Artist Uses Gay Men’s Blood to Protest a Discriminatory FDA Policy

“Blood Mirror” was created using blood supplied by men who would much rather the FDA accept their donations, instead.

image via youtube screen capture

Since the early 80s, the Food and Drug Administration, citing fears of HIV infection, has effectively banned gay and bisexual men from donating blood. It’s a policy that has, for decades now, been blasted as being both discriminatory and unnecessary. Since 2006, even organizations like the American Red Cross, and other blood-donation service providers, have begun characterizing the policy as scientifically unnecessary and outdated. Recently, even the FDA itself has considered revising their ban to allow for donations from gays and bisexual men, providing the donor has been celibate for 12 months.

It’s progress, yes, but for many, it’s imperfect progress at a frustrating, unacceptably slow pace.

Out of this frustration comes “Blood Mirror,” a massive sculpture created by artist Jordan Eagles. As its title suggests, the piece uses actual blood donated by nine gay, bisexual, and transgender men from all walks of life. Videographer Leo Herrera was on hand throughout the sculpture’s creation, documenting not only how the piece took shape, but the men who—literally—spilled their blood to make it happen.

The micro-doc was released last week ahead of World Blood Donor Day, which fell on June 14th. It encourages viewers to share their thoughts with the FDA regarding the proposed lifting of the donation ban, conditional upon a year of celibacy.

It is ultimately unclear whether the FDA will adopt a new, less-restrictive policy, and if that will then lead to a full reversal of the ban on gay and bisexual donations. Thanks, however, to artists like Jordan Eagles and Leo Herrera, and works like “Blood Mirror,” the world knows there are those out there willing to bleed in the hopes of one day being given an equal opportunity to help others in need.

[via newnownext]

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading