GOOD

“Let’s not Rumsfeld Afghanistan”

The birth of another political eponym As we know, There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know There are known...



The birth of another political eponym


As we know,
There are known knowns.
There are things we know we know.
We also know
There are known unknowns.
That is to say
We know there are some things
We do not know.
But there are also unknown unknowns.
The ones we don't know we don't know.

-Donald Rumsfeld (linebreaks by Hart Seely, editor of Pieces of Intelligence: The Existential Poetry of Donald H. Rumsfeld)

No it's not National Poetry Month (that's April), and Donald Rumsfeld hasn't gone the way of Michael Jackson and Farrah Fawcett. The former Secretary of Defense is on the mind of word nerds like myself for a different and far more amusing reason: his name has become, at least briefly, an eponym-one of those words that started as a name. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina got creative on "Face the Nation", saying
The political poetry of Graham's coinage is even more delicious than Rumsfeld's own verse: to Rumsfeld Afghanistan is vivid and clear. It expresses an important worry in a concise fashion-all Strunk and White-huggers should love it. But how did Donald Rumsfeld get to be known as the chief cheapskate of 21st century war?

The poor planning and general shoddiness of the early years of the Iraq war are the main reasons, plus Rumsfeld's own oft-quoted words, "You go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time." The fact that such lame reasoning came in response to soldiers complaining about lack of equipment and protection only made things worse for Rummy, who became the poster child for a quagmire, until his resignation in 2006.

Politics has been a major contributor of eponyms, as my fellow American Dialect Society members (especially Joel S. Berson, Laurence Horn, Steve Kleinedler, Clai Rice, Dave Wilton, Ben Zimmer, and Arnold Zwicky) reminded me this week. Pander-perhaps the ultimate political word these days-is derived from the name Pandarus, who the Oxford English Dictionary describes as "a Trojan archer who is said to have procured for Troilus the love and good graces of Chryseis." A more contemporary example-the Paul Simon song "A Simple Desultory Philippic (or How I Was Robert McNamara'd into Submission)"-is eerily reminiscent of Rumsfeld. The OED recently added entries for Presidential words Bushism, Bushian, Bushist, Clintonesque, and Clintonista. Clintonian was already included, but it was coined originally for George Clinton-the vice-president, not the legendary funkster.

For some reason, Supreme Court nominees have been prone to eponymization, maybe due to the length and drama of the pre-appointment hearings. The most notable was Bork, a term that still gets used, as in a recent Savannah Morning News editorial: "The public is ill-served when qualified nominees get ‘Borked'-a term that originated when Democratic senators savaged Reagan nominee Judge Robert Bork and set the stage for future partisan ugliness." Other terms such as Miered and Soutered have appeared, though they don't seem to have caught on. Bork probably had two advantages in becoming a successful word: it immortalized a memorable political smackdown, and the word bork is vivid and punchy. Hell, it's a four-letter word, and we all know how much better people feel after saying them. Given the relative uneventfulness of the Sonia Sotomayor hearings and the length of her name, I doubt we'll be hearing about much Sotomayoring in the latest blogs and tweets, but that term has been coined too.

There's no way of knowing if Rumsfeld will last long beyond this column: it could probably use our help. Consider the possibilities:

If your spouse-who is known for bungling home repair-proclaims a new mission to renovate the gazebo, you could say, "Honey, please don't pull another Rumsfeld on this family."

The word could be used to call out various tightwads, misers, skinflints, and lousy tippers: "Never eat out with Steve. He's a real Rumsfelder."

When your NBA team is dumping players and salaries just to avoid the luxury tax, say, "Hey! You can't win a championship by Rumsfelding."

The word could even be used in positive ways: "Guess what, kids? We saved enough to buy a boat! No more Rumsfelding."

Articles
Julian Meehan

Young leaders from around the world are gathering at the United Nations Headquarters in New York Saturday to address arguably the most urgent issue of our time. The Youth Climate Summit comes on the heels of an international strike spearheaded by Greta Thunberg, the 16-year-old climate activist from Sweden, who arrived in New York via emissions-free sailboat earlier this month.

Translated from Swedish, "berg" means "mountain," so it may feel fated that a young woman with Viking blood in her veins and summit in her name would be at the helm. But let's go out on a limb and presume Thunberg, in keeping with most activists, would chafe at the notion of pre-ordained "destiny," and rightly so. Destiny is passive — it happens to you. It's also egomaniacal. Change, on the other hand, is active; you have to fight. And it is humble. "We need to get angry and understand what is at stake," Thunberg declared. "And then we need to transform that anger into action."

This new generation of activists' most pernicious enemy is denial. The people in charge — complacent politicians and corporation heads who grossly benefit from maintaining the status quo — are buffered from real-life consequences of climate change. But millions of people don't share that privilege. For them, climate change isn't an abstract concept, but a daily state of emergency, whether it comes in the form of "prolonged drought in sub-Saharan Africa…devastating tropical storms sweeping across Southeast Asia, the Caribbean and the Pacific…[or] heatwaves and wildfires," as Amnesty International reportsare all too real problems people are facing on a regular basis.

RELATED: Greta Thunberg urges people to turn to nature to combat climate change

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

Millions of people in over 150 countries across the globe marched for lawmakers and corporations to take action to help stop climate change on Friday, September 20.

The Climate Strikes were organized by children around the world as an extension of the of the "Fridays for Future" campaign. Students have been walking out of classrooms on Fridays to speak out about political inaction surrounding the climate crisis.

"We need to act right now to stop burning fossil fuels and ensure a rapid energy revolution with equity, reparations and climate justice at its heart," organizers say.

There's no doubt the visual images from the marches send a powerful message to those on the ground but especially those watching from around the world. GOOD's own Gabriel Reilich was on the scene for the largest of the Climate Strikes. Here are 18 of the best signs from the Climate Strike march in New York City.

Keep Reading Show less

September 20th marks the beginning of a pivotal push for the future of our planet. The Global Climate Strike will set the stage for the United Nations Climate Action Summit, where more than 60 nations are expected to build upon their commitment to 2015's Paris Agreement for combating climate change.

Millions of people are expected to take part in an estimated 4,000 events across 130 countries.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Apple

When the iPhone 11 debuted on September 10, it was met with less enthusiasm than the usual iPhone release. A lot of techies are holding off purchasing the latest gadget until Apple releases a phone with 5G technology.

Major US phone carriers have yet to build out the infrastructure necessary to provide a consistent 5G experience, so Apple didn't feel it necessary to integrate the technology into its latest iPhone.

A dramatic new feature on the iPhone 11 Pro is its three camera lenses. The three lenses give users the the original wide, plus ultrawide and telephoto options.

Keep Reading Show less
Health
via I love butter / Flickr

We often dismiss our dreams as nonsensical dispatches from the mind while we're deep asleep. But recent research proves that our dreams can definitely affect our waking lives.

People often dream about their significant others and studies show it actually affects how we behave towads them the next day.

"A lot of people don't pay attention to their dreams and are unaware of the impact they have on their state of mind," said Dylan Selterman, psychology lecturer at the University of Maryland, says according to The Huffington Post. "Now we have evidence that there is this association."

Keep Reading Show less
Health