There is a brilliant piece in Forbes (via Treehugger) in which a brilliant man named Myron Ebell argues that global warming is nice because people don’t like to live in cold places, and this will make more places hospitable to live. He says that the benefits of this surely outweigh any rising of sea levels, because that only affects places on the coast, whereas if it gets warmer, people all across the country will benefit. This is a great argument, because only a very small population of America lives on the coasts, and very few of the most important financial and political centers are there. This should be fine. Also, stick around for his coup de grace argument about how pleasant hotter temperatures mandate more air conditioner use, which use a lot of energy, warm the globe more, and make it even more pleasantly warm. And then move on to the Treehugger post, in which you can discover that Myron Ebell works for the same people who call carbon dioxide life. Synergy!
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

