In this morning’s laptop chat, Barack Obama outlines, in broad strokes, the new New Deal everyone’s speculating about.[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m17pz0R_qZoThoughts after the jump.Obama says: “We’ll put people back to work rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, modernizing schools that are failing our children, and building wind farms and solar panels; fuel-efficient cars and the alternative energy technologies that can free us from our dependence on foreign oil and keep our economy competitive in the years ahead.”This is great to hear, but in some respects, the timing could be better. We’re having to invest huge sums building wind and solar energy generators before the technology has matured. Standard, earth-bound windmills might end up being a sub-optimal way of harvesting wind power. Similarly, it’s unclear whether or not solar panels should be built on mechanical arms so they can follow the sun.Big technological advances may be right around the corner and it would be a shame if we end up spending billions on specific alternative energy technologies that turn out the be the alt-energy equivalent of Betamax.That said, there’s clearly no time to delay. And this would be less of an issue if we had supported R&D in this stuff over the last eight years.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

