Telling the Stories of Immigrant Children

Rebecca Cammisa's Which Way Home follows children who desperately try to cross the U.S.-Mexican border. In the last several...

Rebecca Cammisa's Which Way Home follows children who desperately try to cross the U.S.-Mexican border.

In the last several years, immigration policy has been central to most national conversations. What's often left out of the story, however, are the almost 100,000 children detained each year trying to get into the United States on their own. It's a startling number that raises many questions. How many make it in without getting caught? What happens to them when they get here? And what of those who don't even make it as far as the border? In her revealing new documentary, Which Way Home, Rebecca Cammisa tackles some of these questions.With unprecedented access, Cammisa-who gained notoriety after her 2002 film Sister Helen-followed a handful of unaccompanied children from Latin America to the United States. Some make it; others don't; and each of their stories is as compelling as it is tough to watch. With the documentary scheduled to air next week on HBO, GOOD caught up with Cammisa to find out a little more about the problem-and its possible solutions.GOOD: This is a wildly under-reported story. How did you come upon the subject?REBECCA CAMMISA: A friend called me up and told me to read an article. He said it's about child migrants who are traveling by themselves and I said "What?" I had no idea this was occurring. I'm sort of a news junkie and I realized that if I don't know about it, there must be a lot of people who don't know about it. That was sort of the impetus to make the film.

G: How did you find the children you follow?RC: Primarily, we'd find them in detention centers, or we would meet them on the road, at bus stations, on the train tracks where migrants congregate to wait for freight trains going north. We also met children in shelters, on the street doing tricks at intersections to try to raise funds.G: I was doing some background reading and there just isn't much out there about this. What are the numbers like?RC: The statistic we got from the U.S. border patrol is that every year they detain close to 100,000 children. But of course statistics are really problematic. Because this is illegal and a shadow world going on, there's no one sitting there as people swing by going north, and the only way to count is to count how many people come through shelters, or how many people are caught and detained by immigration.G: What do you think is the pull for someone so young, traveling on their own?RC: The United States is the fulfillment of dreams. You can get a job. Families get separated because parents leave seeking work, so one aspect of this is the problem of family reunification. Parents are trying to bring their kids to meet them the only way they know how, and children are trying to get to them the only way they know how.G: And these kids expecting to find work when they get here, too?RC: Some are, yeah. You know, we told a few of them, "You're not going to be able to go to Times Square and shine shoes. Children aren't allowed to work in the United States-they have to be in school." And they'd say "No, I'll get a job." So, you know, children are coming to find employment, to run away from problems at home, to help their families, to find their parents. Others live on the streets and they think if they come to the United States they can find a family to adopt them and love them.G: I imagine it doesn't work out that way very often.RC: I'm not a statistician or an academic, so I haven't studied what happens, but I know a few who have made it here and gotten jobs. Others die en route, others are scooped up into the prostitution networks, others are forced to be drug mules. There are all kinds of nasty things that can happen to a child.G: What do you think can be done to help these kids?RC: Listen, migration has been the human story since the dawn of time, so there will never be one thing that will solve everyone's problems. Still, a lot of people migrate because there are no choices left; there is nothing left for them in their country. Maybe their homes were wiped out by a hurricane or their crops are no longer of value because they've been undercut by the U.S. market. But if you go to the source, people wouldn't migrate in mass droves if they could succeed and be sustained in their home country. If people are supported and succeeding, they'll stay.

G: What kind of legislation do you think could help?RC: If we can just say, Yes, we need workers, and accept it, then you can create a system where people can come legally, and seasonally, and work. That could help a lot, because one big reason why these children are trying to get here, or their families are trying to smuggle them in, is in an attempt at reunification. So, if people are allowed seasonal work, have the papers or a card to do so, they can come and go, and there's a circularity achieved. But with a lock-down at the border and no way for people to come and work and be legal just creates this situation where parents never return home and children don't see their parents for years on end. It's coming to terms with what do we need for our economy, to make it functional, and that may alleviate what people have to go through to get here.G: How would that impact the people in your film?RC: Seeing people in these situations, it's completely dehumanizing. I'd like to see laws that support people being treated with respect and not being dehumanized or being placed into dangerous situations, or being forced to make the only decision they can make, and that decision putting them in danger. I think if [a subject in the film] Kevin's mother could survive and afford her own home, she wouldn't talk to her son about helping her out. And Olga and Freddy might not have to go try to find their parents in Minnesota if there was some sort of seasonal, functional system where they cold come and go. They would have seen their parents by now.G: At the end of the film, we don't know what happens to Olga and Freddy. Do you know now where they are?RC: No. It's tragic and it's very upsetting to me that children are put in these situations, but it's harder on them, quite frankly. They're the ones who live it.--Which Way Home airs on August 24 on HBO. For more information, click here. To support the people and shelters in this film, click here.Disclosure: Bristol Baughn, a GOOD co-founder, was an executive producer on this film.Photograph and stills courtesy of HBO Documentary Films. Header photo: Rebecca Cammisa and Kevin, one of the film's principle children.
via Chela Horsdal / Twitter

Amazon's "The Man in the High Castle" debuted the first episode of its final season last week.

The show is loosely based on an alternative history novel by Philip K. Dick that postulates what would happen if Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan controlled the United States after being victorious in World War II.

Keep Reading Show less
via Mike Mozart / Flickr

Chick-fil-A is the third-largest fast food chain in America, behind McDonald's and Starbucks, raking in over $10 billion a year.

But for years, the company has faced boycotts for supporting anti-LGBT charities, including the Salvation Army, the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and the Paul Anderson Youth Home.

The Salvation Army faced criticism after a leader in the organization implied that gay people "deserve to die" and the company also came under fire after refusing to offer same-sex couples health insurance. But the organization swears it's evolving on such issues.

via Thomas Hawk / Flickr

The Fellowship of Christian Athletes explicitly announced it was anti gay marriage in a recent "Statement of Faith."

God instituted marriage between one man and one woman as the foundation of the family and the basic structure of human society. For this reason, we believe that marriage is exclusively the union of one man and one woman.

The Paul Anderson Youth Home teaches boys that homosexuality is wrong and that same-sex marriage is "rage against Jesus Christ and His values."

RELATED: The 1975's singer bravely kissed a man at a Dubai concert to protest anti-LGBT oppression

In 2012, Chick-fil-A's CEO, Dan Cathy, made anti same-sex marriage comments on a radio broadcast:

I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, "We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage". I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.

But the chicken giant has now decided to change it's says its charitable donation strategy because it's bad for business...Not because being homophobic is wrong.

The company recently lost several bids to provide concessions in U.S. airports. A pop-up shop in England was told it would not be renewed after eight days following LGBTQ protests.

Chick-fil-A also has plans to expand to Boston, Massachusetts where its mayor, Thomas Menino, pledged to ban the restaurant from the city.

via Wikimedia Commons

"There's no question we know that, as we go into new markets, we need to be clear about who we are," Chick-fil-A President and Chief Operating Officer Tim Tassopoulos told Bisnow. "There are lots of articles and newscasts about Chick-fil-A, and we thought we needed to be clear about our message."

RELATED: Alan Turing will appear on the 50-pound note nearly 70 years after being persecuted for his sexuality

Instead, the Chick-fil-A Foundation plans to give $9 million to organizations that support education and fight homelessness. Which is commendable regardless of the company's troubled past.

"If Chick-Fil-A is serious about their pledge to stop holding hands with divisive anti-LGBTQ activists, then further transparency is needed regarding their deep ties to organizations like Focus on the Family, which exist purely to harm LGBTQ people and families," Drew Anderson, GLAAD's director of campaigns and rapid response, said in a statement.

Chick-fil-A's decision to back down from contributing to anti-LGBT charities shows the power that people have to fight back against companies by hitting them where it really hurts — the pocket book.

The question remains: If you previously avoided Chick-fil-A because it supported anti-LGBT organizations, is it now OK to eat there? Especially when Popeye's chicken sandwich is so good people will kill for it?


Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr and nrkbeta / flickr

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) dropped a bombshell on Tuesday, announcing it had over 900 emails that White House aide Stephen Miller sent to former Breitbart writer and editor Katie McHugh.

According to the SPLC, in the emails, Miller aggressively "promoted white nationalist literature, pushed racist immigration stories and obsessed over the loss of Confederate symbols after Dylann Roof's murderous rampage."

Keep Reading Show less
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less