Brewmasters Turn To DNA Analysis To Make Better Beer

Beer makers adopt a high tech solution to one of brewing’s oldest problems.

image via (cc) flickr user thomashawk

When it comes to beer, I don’t have a particularly discerning palate. “Cold” and “not too much foam” are pretty much my only criteria for whether or not I’ll drink a pint (and even then I’m pretty flexible). But, at the end of the day, I’d like to think I have enough sense of taste to know the difference between “good” beer and “bad,” even if I couldn’t necessarily tell you why.

For professional brewmasters, though, the difference between good and bad beer is what makes or breaks a company. That’s why a number of forward thinking breweries are making the leap from basic fermentation chemistry to advanced DNA analysis to ensure their suds are suitable for sipping. Because when it comes to beer, it’s not just the big problems that can spoil a batch, it’s the small ones. The microscopic ones. Bacteria, specifically two kinds: Pediococcus and Lactobacillus, both of which can completely skunk certain types of beer if they get into the brewing mix.

image via (cc) flickr user placbo

This week, The Verge’s Josh Lowensohn writes about his visit to Russian River Brewing Company, an award-winning craft brewery out of California, which has begun using DNA testing to determine whether a particular quantity of beer has been contaminated with the aforementioned bacteria. That, explains Lowensohn, is a very real threat for Russian River because, beyond the general persistent threat of bacterial contamination due to general growth in-and-around brewing ingredients, the company also makes a number of Sour Beers—ones that are intentionally bitter or acidic, such as lambics and gueuzes—which actually require the use of Pediococcus and Lactobacillus in the fermentation process. In other words, the thing which could completely ruin one batch of beers, is a sin qua non for another.

Brewers have long been on the look out for bacterial contamination ruining their wares. As points out, the current method for testing involves using an algae-derived substance called agar to determine whether a sample from a batch hosts the bacteria. It’s a fairly time-consuming process, because once bacteria is identified, brewers must then go back to their equipment, check for the point of contamination, isolate it, clean it, and only then resume brewing. Days can be lost simply trying to get things back on track. And when days are lost, so is money.

That’s why Russian River has begun using BrewPAL, a DNA scanner designed to specifically identify traces of Pediococcus and Lactobacillus at various points along a beer’s creation process in just a matter of hours. Explains Lowensohn:

The idea behind the BrewPal is that you can simply get a yes or no for if the bacteria is there, much like an over-the-counter test for pregnancy. The test uses a polymerase chain reaction, or PCR for short. The process was developed in the early 1980s, and effectively works as a photocopier for DNA, amplifying a relatively small sample into something that can be more accurately measured. It’s been used in everything from criminal forensics and paternity tests to helping enforce overfishing tied to black caviar.

The system, he points out, is just one of a host of new DNA testers—some more sensitive but requiring more testing time, and others the opposite—hitting the brewery circuit as beer makers look for easier, cheaper, and more efficient ways to ensure their product is market ready. This means that even if you’ve got an unsophisticated beer palate like mine, you’re more likely to enjoy quality brew, without fear of sipping on an accidental bad batch.

Here’s hoping the next scientific advance in the world of beer is a cure for hangovers.

[via Verge]

via GOOD / YouTube

Last Friday, millions of people in 150 countries across the globe took to the streets to urge world leaders to enact dramatic solutions to combat climate change.

The Climate Strike was inspired, in part, by Greta Thunberg, a 16-year-old girl from Sweden who has captured worldwide attention for her tireless work to hold lawmakers responsible for the climate crisis.

The strike gave people across the planet the opportunity to make their voices heard before the U.N. General Assembly Climate Summit in New York City on Monday.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Julian Meehan

Young leaders from around the world are gathering at the United Nations Headquarters in New York Saturday to address arguably the most urgent issue of our time. The Youth Climate Summit comes on the heels of an international strike spearheaded by Greta Thunberg, the 16-year-old climate activist from Sweden, who arrived in New York via emissions-free sailboat earlier this month.

Translated from Swedish, "berg" means "mountain," so it may feel fated that a young woman with Viking blood in her veins and summit in her name would be at the helm. But let's go out on a limb and presume Thunberg, in keeping with most activists, would chafe at the notion of pre-ordained "destiny," and rightly so. Destiny is passive — it happens to you. It's also egomaniacal. Change, on the other hand, is active; you have to fight. And it is humble. "We need to get angry and understand what is at stake," Thunberg declared. "And then we need to transform that anger into action."

This new generation of activists' most pernicious enemy is denial. The people in charge — complacent politicians and corporation heads who grossly benefit from maintaining the status quo — are buffered from real-life consequences of climate change. But millions of people don't share that privilege. For them, climate change isn't an abstract concept, but a daily state of emergency, whether it comes in the form of "prolonged drought in sub-Saharan Africa…devastating tropical storms sweeping across Southeast Asia, the Caribbean and the Pacific…[or] heatwaves and wildfires," as Amnesty International reportsare all too real problems people are facing on a regular basis.

RELATED: Greta Thunberg urges people to turn to nature to combat climate change

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Climate Action Tracker

In 2016, 196 countries signed the Paris Agreement, pledging to combat climate change by taking action to curb the increase in global temperatures. The Paris Agreement requires countries to report on their emissions and what steps they're taking to implement those plans. Now that the countries are coming together again for the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York City, it's worth taking a look at what kind of progress they've made.

The Climate Action Trackerkeeps tabs on what each country is doing to limit warming, and if they're meeting their self-set goals. Countries are graded based on whether or not their actions would help limit warming to 1.5 degrees C.

According to a recent article from National Geographic, The Gambia, Morocco, and India are at the head of the class. "Even though carbon emissions in The Gambia, Morocco, and India are expected to rise, they'll fall short of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius limit," the article reads. Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United States, on the other hand, get a big fat F. "Projected emissions in Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the United States are far greater than what it would take to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius."

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

September 20th marks the beginning of a pivotal push for the future of our planet. The Global Climate Strike will set the stage for the United Nations Climate Action Summit, where more than 60 nations are expected to build upon their commitment to 2015's Paris Agreement for combating climate change.

Millions of people are expected to take part in an estimated 4,000 events across 130 countries.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less