One of the pieces in the NY Times “Year in Ideas” considers the so-called “Obama effect”-whether the President’s defying of racial conventions may actually remove mental roadblocks that plague other African-Americans.Previous studies have shown that by priming black students with racial judgments could affect their performance on academic tests. The same sort of “stereotype threats” affect women, as well.A team of researchers led by David Marx, a San Diego State University psychologist, provided evidence for an Obama effect by administering verbal exams to black and white students at four times during the 2008 presidential campaign. Rising above racial stereotypes in academic performance, the black students showed a marked uptick in their scores right after Obama’s acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention (if the students had watched it) and after his election.Interestingly a similar study, which prompted students to merely think about Obama and his achievements, found no role model-effect. The discrepancy could point to a temporal issue: that the afterglow of an Obama triumph is inspirational, whereas simply recalling an event won’t do the trick.Maybe a better idea for cutting the achievement gap than hoping that every day is a good one for the 44th POTUS would be to try to eliminate the stereotype threat in the first place.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

