Lil' Kim's Radically Surgery-Altered New Look Sparks Heated Debate

Serious conversation fodder or much ado about nothing?

After posting photos of herself last Sunday on Instagram, Lil’ Kim has ignited a firestorm of controversy over her radically new look. The multi-platinum rapper, 41, is no stranger to physical reinvention, but her latest appearance has sparked heated conversations in regards to race, identity and self-image. Assuming that the photos are real (some are wondering if they’re fake), the most controversial aspect of her transformation is that she appears to have dyed her skin a paler color. Reactions online have spanned the spectrum from compassionate and supportive to mean and, yes, racist. In an article about the performer’s surgery, The Daily Dot points to an insightful interview in Newsweek from the year 2000 in which she discusses her feelings about her looks:

“All my life men have told me I wasn't pretty enough—even the men I was dating. And I'd be like, ‘Well, why are you with me, then?’ It's always been men putting me down, just like my dad. To this day, when someone says I'm cute, I can't see it. I don't see it no matter what anybody says.”

Her new look:

Lil’ Kim in 2007:

Photo credit:

Online reactions:

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading