GOOD

A New Documentary Connects Feminism’s Past to its Present

Remembering feminism’s grassroots-led second wave

When we were three years old, my best friend, Bret, and I knew the game of tag was forbidden inside our Long Island preschool. We flouted the rules one afternoon and tore through the classroom anyway. I chased Bret, pumping my arms and running with all my might, smack into a teacher who was blocking my way.


“Girls aren’t supposed to run around the classroom,” she towered over my three-year-old head. “You should know better. Go sit in the corner.”

From the corner, I watched forlornly as Bret assumed a grave expression and joined the rest of the class for story time. In that corner, in 1986, I became acutely aware of sexism. I became a feminist.

That was 20 years after the movement’s second wave ignited, as depicted in She’s Beautiful When She’s Angry, a Mary Dore-produced documentary I caught in the East Village last weekend. It’s a not-altogether dispiriting tour through five of the busiest years of the movement—1966 to 1971—that fomented consciousness-raising meetings and the National Organization for Women; demonstrations against catcalling and the Pill’s side effects; and rallying cries for women to control not only their reproductive lives but their working lives as well.

Photo by Virginia Blaisdell

Dore and her team weave historical footage with modern interviews with about a dozen second-wave leaders recounting their younger days at the forefront of the battle for political, economic, and social equality. It took courage and creativity at first, but as more and more women signed on and they graduated from burning bras to burning college degrees that taught nothing about women’s history, it seemed more like a party, one that I’m genuinely sorry I missed. The film was astonishing in reminding us of the “liberties” we take for granted today. Women can have bank accounts; job ads are no longer segregated by gender. We forget that, without these activists, the notion that women can have a life outside of the home would still be controversial.

The documentary underscored that the movement wasn’t called women’s liberation for nothing. Are we liberated from double standards and narrow constricts of how to live and act? Yes, more so. But we’re still under attack politically and economically. Socially, sexism is more subtle—from the roles available to women in Hollywood to the composition of Fortune 500 boards—which is even harder to call out and rally around. And more than 40 years after Roe v. Wade, we’re treading familiar ground. “Not since women have fought for suffrage has an issue been more important than abortion,” said one television news reporter in the film. That footage was archival. Ouch.

Society has moved past the need for demonstrations with the tagline “Don’t iron while the strike is hot,” but we still need demonstrations. We still need consciousness raising meetings and we still need to discuss how we’re falling prey to what Kate Millett called “cooperation in one’s own oppression.” The biggest impact I believe I’ve made this year was when I heeded Sheryl Sandberg’s call and hosted a Lean In circle. Everyone left feeling that the personal was the political, realizing that the prejudices they faced at home, at the office, and in the world beyond were not isolated instances but systemic.

One of the film’s most poignant lines comes from Virginia Whitehill, an influential voice in the ruling of Roe v. Wade: “You’re not allowed to retire from women’s issues because someone’s going to pull the rug out from under you.” There’s plenty of work to be done as Whitehill’s words ring eternal. Until women have total equality, we must forge ahead while protecting the movement’s gains. Nearly 30 years after I was sent to the corner, and almost 50 years since the second wave began, I couldn’t help but nod along with the crowd in the dark theater. Right on, sister. Right on.

[/vimeo]

Articles
Photo by Casey Horner on Unsplash

As world leaders meet to discuss new ways to tackle climate change at the U.N. Climate Action Summit, they might miss one very big part of healing nature – nature. In a new short film, youth climate change activist Greta Thunberg and George Monbiot, a writer for the Guardian, talked about how we need to use nature as a solution to climate change.

There's a huge push to curb emissions, but it's not the be all end all of handling climate change; we also need to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. While we don't have technology to do that for us, there is another solution. "There is a magic machine that sucks carbon out of the air, costs very little, and builds itself. It's called a tree," Monboit says in the film. Researchers found that we could get rid of two-thirds of the carbon dioxide that we've emitted during the industrial era just by growing trees. That amounts to 205 billion tons of carbon. Right now, deforestation of tropical forests is responsible for 20% of current greenhouse emissions.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Climate Action Tracker

In 2016, 196 countries signed the Paris Agreement, pledging to combat climate change by taking action to curb the increase in global temperatures. The Paris Agreement requires countries to report on their emissions and what steps they're taking to implement those plans. Now that the countries are coming together again for the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York City, it's worth taking a look at what kind of progress they've made.

The Climate Action Trackerkeeps tabs on what each country is doing to limit warming, and if they're meeting their self-set goals. Countries are graded based on whether or not their actions would help limit warming to 1.5 degrees C.

According to a recent article from National Geographic, The Gambia, Morocco, and India are at the head of the class. "Even though carbon emissions in The Gambia, Morocco, and India are expected to rise, they'll fall short of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius limit," the article reads. Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United States, on the other hand, get a big fat F. "Projected emissions in Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the United States are far greater than what it would take to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius."

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Screenshot via Sweden.se/Twitter (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less
Science

The disappearance of 40-year-old mortgage broker William Earl Moldt remained a mystery for 22 years because the technology used to find him hadn't been developed yet.

Moldt was reported missing on November 8, 1997. He had left a nightclub around 11 p.m. where he had been drinking. He wasn't known as a heavy drinker and witnesses at the bar said he didn't seem intoxicated when he left.

Keep Reading Show less
Communities