GOOD

Want Better Breeding? Do It With A Partner.

Research proves that sexual reproduction is superior to asexual reproduction, though we might’ve been able to tell you that.

In the grand debate over breeding best practices, scientists now have substantial proof that sexual reproduction is superior to asexual reproduction…that is, if you’re a plant. In a study recently published in Molecular Biology and Evolution, evolutionary geneticist Jesse Hollister along with a team of researchers demonstrated that sexually reproducing species were healthier over time, as they don’t amass harmful genetic mutations like asexual procreators do.

Yellow evening primroses. Photo by Matt H. Wade.


Hollister and his colleagues experimented with numerous evening primrose species, a flower chosen due to the fact that approximately 30 percent of the species had developed to breed asexually, pitting 30 pairs of primroses against one another, each pair containing a flower that fell in either reproductive camp. By comparing the offspring produced, Hollister said they verified that asexual reproduction led to an accumulation of “deleterious mutations over time,” in a process called Muller’s Ratchet, by which “the species’ average fitness is reduced and they are less able to compete in the ecological arena than sexual species, so they have an increased probability of extinction.”

According to Phys.org, evolutionary biologists were apparently puzzled by the inclination to reproduce sexually, pointing out that asexual reproduction seemed more rational, mathematically speaking, as every organism would be able to bear offspring, rather than only half of the population. What they had failed to consider, though, was that since mutations naturally occur in every new generation. Asexually reproducing species, if they harbored harmful mutations, would simply be passing on those defects to their offspring since their reproduction process was, essentially, cloning itself. In contrast, offspring produced sexually bore a mixture of the parents’ genes, without all of the mutations passed down in addition to the naturally occurring ones.

Professor Marc Johnson, part of the study’s research team, remarked that the findings were “the first solid genetic support” for the Muller’s Ratchet theory, going on to say: “This study has allowed us to unlock part of the mystery of why sex is so common: it's good for your health, at least if you are a plant.”

We hear there’s a pretty good case for humans as well.

Articles
via David Leavitt / Twitter

Anyone who has ever worked in retail knows that the worst thing about the job, right after the pay, are the unreasonable cheapskates who "want to talk to your manager" to get some money off an item.

They think that throwing a tantrum will save them a few bucks and don't care if they completely embarrass themselves in the process. Sometimes that involves belittling the poor employee who's just trying to get through their day with an ounce of dignity.

Twitter is rallying around a gal named Tori who works at a Target in Massachusetts after she was tweet-shamed by irate chapekate, journalist, and Twitter troll, David Leavitt.

Keep Reading
Business

Childbirth is the number one reason American women visit the hospital, and it ain't cheap. In fact, it's getting more and more expensive. A new study published in Health Affairs found that the cost of having a baby with employer-sponsored health insurance increased by almost 50% in the past seven years.

The study evaluated "trends in cost-sharing for maternity care for women with employer-based health insurance plans, before and after the Affordable Care Act," which was signed into law in 2010. The study looked at over 657,061 women enrolled in large employer-sponsored health insurance plans who delivered babies between 2008 and 2015, as these plans tend to cover more than plans purchased by small businesses or individuals.

Keep Reading
Health

A meteorite crashed into Earth nearly 800,000 years ago. The meteor was 1.2 miles wide, and the impact was so big, it covered 10% of the planet with debris. However, scientists haven't been able to find the impact site for over a century. That is, until now. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal believes the crash site has been located.

Tektites, which are essentially rocks that have been liquefied from the heat of the impact and then cooled to form glass, help scientists spot the original impact site of a meteor. Upon impact, melted material is thrown into the atmosphere, then falls back to the ground. Even if the original crater has disappeared due to erosion or is hidden by a shift in tectonic plates, tektites give the spot away. Tektites between 750,000 to 35.5 million years old have been found in every continent except Antarctica.

Keep Reading