GOOD

How to Get Companies to Care About Recycling? Get the Shareholders on Board

"Packaging can be up to 50 percent of a company’s total [carbon] footprint."

"Packaging can be up to 50 percent of a company’s total [carbon] footprint." Which is why As You Sow is urging companies to turn the waste they generate into a renewable resource. Image via Flickr user Tony Webster (cc)

Though California has one of the highest recycling rates in the nation, America generates more waste than any other country in the world and recycles less. The severity of this issue drives one of the pet projects of As You Sow, a corporate social responsibility (CSR) business. Founded in 1992, As You Sow has become an instigator of of corporate environmental responsibility, leading measurable change in the beverage packaging sector. As You Sow’s vision holds that shareholders are “the single most powerful force for creating positive, lasting changes in corporate behavior.” Thus, they make proposals directly to shareholders, and issue an annual report card that rates companies on their recycling and sustainability efforts. Their efforts have had a positive impact on sustainability efforts of the three biggest beverage companies, Coca Cola, Nestlé Waters, and Pepsi, since 2006.


Conrad MacKerron
Senior Vice President, As You Sow

Conrad MacKerron, Senior Vice President of As You Sow, runs the outreach initiative on recycling and waste issues. He initiated the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) effort, he tells GOOD, “Because I was concerned about poor bottle and can recycling rates in the U.S.” The goal of EPRs, he says, is to “shift the funding of recycling from taxpayer to companies. All of us pay for recycling and garbage as citizens in the US.” He doesn’t feel that leaving the financial burden with the individual is the best way to improve recycling rates.

EPR has been successful in other industries, such as consumer electronics, and batteries—where consumers can return these to drop-off stations and then manufacturers handle recycling or reusing the materials—but the idea is relatively new to the bottle and packaging industries. As You Sow joined forces with the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) to grade the packaging practices of 47 companies including fast food chains, beverage companies and consumer goods and grocery companies in their 2015 Waste and Opportunity Report based on “four pillars” or practices:

  • \nSource Reduction: Switch to reusable packaging, or packaging with less material to reduce virgin content.
  • \nRecycled Content: Use recycled content to make new products, which helps create a market for recycled materials and requires far fewer resources.
  • \nRecyclability and Materials Use: Materials that are very difficult to recycle, like flexible laminate pouches, should be avoided.
  • \nBoosting Materials Recycling: Other materials are recycled but only at low rates because of lack of bins, infrastructure, end markets, or public education. Companies have failed to do enough to ensure their packaging is actually recycled.

“Since many companies are focused on climate change and reducing their carbon footprint, issues of waste often get kicked down to the back burner,” MacKerron says. This, he feels, is a mistake, considering that managing the packaging side of solid waste better can lead to reduction in the total carbon footprint. “Coke has done research showing that packaging can be up to 50 percent of a company’s total footprint.”

When the EPR program was first broached with the big beverage companies in 2006 after their first report card grades came back low, MacKerron says he was soon impressed with Nestlé Waters’ turnaround and commitment to bringing up PET beverage container recycling rates when other companies still balked at making changes. “We educated over 60 companies for whom recycling wasn’t even on their radar,” says MacKerron. “In most cases we were the first group who had asked ‘What is your policy on your responsibility for recycling your packaging?’ and ‘What would you pay to help recycle your products?’ In October of 2008, Nestlé Waters became the first beverage company to commit to an industry-wide bottle recovery goal. As You Sow recognized the company for its commitment to help improve recycling rates to 60 percent for PET plastic beverage bottles by 2018.

As You Sow now has its sights set on companies that produce non-beverage packaging, such as Proctor and Gamble, and is putting special pressure on those that produce flexible plastic pouch packaging, which combine thin aluminum and polyethylene plastic for longer shelf life, such as Kraft’s Capri Suns. “There’s no end-of-life solution for them,” says MacKerron. “They can’t be recycled anywhere, so they’re all tossed into landfill. We’ve gone to these companies saying we want them to work on making these recyclable.”

The beverage companies are in the best position to increase recycling rates since the PET (#1) plastic used by most of them is highly recyclable, and less likely to become contaminated when only used as beverage containers (compared to say, motor oil or peanut butter containers, which also use PET). The more consumers recycle their containers, the more material is available to keep the closed loop system of bottle-to-bottle recycling going. Recycled PET (rPET), however, is so popular that the carpet and textile industries also use it for making their products, which can reduce the available amount of rPET on the market. “I don’t think it’s a good idea for rPET beverage bottles to be used in carpets; take something dirtier and keep the bottles in a closed loop,” says MacKerron. “Maybe you get one more life out of it as a carpet, but you might get 50 more uses in a bottle to bottle loop.”

MacKerron sees small waves of change on the horizon and remains optimistic that with these three big beverage companies leading the way, other brands, in other sectors, will soon feel more than just the heat of climate change, and get on board to improve their practices.

Articles
via Chela Horsdal / Twitter

Amazon's "The Man in the High Castle" debuted the first episode of its final season last week.

The show is loosely based on an alternative history novel by Philip K. Dick that postulates what would happen if Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan controlled the United States after being victorious in World War II.

Keep Reading Show less
Politics
via Mike Mozart / Flickr

Chick-fil-A is the third-largest fast food chain in America, behind McDonald's and Starbucks, raking in over $10 billion a year.

But for years, the company has faced boycotts for supporting anti-LGBT charities, including the Salvation Army, the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and the Paul Anderson Youth Home.

The Salvation Army faced criticism after a leader in the organization implied that gay people "deserve to die" and the company also came under fire after refusing to offer same-sex couples health insurance. But the organization swears it's evolving on such issues.

via Thomas Hawk / Flickr

The Fellowship of Christian Athletes explicitly announced it was anti gay marriage in a recent "Statement of Faith."

God instituted marriage between one man and one woman as the foundation of the family and the basic structure of human society. For this reason, we believe that marriage is exclusively the union of one man and one woman.

The Paul Anderson Youth Home teaches boys that homosexuality is wrong and that same-sex marriage is "rage against Jesus Christ and His values."

RELATED: The 1975's singer bravely kissed a man at a Dubai concert to protest anti-LGBT oppression

In 2012, Chick-fil-A's CEO, Dan Cathy, made anti same-sex marriage comments on a radio broadcast:

I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, "We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage". I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.

But the chicken giant has now decided to change it's says its charitable donation strategy because it's bad for business...Not because being homophobic is wrong.

The company recently lost several bids to provide concessions in U.S. airports. A pop-up shop in England was told it would not be renewed after eight days following LGBTQ protests.

Chick-fil-A also has plans to expand to Boston, Massachusetts where its mayor, Thomas Menino, pledged to ban the restaurant from the city.

via Wikimedia Commons

"There's no question we know that, as we go into new markets, we need to be clear about who we are," Chick-fil-A President and Chief Operating Officer Tim Tassopoulos told Bisnow. "There are lots of articles and newscasts about Chick-fil-A, and we thought we needed to be clear about our message."

RELATED: Alan Turing will appear on the 50-pound note nearly 70 years after being persecuted for his sexuality

Instead, the Chick-fil-A Foundation plans to give $9 million to organizations that support education and fight homelessness. Which is commendable regardless of the company's troubled past.

"If Chick-Fil-A is serious about their pledge to stop holding hands with divisive anti-LGBTQ activists, then further transparency is needed regarding their deep ties to organizations like Focus on the Family, which exist purely to harm LGBTQ people and families," Drew Anderson, GLAAD's director of campaigns and rapid response, said in a statement.

Chick-fil-A's decision to back down from contributing to anti-LGBT charities shows the power that people have to fight back against companies by hitting them where it really hurts — the pocket book.

The question remains: If you previously avoided Chick-fil-A because it supported anti-LGBT organizations, is it now OK to eat there? Especially when Popeye's chicken sandwich is so good people will kill for it?

Lifestyle

Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr and nrkbeta / flickr

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) dropped a bombshell on Tuesday, announcing it had over 900 emails that White House aide Stephen Miller sent to former Breitbart writer and editor Katie McHugh.

According to the SPLC, in the emails, Miller aggressively "promoted white nationalist literature, pushed racist immigration stories and obsessed over the loss of Confederate symbols after Dylann Roof's murderous rampage."

Keep Reading Show less
Politics
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less
Business