An Unexpected Solution To Our Organ Donor Crisis

The 120,000 Americans on the organ transplant wait list are in need of a better option

Image via Flickr user Angela (cc)

There are currently more than 120,000 Americans waiting for a life-saving organ transplant, and every day, another 22 will die before they receive one. Procuring organ donations is a notoriously complicated and unpredictable business (for starters, something tragic usually needs to happen to a donor first), and can’t come close to meeting demand.

Researchers have been hard at work seeking a safer, more reliable way to increase the organ supply. For awhile, one method in particular seemed to be gaining traction: Figure out how to grow a human organ in an animal, then harvest it as needed. However, late last year, the government revoked all funding for this type of research in what the Mercury News called “a startling reversal of policy, reminiscent of the Bush administration's 2001 ban on embryonic stem cell funding.”

To many, the idea of human-animal hybrids (a.k.a. chimeras) provokes an unease straight out of our darkest sci-fi landscapes. But at UC-Davis, one reproductive biologist Pablo Ross persists in his exploration of the field despite a lack of funding. For now, Ross does something called “gene editing.” The process is more than a little reminiscent of Frankenstein: First, he takes a pig embryo and deactivates the gene necessary for developing a pig pancreas. Then, a few days later, he adds in human stem cells to grow a human pancreas instead.

“All the organs are from the animal, except the targeted organ—the pancreas, in this case—but it's going to be made of human cells instead of being made out of the animal’s own cells,” Ross explains. Why the pancreas? Ross says that’s simply the organ that was used as proof-of-concept by Dr. Hiromitsu Nakauchi, one of his collaborators in the project. “It was in Japan where they created a rat pancreas inside a mouse or the reverse,” says Ross, “a mouse pancreas inside a rat.”

Once the pancreas-growth process is perfected, this approach could theoretically be applied to other organs. It may be obvious, but let’s talk about it anyway: The animals in which Ross’s team generates these organs will not survive; in essence, they’re turned into disposable organ factories, à la the nightmarish book/movie Never Let Me Go, in which human children are raised to grow organ for the rich.

The National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) funding ban isn’t necessarily permanent; for now, the organization is trying to work out whether animals with human organs might require special ethical considerations. In a statement, Carrie D. Wolinetz, associate director for Science Policy at NIH, said that the ban provides "a unique opportunity to take a deep breath ... and consider whether any additional policies are needed to promote the responsible conduct of this promising science.” In response, a nationwide coalition of scientists—including a vocal group at Stanford—has spoken out against the ban.

It’s a murky area in which to delve, which is likely why bioethics has become a hot topic of discussion in college philosophy courses. Justin Teague, an adjunct instructor of philosophy at Farmingdale State College in New York, discusses these issues in his classroom every semester. "I expect most moral arguments against creating chimeras (besides those concerned with animal welfare) rest on a problematic identification of our humanity with our bodies rather than our minds,” says Teague.

In other words, how much human can we put in a pig before it no longer is considered a farm animal? As Dr. Nakauchi told the MIT Technology Review earlier this year, “If the extent of human cells is 0.5 percent, it’s very unlikely to get thinking pigs or standing sheep.* But if it’s large, like 40 percent, then we’d have to do something about that.”

These are important questions to work out, which is why the NIH is putting the brakes on funding the research for now. But with so many human lives on the line, we may not have the luxury to ponder this ethical debate for long.

*Yes, pigs are quite smart and sheep already stand, but they still aren’t exactly human.


Four black women, Engineers Christine Darden and Mary Jackson, mathematician Katherine Johnson, and computer programmer Dorothy Vaughan, worked as "human computers" at NASA during the Space Race, making space travel possible through their complex calculations. Jackson, Johnson, and Vaughn all played a vital role in helping John Glenn become the first American to orbit the Earth.

They worked behind the scenes, but now they're getting the credit they deserve as their accomplishments are brought to the forefront. Their amazing stories were detailed in the book "Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race" by Margot Lee Shetterly, which was later turned into a movie. (Darden was not featured in the movie, but was in the book). Johnson has a building at NASA named after her, and a street in front of NASA's Washington D.C. headquarters was renamed "Hidden Figures Way."

Keep Reading Show less

Between Alexa, Siri, and Google, artificial intelligence is quickly changing us and the way we live. We no longer have to get up to turn on the lights or set the thermostat, we can find the fastest route to work with a click, and, most importantly, tag our friends in pictures. But interacting with the world isn't the only thing AI is making easier – now we can use it save the world, too.

Keep Reading Show less
Good News
Courtesy of John S. Hutton, MD

A report from Common Sense Media found the average child between the ages of 0 and 8 has 2 hours and 19 minutes of screen time a day, and 35% of their screen time is on a mobile device. A new study conducted by the Cincinnati Children's Hospital published in the journal, JAMA Pediatrics, found exactly what all that screen time is doing to your kid, or more specifically, your kid's developing brain. It turns out, more screen time contributes to slower brain development.

First, researchers gave the kids a test to determine how much and what kind of screen time they were getting. Were they watching fighting or educational content? Were they using it alone or with parents? Then, researchers examined the brains of children aged 3 to 5 year olds by using MRI scans. Forty seven brain-healthy children who hadn't started kindergarten yet were used for the study.

They found that kids who had more than one hour of screen time a day without parental supervision had lower levels of development in their brain's white matter, which is important when it comes to developing cognitive skills, language, and literacy.

Keep Reading Show less
via KTVU / YouTube

The 63-year-old Oakland-Alameda Coliseum, currently branded the RingCentral Coliseum, is one of the most decrepit sports venues in America.

The home to the the NFL's Oakland Raiders (until they move to Las Vegas next season) and MLB's A's, is notoriously known as the Black Hole and has made headlines for its frequent flooding and sewage issues.

One of the stadium's few positive aspects is its connection to public transportation.

Keep Reading Show less
Hero Video
via Anadirc / Flickr

We spend roughly one-third of our life asleep, another third at work and the final third trying our best to have a little fun.

But is that the correct balance? Should we spend as much time at the office as we do with our friends and family? One of the greatest regrets people have on their deathbeds is that they spent too much of their time instead of enjoying quality time with friends and family.

Lawmakers in the United Kingdom have made a significant pledge to reevaluate the work-life balance in their country.

Keep Reading Show less