GOOD

Why is it legal to pay workers with disabilities less than minimum wage?

Now the government wants your feedback on this policy.

When the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) became law in 1990, it offered legal protections to prevent discrimination against employees with disabilities in the workforce. There is one law it did not overturn — the ability for employers to pay some workers with disabilities less than minimum wage. Now the government is asking for feedback on this law in a national online dialogue.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which was passed in 1938, mandated protections for most workers across the country. Most notably, it guaranteed a minimum wage. FLSA also included another provision, section 14(C), that legalized subminimum wage for some people with disabilities. The initial purpose of issuing 14(C) certificates was to give companies financial incentive to hire “workers who have disabilities that impair their productivity for the work being performed.”


According to a database kept by the U.S. Department of Labor, nearly 100,000 workers with disabilities get paid under a 14(C) waiver. Employers must submit an application to receive approval to pay workers subminimum wage — it’s not available to every employer. A 14(C) certificate also does not allow any employer to pay any person with a disability at subminimum wage.

“Section 14(C) does not apply unless the disability actually impairs the worker’s earning or productive capacity for the work being performed,” according to a Department of Labor fact sheet. “The fact that a worker may have a disability is not in and of itself sufficient to warrant the payment of a subminimum wage.”

To receive a 14(C) waiver, employers must calculate the time it takes an employee without disabilities to complete a task compared to an employee with disabilities. For example, if it took a non-disabled worker five minutes to assemble a part at $12 an hour and a disabled worker took three times as long to assemble the same part, under section 14(C), the employer could legally pay the disabled worker three times less or $4 an hour. An NBC News investigation found one Goodwill location paid workers as low as $0.22 an hour. Current federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour.

The 14(C) provision in the Labor Act, however, is often prone to exploitation by bad-actor companies. In 2018, for example, the Labor Department revoked the 14(C) certificate of Rock River Valley Self Help Enterprises in Illinois. An investigation found nearly 250 employees with disabilities were exploited. After some shifts, Self Help paid employees with gift cards rather than a paycheck.

For disability advocates, employment has long been a difficult issue. In 2016, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported about 18 percent of people with disabilities were employed compared to 65 percent of those without disabilities. A 2017 report produced by the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics found the median yearly salary of people with disabilities with a third less than people without disabilities. More than 20 percent of people with disabilities qualify as low income.

There are other factors that may keep people with disabilities locked into low income or lower-paying jobs. Karin Willison, The Mighty’s disability editor, pointed out critical disability benefits such as supplemental security income (SSI) and Medicaid coverage require you to have less than $2,000 in assets if you’re single and $3,000 as a couple. This makes it more challenging for people with disabilities who want to work.

According to Vox, another part of the issue is society has historically had low expectations for people with disabilities. People with disabilities are often segregated at jobs like “sheltered workshops” (now classified as “work centers“) that hire only workers with disabilities to do menial tasks, pay subminimum wage and may offer some rehabilitation or skills training. Work centers are just one type of employer that can qualify for a 14(C) certificate.

Thanks primarily to disabled advocates who fought for inclusion, Vox noted the attitude people with disabilities aren’t capable or need to be segregated is starting to change. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP) national online dialogue on section 14(C) is a step toward reevaluating employment opportunities for people with disabilities.

The online forum asks for feedback on the experiences of section 14(C) stakeholders and ideas for the future of fair labor standards for people with disabilities. With a variety of stakeholders in the mix — people with disabilities, parents of kids with disabilities and 14(C) employers — the forum has already elicited a good deal of debate. Several commenters have called for eliminating section 14(C). KTRights wrote:

It is time for a complete phase-out of the use of 14(c) certificates and sub-minimum wage for ALL people with disabilities. Why is it that people with disabilities are the only population that can be paid less than minimum wage and it’s seen as acceptable? We will never have equal rights or be considered for competitive, integrated employment when the federal government doesn’t amend an archaic law from 1938 that completely devalues individuals with disabilities.

To share your feedback about section 14(C) and fair labor standards for people with disabilities, visit the Department of Labor’s national online dialogue forum here.

This article originally appeared on The Mighty. You can read it here.

Articles

The global climate change strikes on Friday are said to have been the largest protest for climate change in history. An estimated four million people participated in 2,500 events across 163 countries on all seven continents. That included an estimated 300,000 Australians, but a total of zero were in Hyde Park in Sydney, despite a viral photo that claims otherwise.

Australian Youth Coal Coalition, a pro-coal Facebook page, posted a photo showing trash strewn across a park after what appears to have been a large event. "Look at the mess today's climate protesters left behind in beautiful Hyde Park," the photo was captioned. "So much plastic. So much landfill. So sad." The only problem is, the photo wasn't taken after a climate change protest. It wasn't even taken in Australia.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via GOOD / YouTube

Last Friday, millions of people in 150 countries across the globe took to the streets to urge world leaders to enact dramatic solutions to combat climate change.

The Climate Strike was inspired, in part, by Greta Thunberg, a 16-year-old girl from Sweden who has captured worldwide attention for her tireless work to hold lawmakers responsible for the climate crisis.

The strike gave people across the planet the opportunity to make their voices heard before the U.N. General Assembly Climate Summit in New York City on Monday.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Photo by Casey Horner on Unsplash

As world leaders meet to discuss new ways to tackle climate change at the U.N. Climate Action Summit, they might miss one very big part of healing nature – nature. In a new short film, youth climate change activist Greta Thunberg and George Monbiot, a writer for the Guardian, talked about how we need to use nature as a solution to climate change.

There's a huge push to curb emissions, but it's not the be all end all of handling climate change; we also need to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. While we don't have technology to do that for us, there is another solution. "There is a magic machine that sucks carbon out of the air, costs very little, and builds itself. It's called a tree," Monboit says in the film. Researchers found that we could get rid of two-thirds of the carbon dioxide that we've emitted during the industrial era just by growing trees. That amounts to 205 billion tons of carbon. Right now, deforestation of tropical forests is responsible for 20% of current greenhouse emissions.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Climate Action Tracker

In 2016, 196 countries signed the Paris Agreement, pledging to combat climate change by taking action to curb the increase in global temperatures. The Paris Agreement requires countries to report on their emissions and what steps they're taking to implement those plans. Now that the countries are coming together again for the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York City, it's worth taking a look at what kind of progress they've made.

The Climate Action Trackerkeeps tabs on what each country is doing to limit warming, and if they're meeting their self-set goals. Countries are graded based on whether or not their actions would help limit warming to 1.5 degrees C.

According to a recent article from National Geographic, The Gambia, Morocco, and India are at the head of the class. "Even though carbon emissions in The Gambia, Morocco, and India are expected to rise, they'll fall short of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius limit," the article reads. Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United States, on the other hand, get a big fat F. "Projected emissions in Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the United States are far greater than what it would take to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius."

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Screenshot via Sweden.se/Twitter (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet