Back in 2006, the Canadian marine biologist Boris Worm authored a controversial study that warned that we could literally run out of fish by 2048.Since then some new conservation measures were been put in place in a few ecosystems. And it turns out they’ve worked. A new, more detailed study by Worm and a collaborator named Ray Hilborn shows that fish are bouncing back in a number of places:Fish abundance is increasing in previously overfished areas around Iceland, the north-east U.S. shelf, the Newfoundland-Labrador shelf and California. This has benefitted species such as American plaice, pollock, haddock and Atlantic cod.According to the authors “some of the most spectacular rebuilding efforts have involved bold experimentation with closed areas, gear and effort restrictions and new approaches to catch allocations and enforcement.”So the good news is that when an area tries to manage fisheries, it works. The problem, though, is that this kind of fisheries management isn’t happening everywhere. And where it isn’t happening-Ireland and the North Sea, for example-we’re still in danger of totally destroying ecosystems.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

