Meet the Ship Set to Disrupt Whaling in the Antarctic Ocean

How the 170-foot long Steve Irwin plans to stop Japan’s recently launched whale-hunting fleet.

Image via (cc) Flickr user Yosef Silver

Last week a fleet of Japanese whaling vessels set out toward the Antarctic Ocean for that country’s first whaling expedition in over a year, having stopped the practice at the behest of the International Court of Justice in March of 2014. The ships—three harpoon vessels that hunt the whales, and the Nisshin Maru, a massive floating “factory” that processes the carcasses once the animals been killed—are conducting what is described by the Japanese government as a scientific mission, in which 330 minke whales are slated to be killed, ostensibly for the purpose of oceanographic study. It’s a move that has been widely condemned by multiple countries as well as the international scientific community, who argue that the umbrella of “research” is merely a ploy by Japan to circumvent maritime regulations on whaling.

Once they reach their destination, however, the Japanese vessels will not be alone. Meeting them in the Antarctic Ocean will be the Steve Irwin, a 170-foot ship named after the famed wildlife expert and sent by the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society with a single mission: Disrupt the Japanese fleet.

It’s a tricky proposition: The Japanese fleet has multiple boats with which they intend to carry out their directive, while the Steve Irwin will be going it alone. But the conservation group has a tried-and-true tactic they’ve used in the past for similar operations. As Jeff Hanson, managing director for Sea Shepherd Australia, explained to Inverse, the plan is to position the Steve Irwin between the Nisshin Maru and the ships doing the hunting. That way, the harpooning vessels will be unable to offload their kills into the larger ship and, accordingly, will be unable to continue hunting until they can do so. “If they can’t load the dead whales, they can’t kill the live ones,” Hanson told the publication.

Here’s what that looks like. Be warned, this video features brief footage of dead whales:

There are, of course, risks. In addition to the physical harm to ship and sailor that can come from maritime jostling, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society this summer agreed to pay over $2.5 million to Japan’s Institute of Cetacean Research, to settle a 2011 lawsuit between the two organizations over the Society’s tactics. In receiving the fees, the ICR will drop its lawsuit against Society founder Paul Watson, reports Yahoo News.

In fact, while the Steve Irwin may be putting itself on the line to protect the lives of minke whales, the courts may be where this latest whaling foray is ultimately put to an end. In a blog post responding to Japan’s current expedition on the Sea Shepherd website, Watson writes that “the Japanese whalers made a major mistake in bringing their case [against Sea Shepherd] in U.S. federal court, because this gives Sea Shepherd the legal grounds to countersue them.”

For now, though, the Steve Irwin and the Japanese fleet continue toward the Antarctic Ocean—and each other.

[via inverse]

"IMG_0846" by Adrienne Campbell is licensed under CC BY 2.0

In an effort to avoid a dystopian sci-fi future where Artificial Intelligence knows pretty much everything about you, and a team of cops led by Tom Cruise run around arresting people for crimes they did not commit because of bad predictive analysis; Bernie Sanders and other Democratic candidates have some proposals on how we can stop it.

Keep Reading Show less
Screenshot via (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Governor Grethcen Whitmer / Twitter

In 2009, the U.S. government paid $50 billion to bail out Detroit-based automaker General Motors. In the end, the government would end up losing $11.2 billion on the deal.

Government efforts saved 1.5 million jobs in the United States and a sizable portion of an industry that helped define America in the twentieth century.

As part of the auto industry's upheaval in the wake of the Great Recession, the United Automobile Workers (UAW) made sacrifices in contracts to help put the company on a solid footing after the government bailout.

Keep Reading Show less

The disappearance of 40-year-old mortgage broker William Earl Moldt remained a mystery for 22 years because the technology used to find him hadn't been developed yet.

Moldt was reported missing on November 8, 1997. He had left a nightclub around 11 p.m. where he had been drinking. He wasn't known as a heavy drinker and witnesses at the bar said he didn't seem intoxicated when he left.

Keep Reading Show less
Photo by Maria Teneva on Unsplash

Today, word choice matters, not only at the highest levels of political power in our country, but in our everyday speech, no matter our political persuasion or good intentions. Since the election of Donald Trump, we have seen an increase in hate speech everywhere from public gatherings to social media channels.

The past two months have been especially traumatic for so many groups, including the Latinx community who were targeted by a gunman in El Paso after being called "illegal invaders" of this country; immigrants who were told to "go back where they came from"; and journalists who were deemed disseminators of "evil propaganda" by our president.

These examples are enough for us to make the case, as some already have, that words matter more than ever in the current American public discourse. We must, however, all be responsible for the intentions of our speech (or tweets) and also how they are perceived.

Often, even those of us with the best intentions or the most 'woke' social justice warriors among us, use terms that are unknowingly othering, that contribute to long standing societal stereotypes or that embed violence into our speech.

While it is impossible to ignore the rhetoric stemming from the most powerful office in the land, that must not hinder each of our efforts to employ empathy and respect in the pursuit of a more just and equitable society.

For our team at Elle Communications, word choice is arguably the most important part of each of our days as we work to shape messaging with and for activists, advocates, entrepreneurs, companies, nonprofits, and other groups striving to create positive change in our country and our world.

Here are four things to consider when thinking about the ways in which we choose to move through this world and the words that we use along the way.

Keep Reading Show less