at the UMass notice may not see the harm in all this. They may also not know what it feels like to see, as I did, a fellow black classmate called “GO-RILLA” instead of his real name for an entire school year. This same university dealt with a scandal after a student wrote the n-word on a black student’s dorm room door only two years ago.

The “Perfect Meme,” borne of the death of a gorilla unfortunate enough to find himself in a zoo, is a statement on our current moment, the mob mentality, the absurdist levity and the reflexive denial when faced with uncomfortable truths that can make modern life—online and off—incredibly frustrating. In the past month, the jokes have grown tiresome. But putting a finger on why they wear me out, and being able to move past them, helps me make sense of my experience as a black person on the internet.

Articles
via Chela Horsdal / Twitter

Amazon's "The Man in the High Castle" debuted the first episode of its final season last week.

The show is loosely based on an alternative history novel by Philip K. Dick that postulates what would happen if Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan controlled the United States after being victorious in World War II.

Keep Reading Show less
Politics
via Mike Mozart / Flickr

Chick-fil-A is the third-largest fast food chain in America, behind McDonald's and Starbucks, raking in over $10 billion a year.

But for years, the company has faced boycotts for supporting anti-LGBT charities, including the Salvation Army, the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and the Paul Anderson Youth Home.

The Salvation Army faced criticism after a leader in the organization implied that gay people "deserve to die" and the company also came under fire after refusing to offer same-sex couples health insurance. But the organization swears it's evolving on such issues.

via Thomas Hawk / Flickr

The Fellowship of Christian Athletes explicitly announced it was anti gay marriage in a recent "Statement of Faith."

God instituted marriage between one man and one woman as the foundation of the family and the basic structure of human society. For this reason, we believe that marriage is exclusively the union of one man and one woman.

The Paul Anderson Youth Home teaches boys that homosexuality is wrong and that same-sex marriage is "rage against Jesus Christ and His values."

RELATED: The 1975's singer bravely kissed a man at a Dubai concert to protest anti-LGBT oppression

In 2012, Chick-fil-A's CEO, Dan Cathy, made anti same-sex marriage comments on a radio broadcast:

I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, "We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage". I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.

But the chicken giant has now decided to change it's says its charitable donation strategy because it's bad for business...Not because being homophobic is wrong.

The company recently lost several bids to provide concessions in U.S. airports. A pop-up shop in England was told it would not be renewed after eight days following LGBTQ protests.

Chick-fil-A also has plans to expand to Boston, Massachusetts where its mayor, Thomas Menino, pledged to ban the restaurant from the city.

via Wikimedia Commons

"There's no question we know that, as we go into new markets, we need to be clear about who we are," Chick-fil-A President and Chief Operating Officer Tim Tassopoulos told Bisnow. "There are lots of articles and newscasts about Chick-fil-A, and we thought we needed to be clear about our message."

RELATED: Alan Turing will appear on the 50-pound note nearly 70 years after being persecuted for his sexuality

Instead, the Chick-fil-A Foundation plans to give $9 million to organizations that support education and fight homelessness. Which is commendable regardless of the company's troubled past.

"If Chick-Fil-A is serious about their pledge to stop holding hands with divisive anti-LGBTQ activists, then further transparency is needed regarding their deep ties to organizations like Focus on the Family, which exist purely to harm LGBTQ people and families," Drew Anderson, GLAAD's director of campaigns and rapid response, said in a statement.

Chick-fil-A's decision to back down from contributing to anti-LGBT charities shows the power that people have to fight back against companies by hitting them where it really hurts — the pocket book.

The question remains: If you previously avoided Chick-fil-A because it supported anti-LGBT organizations, is it now OK to eat there? Especially when Popeye's chicken sandwich is so good people will kill for it?

Lifestyle

Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr and nrkbeta / flickr

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) dropped a bombshell on Tuesday, announcing it had over 900 emails that White House aide Stephen Miller sent to former Breitbart writer and editor Katie McHugh.

According to the SPLC, in the emails, Miller aggressively "promoted white nationalist literature, pushed racist immigration stories and obsessed over the loss of Confederate symbols after Dylann Roof's murderous rampage."

Keep Reading Show less
Politics
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less
Business