GOOD

Kim Kardashian Defends Herself Against ‘Body-Shamers’

And we defend her.

The mirror selfie in question.

It’s a tale as old as time: Woman posts naked selfie online, selfie incites controversy, tweets are dispatched, a blog is published—this is the way we live now, in a news cycle dominated by celebrity tweets and viral Instagram photos. This is why, when Kim Kardashian posted a naked selfie to Twitter last night, it not only became a Twitter trending topic, but a byline for every pop culture writer in the Western hemisphere. Even Bette Midler felt it necessary to comment, joking that “if Kim wants us to see a part of her we’ve never seen, she’s gonna have to swallow the camera.”


The worst part of this joke is that it’s boring. It says nothing interesting or new. If you read it a certain way, it looks like Midler is shaming Kardashian for showing off her body, which is a regressive thing to do. In a new blog post this morning, Kardashian defended herself against Midler and her other online critics with a lengthier letter to her fans. “I don’t do drugs, I hardly drink, I’ve never committed a crime—and yet I’m a bad role model for being proud of my body?” she wrote. “It always seems to come back around to my sex tape. Yes, a sex tape that was made 13 years ago. 13 YEARS AGO. Literally that lonnng ago. And people still want to talk about it?!?!”

They do. And they did. Even actress and, ahem, Nylon cover model Chloe Grace Moretz felt the need to comment, with tweets directed to Kardashian: “I truly hope you realize how important setting goals are for young women, teaching them we have so much more to offer than … just our bodies.”

It’s not an awful sentiment. It’s the context that’s awful. It’s the moralizing tone that’s awful. And Kardashian, in her letter, called it “slut-shaming.”

“It’s 2016,” she wrote. “The body-shaming and slut-shaming—it’s like, enough is enough. I will not live my life dictated by the issues you have with my sexuality. You be you and let me be me. I am a mother. I am a wife, a sister, a daughter, an entrepreneur and I am allowed to be sexy.”

It is really, really easy to have an opinion on Kim Kardashian. It is as easy getting up in the morning and checking your newsfeed. She permeates contemporary pop culture like a fine mist on a Sunday morning. Try to forget Kim Kardashian: You can’t, because she posted a selfie to the internet yesterday, and now it’s headlining your Facebook timeline. This is why opinions on Kim Kardashian are like plastic bags: There’s too many of them, and they’re ruining the environment.

Still, she is an unstoppable cultural force, and the way we talk about her—as a woman, as an entertainer, as an entrepreneur, as the wife of Kanye West—says a lot about who we are. We can mock her for plenty of things—and she takes that mockery in stride—but mocking her for being naked reflects our own discomfort with women’s sexuality. It reflects a culture that still favors conservative notions of womanhood and propriety. It reflects a culture that rewards “modesty” as a moral value, and penalizes “immodesty” as a character flaw. The thing is, men are never held accountable to the same standards of “modesty” that women are. Zac Efron flashes his chest in every movie he’s cast in. There are no think pieces or essays about his abs, as far as I’m aware.

I’m not a particularly passionate fan of Kim Kardashian. And yet I frequently find myself in the position of defending her. Because I believe in Kim Kardashian’s right to be naked, and I want to live in the kind of world that won’t shame her for exercising that right. I want to live in the kind of world where women can be nude, or cover their hair, or wear tank tops to high school, or do whatever they want with their own bodies, without having to defend themselves against censure. I want to live in the kind of world where I don’t have to write articles about Kim Kardashian’s mirror selfies. But we’re not there yet.

Articles
Photo by Casey Horner on Unsplash

As world leaders meet to discuss new ways to tackle climate change at the U.N. Climate Action Summit, they might miss one very big part of healing nature – nature. In a new short film, youth climate change activist Greta Thunberg and George Monbiot, a writer for the Guardian, talked about how we need to use nature as a solution to climate change.

There's a huge push to curb emissions, but it's not the be all end all of handling climate change; we also need to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. While we don't have technology to do that for us, there is another solution. "There is a magic machine that sucks carbon out of the air, costs very little, and builds itself. It's called a tree," Monboit says in the film. Researchers found that we could get rid of two-thirds of the carbon dioxide that we've emitted during the industrial era just by growing trees. That amounts to 205 billion tons of carbon. Right now, deforestation of tropical forests is responsible for 20% of current greenhouse emissions.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Climate Action Tracker

In 2016, 196 countries signed the Paris Agreement, pledging to combat climate change by taking action to curb the increase in global temperatures. The Paris Agreement requires countries to report on their emissions and what steps they're taking to implement those plans. Now that the countries are coming together again for the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York City, it's worth taking a look at what kind of progress they've made.

The Climate Action Trackerkeeps tabs on what each country is doing to limit warming, and if they're meeting their self-set goals. Countries are graded based on whether or not their actions would help limit warming to 1.5 degrees C.

According to a recent article from National Geographic, The Gambia, Morocco, and India are at the head of the class. "Even though carbon emissions in The Gambia, Morocco, and India are expected to rise, they'll fall short of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius limit," the article reads. Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United States, on the other hand, get a big fat F. "Projected emissions in Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the United States are far greater than what it would take to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius."

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Screenshot via Sweden.se/Twitter (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less
Science

The disappearance of 40-year-old mortgage broker William Earl Moldt remained a mystery for 22 years because the technology used to find him hadn't been developed yet.

Moldt was reported missing on November 8, 1997. He had left a nightclub around 11 p.m. where he had been drinking. He wasn't known as a heavy drinker and witnesses at the bar said he didn't seem intoxicated when he left.

Keep Reading Show less
Communities